Sentences with phrase «of the admin act»
The criteria listed here were established in consultation with participating industries to give guidance on the interpretation of section 8 of the Admin Act and the requirements for seeking access to NRS funds:
http://www.agriculture.gov.au/
Note: Where an activity is only partially relevant to the purposes outlined under section 8 (1)(a)(iv) of the Admin Act, funding will apply in proportion to the relevance of the activity.
Information from NRS programmes that identifies particular people or their property is released only to government authorities (i.e. Australian, state or territory government authorities responsible for the monitoring or regulation of agricultural and veterinary chemical residues and contaminants), or to individuals approved by the department as being appropriate persons to be granted access to the information under paragraph 11 (2)(b) of the Admin Act.
All NRS revenue and expenditure passes through the NRS Special Account established under section 6 (2) of the Admin Act.
Not exact matches
It seems like they could save a lot of money (particularly the early round picks) by going the Lamar Jackson route of having your mom act as admin and getting a lawyer to look over any contract you sign, but I don't see a need for an agent until the player is a FA.
but i do expect this season to be more of transition - still fine tuning players positions an roles etc so there might be poor games, but if we win - we win that title admin gave me one thought: Y ’ all act like you never seen a white person before Jaws all on the floor like Pam and Tommy just burst in the door forgot the rest lol
Such profiles usually have photographs of beautiful women; but unfortunately, such profiles are managed by someone either with the knowledge of the admin aimed at perpetrating fraudulent acts.
Then he acted like he wanted parents involved in the process He gutted what was left of the good teachers and admin staff many were forced to retire.
The Act limited the amount an individual may be charged to $ 21 per $ 100 borrowed, inclusive of admin fees, but excluding default charges.
The High Court held that the Ministry of Justice would be acting unlawfully if it were to include mesothelioma claimants in reforms in the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) without a review and report on the likely impact, in R (on the application of Tony Whitson) v Justice Secretary [2014] EWHC 3044 (Admin).
DPP v Lennon [2006] EWHC 1201 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 147 (May) neatly illustrates the shortcomings of the Computer Misuse Act 1990 (CMA 1990) and its seeming inability to keep pace with technological development (see 156 NLJ 7248, p 1712).
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry and others (proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002)[2009] EWHC 1960 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 337 (Jul)
R (Superintendents» Association) v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police (Admin Court, 2013)[2013] EWHC Admin 2173 (Admin) John acted for Bedfordshire Police in its successful defence of a judicial review claim arising from the decision to require police officers to retire when they qualify for a full pension.
• Acting for the successful Claimant in R (on the application of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC 1502 (Admin), a challenge to guidance from the defendant Secretary of State which sought to prohibit the administering authorities of the local government pension schemes from adopting policies of boycott, divestment and sanction against foreign nations (led by Nigel Giffin QC).
Civil Nuclear Police Federation v Civil Nuclear Police Authority (Admin Court)[2016] EWHC 2186 (Admin) John acted for the CNPA in a judicial review concerning the retirement age of officers in the Civil Nuclear Constabulary.
• Acting for Leicester City Council in R (on the application of Jewish Human Rights watch) v Leicester City Council [2016] EWHC 1512 (Admin), a challenge to the adoption of motions by the defendant local authorities expressing support for the boycott of Israel (led by Andrew Sharland);
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD (pursuant to the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005)[2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 15 (Aug)
The decision in R (E) v JFS [2008] EWHC 1665 (Admin) has been championed as clarifying the meaning of race discrimination under the Race Relations Act 1977 (RRA 1976).
If a firm has never had a security assessment, they should get one and act on the assessor's recommendations to remove themselves from the category of low - hanging fruit by addressing basic technical issues like obsolete / unpatched software and default admin passwords (both of which are an all - too - common occurrence on first - time engagements).
In July 2017 Gurprit acted as junior counsel in R (on the application of Durand Academy Trust) v OFSTED and the Secretary of State (2017) EWHC 2097 (Admin), an important Judicial Review case; successfully challenging Ofsted's decision to place a school in special measures.
R (R) v National Police Chiefs» Council; Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 2586 (Admin) Junior to Kate Gallafent QC; an Article 8 challenge to the provision of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act that all convictions and cautions be self - disclosed when applying for the office of police constable (instructed by the Government Legal Department)
R (Harris) v Broads Authority [2016] EWHC 799 (Admin) Junior to Nigel Giffin QC; acted for the Broads Authority defending it's branding of the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads as a national park, raising issues of vires, statutory prohibitions and fair consultation (instructed by NPLaw)
R (on the application of Press Standards Board of Finance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2013] EWHC 3824 (Admin) Acted as junior to Nathalie Lieven QC in this challenge by Pressbof to the Privy Council's rejection of their application for the formation of a self - regulatory body for the press in the wake of the Leveson inquiry.
R (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) v Coventry City Council [2014] EWHC 2089 (Admin), [2014] BLGR 616 Hickinbottom J ruled that the Council had not acted irrationally or failed to take account of relevant considerations when it made a loan of # 14.4 m to the company that manages the Ricoh Arena in Coventry.
written by admin \ \ tags: community of property, equalization of net family property, exclude from net family property, family law act, family law act canlii, marriage contract, pre-nup, prenup, prenuptial agreement
R (Collins) v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 996 (Admin) QBD (Admin Ct), February 11 2016 (2016) 19 CCL Rep 494 Given allegations of financial impropriety against the interested party, the local authority had acted lawfully in suspending its position as an accredited provider of direct payment support services to persons in need of social care
Following Tomlinson, on 26 April 2005, in Hampstead Heath Winter Swimming Club and another v The Corporation of London and another [2005] EWHC 713 (Admin) Mr Justice Stanley Burnton (as he then was) was unimpressed by the corporation's purported prohibition of swimming in the mixed pond on Hampstead Heath, for fear of prosecution under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, s 3.
R (on the application of CXF (acting by his mother, his litigation friend)-RRB- v Central Bedfordshire Council and another [2017] EWHC 2311 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 77 (Sep)
R (Islington Borough Council & others) v Mayor of London & others [2013] EWHC 4142 (Admin) Acting for Inner London local authorities in challenge to Mayor of London's decision to close fire stations
R (on the application of Bristol City Council) v Bristol City Magistrates Court [2009] EWHC 625 (Admin) leading authority on the determination of premises licence applications under the Licensing Act 2003
R (Keep Wythenshawe Special Ltd) v NHS Central Manchester CCG [2016] EWHC 17 (Admin) Acting for NHS England, as an interested party, in a challenge to the reorganisation of hospital services in Greater Manchester
In such a case, although the test of reasonableness is objective, the justices must consider any explanation offered by the defendant, for example, why veterinary attention was not sought, when considering whether the defendant acted reasonably or unreasonably (see R (on the application of RSPCA) v C [2006] EWHC 1069 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 299 (Mar)-RRB-.
Underhill J noted the decision of the Divisional Court in R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Keen (1990) 3 Admin LR 180 which found that the secretary of state did have the power necessary — in that instance under the broad statutory powers in the National Health Service Act 1977 for forward planning pending anticipated legislation.
Shepherd Offshore Ltd v North Tyneside Council; R (Shepherd Offshore Ltd) v North Tyneside Council (2013, TCC and Admin Court) Acted for defendant authority in two sets of proceedings (one a claim under the Public Contracts Regulations 2006, the other a JR challenge to the alleged grant of state aid) which challenged arrangements for installation of an industrial crane.
Bruton v Governor of Swaleside Prison [2017] EWHC 704 (Admin) David acted for the Defendants in this judicial review relating to legally privileged mail in the prison estate.
R (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Oxfordshire County Council [2017] EWHC 1295 (Admin), [2017] 1 WLR 3641, QBD, May 26 2017 David acted for Oxfordshire County Council in this judicial review concerning age assessment and whether it was unlawful for the SSHD to detain pending transfer to a safe third country.
R (Ghulam & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 2639 (Admin) Acting successfully for the Secretary of State in 3 - linked judicial review test cases challenging the rate of financial support for adult and dependant child asylum seekers.
R (Justice for Health Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Health; R (BMA) v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWHC 2338 (Admin) Acting successfully for the Secretary of State in defending various judicial review and competition law challenges to the introduction of a new national model contract for junior doctors in the NHS.
Watson v HMCTS National Taxing Team [2012] EWHC 2865 (Admin)(3 October 2012) Acted for the National Taxing Team in this Divisional Court challenge to its approach to calculating a payment pursuant to an order under s. 16 of the Prosecution of Offenders Act.
• Proficient in all activities related to maintaining the integrity and acquisition of medical records • Capable of adhering to the Patient Privacy Act by maintaining confidentiality of records • Upbeat courteous personality with a helpful attitude towards patients, colleagues and admin • Exceptional organizational, record keeping and communication skills
Not to sound disrespectful, but typically when a deal is struck, copies of all pages go the law office acting for each side, along with those to the REALTOR (r) office in each case, whose admin staff has a copy.