However, if you're needing to carry your laptop with you then go up a size to the large, and then you'll be able to carry your A4 notebook and maybe a couple
of text books as well!
Not exact matches
Copywriter Salaries Copywriting Examples Start Learning Copy Now Copywriting Tools Consulting
As A Side Job How To Become A Copywriter Make a Copywriting Portfolio Copywriting
Books and Courses Freelance Writing for Beginners Swipe File Copywriting Guides: The State
of Copywriting 2018 Direct Mail Marketing Guide One Pager Examples Sell Me This Pen Leading Questions Why Use Images vs
Text How To Write A Brochure Headlines That Sell Using Ear Plugs To Write Writing Guides Three Tiered Pricing Different Pricing Examples How To Make A PDF Billboard Advertising Guide Write an AirBnB Description How to Write a SWOT Analysis Job Interview Questions How to Write a Memo How to Write a Testimonial Make Money Licensing Music How to Create a Tagline Work From Home Successfully LinkedIn Recommendations Choosing The Right Photos How to Start A Conversation How to Sell Art Online How To Become A Life Coach Best Business Podcasts Tone
of Voice in Copywriting Workplace Communication Skills Power & Trigger Words For Sales Content Marketing Guides: Writing Advertorials Easiest Font to Read How To Write A Follow Up Email Cold Email Like A Boss S&P 500 Company Slogan Effective Sales Letters How to Write a Newsletter How to Write an About Page How to Get Your Posts Seen Making A Content Mill Real Estate Flyers Get First Photography Job Email Open Rate Examples Content Writing vs Copywriting Become A Famous YouTuber Story Arcs for Content Marketing Copywriter Mentality: Writers Block Copywriting Quotes Psychology
of Marketing Taking a Workcation to Think Health / Wealth / Love Test How to Interview Someone Get a Job or Start a Business?
You'll also get the complete table
of contents and index for the entire
book,
as well
as the full
text of all 22 endorsements that were received in time to include (several more have come in since then).
A review by ActiveHistory.ca describes the
book as an essential
text on the history
of Alberta's tar sands.
The Bible is a
book, and was «edited» by humans for the telling
of a good «story»,
as with any «good
book» there can be many (mis --RRB- interpretations
of the
text.
As your attention focuses on the reading — raising the book as you read reveals your focus — the text you hold will become the congregation's center of attention as wel
As your attention focuses on the reading — raising the
book as you read reveals your focus — the text you hold will become the congregation's center of attention as wel
as you read reveals your focus — the
text you hold will become the congregation's center
of attention
as wel
as well.
After reading several
of the posts on the «interpretation
of mythical
texts into a
book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to
as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a
book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a
book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum
To ignore these principles
of interpretation is to distort the
text just
as much
as if you ignored the principle
of reading poetry
as poetry with all the rich meaning
of figurative language and chose rather to read it like it was a science
text book.
In the Biblical Manuscript P72, dating from 175 - 200AD, and containing the entire
text of 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and Jude, in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity
of Jesus was NOT a construct
of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337)
as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his
book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching
of the disciples from day 1.
In order to reduce the need for war and conflict, and to improve conditions in impoverished countries, the USA should be distributing unlimited volumes
of the Koran / Quran (
as well
as the Bible and other popular
texts)-- but all the
books should be written or translated into the languages
of the local population.
Whether it is changing
text books to teach religion
as a «science,» making laws that prohibit stem - cell research which would without question help those in need, to stopping
of any kind
of gay rights, trying to put religion (christianity) into schools, a woman's right to choose, etc, etc...
In my new
book, «The American Bible: How Our Words Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation,» I explore 27
texts that have served
as «scripture»
of sorts in American public life.
In the
book, I make a brief but impassioned case for reading the
text with the prejudice
of love, a hermeneutic I believe was employed by Jesus, and,
as many reviewers have pointed out, a hermeneutic that Augustine also favored.
Fearful
of having their
books omitted from lists
of «acceptable»
texts, a number
of publishers have acquiesced to creationist demands in various ways: by considerably reducing the space given to discussion
of evolution, by referring to evolution
as «only a theory,» by including creationist materials, or by placing references to evolution in a final chapter which the teacher could conveniently Omit.
Using
books of the Bible
as their primary
texts, and following a set pattern, one person would read the
text in Hebrew, and another would interpret it into Greek, and then the
text would be explained and applied (cf. Acts 2:42; 13:14 - 15; 14:1 - 3; 15:21; 18:4; 19:8 - 10; etc.).
As to whether or not we must affirm that the flood encompassed the entire orb of the earth, the text would seem to teach this and subsequent texts would tend to corroborate this, but there is some flexibility with regards to the first eleven chapters of the Book of Genesis, as expressed in the encyclical «Humani Generis» of Pope Pius XI
As to whether or not we must affirm that the flood encompassed the entire orb
of the earth, the
text would seem to teach this and subsequent
texts would tend to corroborate this, but there is some flexibility with regards to the first eleven chapters
of the
Book of Genesis,
as expressed in the encyclical «Humani Generis» of Pope Pius XI
as expressed in the encyclical «Humani Generis»
of Pope Pius XII:
The Bible can't be used to verify claims any more than the Quran or the
Book of Mormon,
as all religious
texts first require a basic belief on the part
of the reader that they (the
texts) are right in order to be viewed
as such.
He suggested that one response might be for dioceses to produce authentically Catholic
text books to act
as a primary resource for teachers,
as long
as they did not «compromise the principles and syllabuses
of public examining boards».
Or do we need to do with the New Testament
as is sometimes done with the
Book of Daniel — parts
of it included in the
text as canonical, parts
of it relegated to an appendix
of Apocrypha?
Most
of the
text below is taken from: (Later in the
book, Marcus Borg explains the meaning
of the language
as understood biblically and by the early church)
I picked up mark l. Strauss, four portraits one jesus
text book as a compliment to my study
of the harmony
of the gospels and was introduced in the 2nd chapter to historical criticism.
My problems with this
book are the same problems I have with nearly all
books about biblical criticism: I believe the presuppositions
of most
of those who engage in biblical criticism are inherently flawed, and
as a result, short - circuit the creative thinking that is necessary to discover solutions to the so - called problems in the biblical
text.
A second edition
of Protestant - Catholic - Jew came out in 1960, but after that the
book was not re-published until 1983, when historians began to cite the
book as a descriptive
text of the 1950s.
The Yashts and minor
texts combined,
as they often are, form a kind
of abridged Avesta or smaller Avesta, called the Khordah Avesta which serves
as a
book of prayers for laymen.
An earlier version
of this
book was
of immense help to me
as I learned about the roles
of faith and works in the life
of the believer, and how to understand most
of the tough
texts in the Bible on this topic.
In this method, take notes on everything surrounding your decision, such
as lists
of pros and cons, notes on
books you're reading, God's messages to you through the Bible, conversations with others, recounts
of key events, copies
of important e - mails / letters or transcripts
of texts / chats / voicemails, questions you have, and so on.
Instead
of teaching the Bible
as a collection
of isolated
texts, each to be interpreted literally, they endeavored to treat each
book in the Bible
as a whole.
In a modest sense, this is the approach followed in this
book,
as we examine «
texts» in the world
of television and construct a «reading»
of them in order to surmise their meaning for society
as a whole.
We have questioned how a
book as cynical and pessimistic
as Ecclesiastes could have found its way into the canon, failing to see the
text's central affirmation
of our work and play
as gifts from God to be enjoyed.
For example, the first and second chapters
of the
book of Acts make it clear that Jesus's disciples were part
of the crowd assembled in Jerusalem for the first Pentecost — a crowd the
text identifies
as Jewish.
If the Psalms are to serve
as a
text that discloses a creative way
of being in the face
of death, it is important for a reader to remember how close death was to everyone in the original context
of the
book.
Nearly all religions claim the Bible
as part
of their «holy writings» but not all agree on
texts like the Quran or the
Book or Mormon.
Alcoholics Anonymous, being «spiritual, not religious,» doesn't use the Bible at all; rather it uses another sacred
text, the inspired Word
of God
as expressed through Bill Wilson, the Big
Book... Unlike the Oxford Group, which claimed salvation and redemption by Jesus through the Oxford Group, AA proclaims «recovery» by one s «Higher Power» through the Twelve Steps
of Alcoholics Anonymous (Ken Ragge, The Real AA: Behind the Myth
of 12 - Step Recovery [AZ: Sharp Press, 1998], pp. 82 - 83).
The
book is conceived and written
as a «companion» (that abused word), a knowledgeable companion whose sole reason for existence is to aid in understanding the
text of the Old Testament.
As for «jihad» itself, not only is the word «jihad» mentioned in several places within the their koran, such as the infamous Sura 9 («Verse of the Sword»), there are over 150 calls to «holy war» AKA «jihad: scattered throughout the entire text of this hateful book
As for «jihad» itself, not only is the word «jihad» mentioned in several places within the their koran, such
as the infamous Sura 9 («Verse of the Sword»), there are over 150 calls to «holy war» AKA «jihad: scattered throughout the entire text of this hateful book
as the infamous Sura 9 («Verse
of the Sword»), there are over 150 calls to «holy war» AKA «jihad: scattered throughout the entire
text of this hateful
book..
Not most importantly that since the bible is the most heavily researched
book in the history
of the world by wide orders
of magnitude, scholars have thoroughly examined textual criticism issues such
as this, and the Christian can rest assured that: — the bible we have is over 99 % original
text — none
of the verses under issue affect the Christian message
of salvation through faith in the atoning work
of Jesus on the cross at all, not even the smallest amount.
You can post quotes from and references to this
book all year long and it will not change the fact that: Yes, there are some practical words
of wisdom for peaceful human behavior in it (
as there are in most religious
texts), but just because this is true it does not make all
of the supernatural fantasies in it true.
I had a fascinating conversation with Max Stackhouse
of Andover - Newton Seminary who felt that one
of our greatest needs in the subject area
of this
book was for an examination
of the history
of preaching on certain
texts as the «Rich Young Ruler» to see how sermons related to different contexts.
So sacred was it held to be at the time
of the making
of the Code
of Manu, greatest
of the law
books, that it was therein decreed that a lowly Sudra, i.e., low caste man, who so much
as listened to the sacred
text would have molten metal poured into his ears, and his tongue cut out if he pronounced the sacred words
of the holy Vedas.1 «Whether such laws were ever actually enforced may be doubted.
I've noticed that many Christians see the Bible
as a
book that's chock full
of easy to follow laws and rules that tell you what to do (Paul said this so we must... they did this so we must...) and proof
texts (it says here that Jesus said that who ever is not for him is against him so I forbid you to listen to Britney Spears).
Similarly, questions about whether Jesus was a priest arise not because the documents present any legitimate reason even to raise the question, but because the
Book of Hebrews regards him
as high priest, and certain theological strains within Roman Catholicism have highlighted those
texts.
«2 Some
texts have gone so far in this direction that they have become
books «about science,» or present a smattering
of so many fields that they end
as superficial surveys.
The statement said that there was no credible evidence
of contact between Ancient Egyptian or Hebrew peoples and the New World,
as indicated by the
text of the
Book of Mormon.
Rather than seeing it
as a
book of proof
texts, it helps us see what God has been doing in the world, and what our role might be in carrying the story forward.
J. K. Elliott, who prepared the comprehensive translation
of such early
texts notes: «These apocryphal
books are
of importance
as historical witnesses to the beliefs, prayers, practices, and interests
of the society that produced and preserved them.
Catastrophic so far
as the overall impact
of Gerhardsson's work is concerned is that in a
book having some 325 pages
of text, only twelve
of those pages are devoted to a discussion
of the gospel tradition itself (pp. 324 — 35), and these pages include no exegesis whatever
of the
text of the synoptic tradition on the basis
of his hypothesis.
The
book reflects a Mennonite understanding
of the church
as a community
of reconciliation,
as stressed in scriptural
texts such
as Matthew 18 and John 20, wherein Jesus explicitly ties God's forgiveness
of people to their forgiveness
of others, especially in the Lord's Prayer.
A postmodern approach to the New Testament witness to Jesus» resurrection,
as it is developed by Marianne Sawicki in her
book Seeing the Lord: Ressurrection and Early Christian Practices, [10] is more efficacious in enabling access to the reality
of resurrection than any analysis
of the biblical
texts that is determined by a critical methodology founded on a Kantian epistemology.
The writing that most clearly and prominently displays the heart
of this integration, however, is his Liber regulae pastoralis (literally
Book of Pastoral Guidance), often translated
as Pastoral Care after the first two words
of the
text (Pastorolis curae) or asPastoralia or Concerning Pastoral Care (De pastorali cura).
The workshop employs a dynamic presentation
of the
texts of the ritual
books themselves
as the basis for a rich theological understanding
of the way in which the Word becomes flesh in and through thecelebration
of the Sacred Liturgy.