You are an excelent representative
of the Alarmist movement, and that speaks volumes for the intellectual power of your movement.
You are asking, in effect, that skeptics simply «shut up and sit down,» that they concede as being true the most flawed and unlikely assumptions
of the alarmist movement, and that they endorse policies that are wholly unnecessary and extremely costly.
If you have any evidence let alone a large body of it, let's have it, you'd become the doyen
of the alarmist movement overnight.
Not exact matches
As Charles T. Rubin argues in The Green Crusade: Rethinking the Roots
of Environmentalism, unscientific,
alarmist forecasts, irresponsible as they are, are not the greatest failing
of the Green
movement.
I respect Van Engen's conservative word
of caution, not that
of an
alarmist, but
of an informed authentic mission practitioner, «In the twenty - first century Evangelical mission agencies are becoming increasingly committed and involved in humanitarian and compassion ministries, children - at - risk
movements, and so on.
Paul D... As a part - time
alarmist I would answer that with a little bit
of extrapolation added to some warnings
of climate scientists I guess the worst case scenario at least includes the total collapse
of the WAIS, creating tsunamis at least all over the Pacific rim, the subsequent sea level rise
of c. 7m will destroy most
of the remaining harbours, communication centers near coasts, next up would be the melting
of the collapsed ice in the southern ocean altering the climate
of the entire southern hemisphere, making it near - impossible to guess what areas are good for similar agriculture as before, leading to massive
movements of people.
It is notable that while the climate
alarmist movement is funded by billions
of public funds and the skeptic side is funded by a few million at best and the
alarmists are losing badly, the explanation is found in credibility.
Methinks a personality from the School
of Psychology would be better qualified to discuss the extracurricular activity
of the «crazed sex poodle» who leads the
alarmist movement.
If you're not a global warming geek, the point
of the material is that we have apparent — and I only say apparent at this point — written admissions
of cooking the books, among other nastiness, by the leading names in the global warming
alarmist movement.
However, that does not mean that
alarmists and the establishment forces building up and exploiting the
movement to centralize and expand their control over the planet have any intention
of giving up.
It has been there since the beginning
of the climate
alarmist movement.
I was very skeptical
of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (though not the possibility
of some AGW) from the moment I heard about it as a major political
movement, because it «smelled» to much like the
Alarmist «Population Bomb» and «Peek Oil»
movements, and was being pushed by many
of the same kind
of people.
The leading lights
of the climate
alarmist movement (who up until then were extremely popular) stacked the peer review panels, subverted the IPCC using tricks and «kited» citations, and in some cases even committed crimes.
But the installation
of wind farms has opened their eyes to the strange politics that lies behind their construction, and to the
alarmist excesses
of the environmental
movement.
Three events have rocked the
movement and caused
alarmists to go into a state
of alarm.
The
alarmist appeals to urgency and the anti-humanism
of this
movement reflect the poverty
of ideas in the political sphere; they are typical
of the way in which political leaders justify themselves today.
This CAGW doctrine
of the climate
alarmists has to be one
of the most ill - founded scientifically and ridiculous doctrines ever proclaimed by a large
movement pretending to be based on science in the history
of the world.
According to Taylor, «This newest round
of global warming alarmism — with global warming activists and their willfully ignorant media allies attempting to dupe people into believing global warming is causing a decline in wheat harvests — is a perfect illustration
of all that is wrong with the
alarmist global warming
movement.»