Sentences with phrase «of the alarmist climate»

«A Devastating Reassessment of Alarmist Climate Science Two Examples of the Enormous Real Costs of «Green» Power»

Given the preponderance of alarmist climate models that predicted significant warming, this fact alone should be reason enough for regulators and scientists to reassess their conclusions.

The Swedish professor tells the BAZ that he became a skeptic of alarmist climate science early on because «the [UN] IPCC always depicted the facts on the subject falsely» and «grossly exaggerated the risks of sea level rise» and that the IPCC «excessively relied on shaky computer models instead of field research.»

The result is a continuation of the alarmist climate rhetoric we have seen for years.

«Where the 2016 Presidential Election May Come Out on Climate A Devastating Reassessment of Alarmist Climate Science»

Not long ago a University of Graz Professor called for the death penalty for scientists who did not agree with the visions of alarmist climate scientists, who have dominated the media and public scene with scare stories of super-storms and Biblical sea level rise for 15 years.

Steeped in dogma and ideology, insisting your view is infallible, you are the quintessence of alarmist climate science.

Not exact matches

Ebell has fought against climate policies for years, and he often suggests that climate scientists are working to advance their careers by promoting alarmist research that exaggerates the pace of climbing temperatures.

Jean - Marc Touzard, director of research on innovation at the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) in Montpellier and co-coordinator of a national program to assess the impact of climate change on the wine industry, found the PNAS paper too alarmist.

... It is the eighteen climate alarmists who appear to be unaware of «what is happening to our planet's climate,» as well as the vast amount of research that has produced that knowledge.

Alarmists have drawn some support for increased claims of tropical storminess from a casual claim by Sir John Houghton of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that a warmer world would have more evaporation, with latent heat providing more energy for disturbances.

Rudolf Kipp of the Science Skeptical site has a post on the latest climate predictions of Hans - Joachim Schellnhuber, the Director of the alarmist Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Researchclimate predictions of Hans - Joachim Schellnhuber, the Director of the alarmist Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchClimate Impact Research (PIK).

While German politicians, alarmist scientists, activists, and media are staying super-glued stuck on stupid, i.e. remaining mired in the stupidity of dogmatism and closed - mindedness, the climate debate and controversy in Germany is, well, shall we say, heating the hell up.Mark the following time and place on your calender: Wednesday, 25 May 2011, 10 pm.

Alarmist site that 98 % of climate scientist believe in climate change.

Climate alarmists have long anticipated Earth's polar regions to symbolize the proverbial canary in the coal mine when it comes to witnessing the impacts of CO2 - induced climate Climate alarmists have long anticipated Earth's polar regions to symbolize the proverbial canary in the coal mine when it comes to witnessing the impacts of CO2 - induced climate climate change.

I see another alarmist post from The Climate Action Tracker claims that temperatures are going to rise by 3C above pre-industrial levels by 2100AD, a ludicrous claim that requires.35 C / decade rate of increase.

In any case, you are free to ignore «alarmist» propaganda and pay attention only to the refereed publications of climate scientists, whose skepticism of unfounded hypotheses can be relied on.

Paul D... As a part - time alarmist I would answer that with a little bit of extrapolation added to some warnings of climate scientists I guess the worst case scenario at least includes the total collapse of the WAIS, creating tsunamis at least all over the Pacific rim, the subsequent sea level rise of c. 7m will destroy most of the remaining harbours, communication centers near coasts, next up would be the melting of the collapsed ice in the southern ocean altering the climate of the entire southern hemisphere, making it near - impossible to guess what areas are good for similar agriculture as before, leading to massive movements of people.

«Climate scientists are all a bunch of alarmists who lie about the situation and destroy data».

Dr. Richard Lindzen — Professor of Meteorology at M.I.T., member, the National Research Council Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, says global warming alarmists «are trumpeting catastrophes that couldn't happen even if the models were right.»

Anyone interested in the present and recent RealClimate postings will likely want to visit the Wall Street Journal's OpinionJournal.com today, where there's a link to an op - ed by MIT's Richard Lindzen that's headlined this way: «FREE INQUIRY: Climate of Fear: Global - warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.»

Look at it this way, back in 2007 and 2008 when I was trying to get it through people's heads this was an existential threat — mostly to Peak Oilists who were dismissive of the danger of climate and climate deniers — I was an «alarmist» who knew nothing.

It is notable that while the climate alarmist movement is funded by billions of public funds and the skeptic side is funded by a few million at best and the alarmists are losing badly, the explanation is found in credibility.

Despite his evident lack of skill to evaluate the multiple lines of evidence accumulated by 2 centuries of climate science, DDS has made it clear he believes the lopsided consensus of working climate scientists is «alarmist».

The WHOI's voyage to the bottom of the sea shows it is climate alarmists who are skating on thin ice.»

The willingess of climate alarmists to beat critics over the head with such «facts» is what inspires counter-alarmism.

Thanks to RealClimate for helping the rest of us understand climate, but doesn't it make sense to be «alarmist» when alarming things keep happening «ahead of schedule?»

Climate alarmists are alarmed, scaremongers scared, for their predictions of catastrophe are not coming true.

... Climate of Fear — Global - warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.

Amid the constant alarmist bickering over the role of CO2 in our planet's continued shifting of climate whether caused or accelerated by human activity and similar hair splitting, the true threats to our status - quo go un-heralded as the siren of alarm numbs our sensibilities.

CO2 Science misrepresents Doran's study as a «major blow to the CO2 - induced global warming hypothesis... many a climate alarmist jumped on the global warming bandwagon... however, the bottom began to fall out of the poorly constructed bandwagon, as the evidentiary glue that held it together began to weaken.»

After spending a good deal of time and effort researching the epistemological issues behind the climate controversy in preparation for my book, I concluded that the essence of the «alarmist» position is precisely the argument you're attempting to make.

Lawson himself had a crack at climate researchers a couple of months ago in «The Independent» newspaper describing them as alarmists.

The Guardian (UK left wing newspaper) does sometimes over state climate change (alarmist cry from the right most often) but its and the Independents coverage of AGW is fair and balanced relative to the DT sometimes.

It is extremely hard to find genuine climate scientists who ARE alarmist; wheras it is of course easy to find «skeptics» who claim that all AGW research is alarmist, and that this is essential for funding.

In reality, no climate models predict any probability of warming over 10 C. Of all the alarmist lies, this one takes the first prize hands dowof warming over 10 C. Of all the alarmist lies, this one takes the first prize hands dowOf all the alarmist lies, this one takes the first prize hands down.

The first group of authors tries to label the climate science community as an army of influential catastrophists, alarmists, and profiteers — glossing over the reality that the vast body of climate science and climate policy analysis is, as in any field, full of gradations (not to mention that there's not much evidence of substantial influence).

He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the global warming debate.

Vaclav Klaus, at the skeptics» conference, spoke of «climate alarmists and their fellow travelers in politics and the press».

As people say «follow the money» or in this case, «follow the money and the social policy and who wants the power» and one can see, if they wipe away the veil of fear the alarmists are stoking, that this is more about power and politics than about climate.

According to the latest panic attack from climate alarmists, the production of four major crops — maize, wheat, rice and soybeans — will fall by 23 percent by the 2050s thanks to global warming.

With the release of the 5000 emails, all of the data and articles provided to support climate alarmist charges are suspect, and anyone who offers them is not worth taking to time to debate.

And if it is within natural variability... then the climate alarmists» AGW / CO2 / planetary catastrophe hypothesis fails for lack of any proof.

Now the western climate alarmists are so damn dumb that they think that somehow wind has got more reliable after 400 years of getting rid of wind power for the very reasons of it's abysmally low and completely unpredictable and unreliable power output in what was an industrializing society.

The almost complete and abject failure of the climate alarmists and their models to actually correctly predict anything at all relating to the global climate after some 25 years of research if we take Hansen's infamous Congressional meeting in 1988 as the starting point for climate alarmist research, has been well documented in numerous places including here..

Note that the first few of the links below are to blog posts written by concerned climate scientists, whom the climate change denialists call «alarmists.»

The international climate machine is about to achieve a new degree of alarmist absurdity, basically speeding up as they hit the wall.

In spite of his rather mild (in comparison to many sceptics» claims) position, Lomborg was the subject of more vitriol from the alarmist propaganda machine than perhaps any other climate - sceptic / denier / realist figure.

In fact, it seems that the less the climate changes, the louder the voices of the climate alarmists get.

«The GHG «theory» based on CO2 is a thermodynamic impossibility» Yes, the climate alarmists peddle their pseudoscience claiming that the ghe works by transferring heat / thermal energy from the cold atmosphere to the warmer surface of the earth, more heat / thermal energy than is transferred by the Sun.