The vote also comes as a number of high - profile education issues come to a head this year in Albany, including withering criticism of the state's rollout
of the Common Core assessments.
New York State Education Commissioner John King says the adjustments originally ensured that no teacher is unfairly removed as a result
of Common Core assessments.
In the second of two blogposts, John Larmer of the Buck Institute for Education reviews how the eight essential elements of PBL can fit (sometimes neatly, sometimes not) within the expectations
of Common Core assessment.
An article in the Fall 2016 issue of Education Next, «The Politics
of the Common Core Assessments,» by Ashley Jochim and Patrick McGuinn, looks at political pressures within the states that are affecting state involvement with the standards and tests.
The federally subsidized tests aligned to Common Core and developed by the SBAC and PARCC consortia were intended as the rigorous metrics for this stronger accountability regime (see «The Politics
of the Common Core Assessments,» features, Fall 2016).
That undertaking became steadily more controversial, however, as the standards were implemented and tests were devised to measure student performance against them (see «The Politics
of the Common Core Assessments,» features, Fall 2016).
Common Core was and remains a political concern, and the number of states planning to use the Common Core — aligned PARCC and Smarter Balanced assessments dropped from 45 in 2011 to just 20 that actually used one of the two tests in 2016 (see «The Politics
of the Common Core Assessments,» features, Fall 2016).
The Boston - based Pioneer Institute (which, in fairness, has made its opposition to the common core well known) estimates a cost of $ 6.87 billion for technology to bring schools up to par with the requirements
of common core assessments.
Will the ACT and College Board versions
of Common Core assessments be true «next - generation» tests that probe deeper understanding and more sophisticated («higher - order») skills in more revealing ways?
And, of course, both Kentucky and New York have already concocted and deployed their own versions
of Common Core assessments — possibly but not necessarily interim models.
New York, for example, went from a statewide reading proficiency rate of 55.1 % in 2012 to a statewide proficiency rate of 31.3 % in 2013 following the implementation
of the Common Core Assessments.
Oklahoma isn't pulling out
of the Common Core assessment consortium PARCC, but state education officials last week announced plans to design their own test.
Topics addressed include everything from development
of the Common Core assessments to opposition to the standards.
Instead of molding to the traditional «fill in the bubble» format,
some of the Common Core assessments will be administered on computers and feature more open - ended questions.
The report recommends that colleges add the results
of Common Core assessment tests to the measures by which they gauge students» eligibility for admission and financial aid; that they help make sure primary and secondary schools teach the things needed to succeed in higher education, and that the Common Core tests measure them; and that schools of education show future teachers how to prepare their students for college and careers.
As the release
of Common Core assessments grows nearer, many educators will be required to take a closer look at their own internal assessment practices and see where there is room for improvement.
«An Overview
of the Common Core Assessments.»
This week in a blog entitled, The Opt Out End Game, the President of the National Education Association, Lily Eskelsen Garcia, joined AFT President Randi Weingarten, in her support for the legal right of a parent to opt their child out
of the Common Core assessment.
Not exact matches
The Democratic - led Assembly this month passed a measure that would impose a two - year delay in aspects
of Common Core when it comes to student and teacher
assessment.
The Democratic - led Assembly previously approved a two - year delay in implementing aspects
of Common Core when it comes to teacher evaluations and student
assessment.
It is unclear whether federal acting secretary
of education John King — New York's former state education c ommissioner who championed the
Common Core and helped usher in the use
of teacher evaluations tied to state
assessments under No Child Left Behind and the federal Race To The Top grant program — will give his blessing.
This past school year, English and math state
assessments included elements
of the
Common Core State Standards Initiative.
The appropriate approach to
assessment will vary between subjects and a range
of solutions may come forward, for example, extension papers offering access to higher grades alongside a
common core.
Leaders
of Long Island's anti-testing movement, whose boycott efforts captured national attention last year, are expanding their campaign
of encouraging parents and students to opt out
of the state's standardized
Common Core assessments, scheduled for next month.
The anti-testing movement, which encourages parents to opt their kids out
of the state's standardized
Common Core assessments, is getting some support from Assembly Education Committee Chairwoman Cathy Nolan.
More than half
of Long Island students eligible to take the state
Common Core test in English Language Arts refused to take the exam this week, according to a Newsday survey
of public school districts ending Thursday, the third and final day
of the
assessment.
While Mr. Gamberg and the school board have agreed there are some good elements to
Common Core, they've also been one
of the more outspoken school districts on the North Fork to oppose the state's mandate that ties teacher evaluations to state
assessment scores.
The state's rapid switch to
Common Core - based
assessments led to widespread boycotts
of the annual tests given to third - through eighth - graders.
New York State Board
of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch and State Education Commissioner John King released results Thursday
of the April 2014
Common Core assessments for grade 3 - 8 math and English Language Arts.
In the final days
of the New York legislative session, which ended last week in Albany, Governor Andrew Cuomo and legislative leaders reached an agreement on a two - year delay in the teacher
assessments to be based on the
Common Core testing.
Hawkins and Jones want the state to opt out
of Common Core and opt into individual
assessments like the Performance Based Assessment Tasks (PBATs) used by 26 public schools in New York City.
Albany, N.Y. (WBEN / AP)- New York public school students will spend less time taking the unpopular
Common Core assessments that have been boycotted by large numbers
of parents in recent years.
The task force appointed by New York governor Andrew Cuomo to overhaul the
Common Core standards the state adopted in 2010 issued a set
of recommendations on Thursday that, if adopted, will see school curricula and
assessment standards move further away from the
Common Core, the New York Times reports.
The New York State Board
of Regents is expected to act on two committee reports Tuesday, calling for a delay the impact
of Common Core - related state
assessments on educators and students and reducing the level
of local school district testing associated with the new teacher evaluation law and higher standards for teaching and learning.
In the go - go world
of Common Core, Smarter Balance and other
assessments, when do we focus on what kids want to learn?
If the new
Common Core assessments set the high school graduation bar at true college readiness — meaning students are on track to take credit bearing courses from day one — the country is likely to learn that scarcely one - third
of all students, and many fewer low - income students, are at that level now.
Educators are currently under a great deal
of pressure to successfully implement the
Common Core — pressure that is mounting as high - stakes are attached to the
Common Core assessments that in many places have yet to be developed or field - tested.
The power
of that approach was amplified by another school - improvement effort: Skandera's department had also been reworking the state's end -
of - course exams and early - grade
assessments, as part
of its efforts to implement
Common Core standards.
And with ongoing implementation
of Common Core standards and
assessments, Skandera pursued what she calls «truth telling,» or being honest about school and student performance after too many years
of failing to acknowledge a painful reality.
And when trying to implement large - scale initiatives like the
Common Core State Standards that require rethinking professional learning, curriculum and instructional materials, family engagement activities,
assessment and other aspects
of the education system, collaboration is particularly important.
The downward shift in student scores in the first years
of the new,
Common Core - aligned
assessments results from that new bar — aligned to the higher standards.
In 2010, the U.S. Department
of Education awarded $ 330 million to the Partnership for Assessment
of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) to develop
assessments aligned to the
common core in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 through 8 and high school.
The state contracted with private, nonprofit organizations to develop new curricula aligned to the
common core, developed a web site that included sample lessons and professional - development materials, and then developed a new
assessment tied to the standards and administered it in the spring
of 2013 — two years before most states had planned to put new tests in place.
As one
of the two state - led collaboratives developing new
assessments that align with the
Common Core Standards, PARCC received a $ 186 million Race to the Top grant.
In addition, a recent survey
of principals conducted by the National Association
of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) found that
of the 1,100 principals from 14
Common Core states who responded, more than 80 percent agree that the
Common Core has the potential to improve conceptual understanding, increase student skill mastery and create more meaningful
assessments of students.
We in the PBL world are really getting a lot
of validation in the last few years, in terms
of the direction
Common Core has said we need to go, and the new burning interest in performance
assessment in the larger field.
Available resources include tools and resources that educators can use in ELA classrooms and mathematics classrooms, information about shifts in instruction related to the
Common Core, and guidance and tools to help evaluate alignment
of instruction,
assessment, and materials to CCSS shifts.
The level
of activity states are engaged in, the possibilities offered by technology and cross state collaborations, and the extraordinary effort to develop new
assessments all suggest that the
common core standards might generate some real changes in classroom instruction.
Supporters
of the
common core standards have also been concerned that the base
of support could erode when the first results are released from the new
assessments designed to measure student performance against them.
Providing a more honest
assessment of student performance was one
of the goals
of the
Common Core initiative and the new tests created by states that are meant to align to the new, higher standards.