The Causes and Consequences
of Test Score Manipulation: Evidence from the New York Regents Examinations ∗
In just the past three academic years, FairTest has documented confirmed cases
of test score manipulation in 33 states plus the District of Columbia.
By contrast, Rockoff et al.'s Regents Exam analysis found very little evidence
of test score manipulation in quantitative subjects.
Not exact matches
The Committee has received and is investigating reports suggesting corruption, self - dealing, the
manipulation of test scores in charter schools and the politicization
of the charter school movement.
Second, Rick thinks there is an inconsistency in my suspicion that
test - prep and
manipulation are largely responsible for
test score improvements by Milwaukee choice schools after they were required to take high - stakes
tests, while I interpret research from Florida as showing schools made exceptional
test score gains when faced with the prospect
of having vouchers offered to their students if
scores did not improve.
In this paper, we show that the design and decentralized, school - based
scoring of New York's high school exit exams — the Regents Examinations — led to the systematic
manipulation of test sores just below important proficiency cutoffs.
The
manipulation hurts the most needy students, said he center's president, Bob Shaeffer: «Most
of the most significant cases
of cheating have occurred in low income communities where students have historically had the lowest
test scores.»
In this paper, we show that the design and decentralized, school - based
scoring of New York's high school exit exams — the Regents Examinations — led to the systematic
manipulation of test sores just