Indeed, the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct, in the «application» section, provides that the code applies to all full - time judges, and goes on to define «judges» as «anyone who is authorized to perform judicial functions, including... a member
of the administrative law judiciary.»
Military judges often choose to serve as members
of an administrative law judiciary, where they are able to continue their service and use their highly honed judicial skills through a government organization.
Not exact matches
While the
judiciary helped to shape federal special education
laws, it now plays a surprisingly limited role in their implementation - in part because
of the development
of quasi-judicial
administrative procedures to channel disputes.
Legal educators teaching Contracts,
Administrative Law, Mediation and Dispute Resolution can not ignore the developments in their areas that rely on technology as a core tool to apply legal principles, to interact with the
judiciary and the government, to parse through an accumulation
of knowledge and to reshape legal processes and procedures.
The judicial tribunals on which this book focuses are the same executive branch organizations that, as noted above, were called «judicial tribunals» in the McRuer Report; the same organizations that, in 1990, Ed Ratushny's Report on the Independence
of Federal
Administrative Tribunals and Agencies described as «tribunals which are adjudicative» and for which it recommended the label «tribunal» be exclusively reserved; and the same organizations that in 1991 the late Chief Justice
of Canada Antonio Lamer, in a keynote speech to the conference
of the Council
of Canadian
Administrative Tribunals, referred to as bodies that are «created to operate essentially as adjudicators... in a manner that is similar to the function
of the
judiciary... [and] expected to dispense justice in the same sense as the courts
of law.»
For too long in this area
of law, judges have set out operational rules based on their own personal views
of the proper relationship between the
judiciary and
administrative decision - makers and their own freestanding opinions — not well - settled doctrine and well - accepted principles
of a longstanding and durable nature.