Sentences with phrase «of the best paper publications»

Convenience & lower price make the «prestige» of the best paper publications irrelevant.

Not exact matches

Dr. Loughlin has published empirical papers in the Journal of Experimental Psychology, the Journal of Organizational Behavior, the Journal of Applied Psychology, and the Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, as well as co-authoring book chapters on work stress, workplace health and safety, and the quality of youth employment (several of these publications have been with her students).

This issue again brought the Century into conflict with the denomination's most influential papers — the Christian Standard and the newly conservative Christian Evangelist, formerly the publication of well - known liberal editor J. H. Garrison.

Whilst she has a well credentialed scientific track record having published 197 papers (145 since 2004), cited 6403 times with an «H» index of 44, her translation of much of this work into highly successful consumer publications has been notable.

Amelia Bay announces the publication of a new white paper: «To a Tea: Building a Better Iced Tea,» written to assist beverage manufacturers in making the proper decisions when it comes to formulating RTD iced tea.

Since this month's publication of my paper «The Burden of Suboptimal Breastfeeding in the United States» in Pediatrics with Arnold Reinhold, I'm often asked by reporters what the US can do better to improve our breastfeeding rates.

«If the Education Secretary genuinely wishes England to do as well as countries such as Finland, to which he frequently refers in the White Paper, he should follow its example by replacing the inspection system with school self evaluation, refrain from the publication of results by school League Tables and the setting of narrow performance targets and allow teachers to choose their own method of teaching reading.

As for publishing 4 papers in 4 years of PhD study... well I think this encourages too many irrelevant publications with too narrow a scope, and likely of little contribution to science.

The paper, published in the online version of Risk Analysis, a publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, was co-authored by Cova with colleagues Philip E. Dennison, Dapeng Li, and Frank Drews, also of University of Utah, as well as Laura K. Siebeneck of University of North Texas and Michael K. Lindell of University of Washington.

Then they mapped out the millions of citations to those papers, and searched for a statistical model that best predicted scientists» future success based on their early publication history.

If both bodies demanded that applications should be backed by no more than six papers, researchers would have an incentive to minimise their number of publications with better integrated, related work and better tested ideas in their more important papers.

«Instead of competing for publication, we wanted our papers to leverage each other and reflect our commitment to the greater good.»

Knowing an author's overall number of papers and total number of citations helps compute an approximated value of their h - index, which was named after the American physicist J.E. Hirsch in 2005 and measures the overall number of a scientist's publications as well as their quality and number of citations.

«He was a very good scientist, but something happened and he got into this business of duplicating papers,» says Chris Pickles, a metallurgist at Queen's who raised concerns about Smith's publication practices after spotting some duplications under Smith's name while searching an online database.

Eberle has written numerous publications on professional development, life planning, and policy change, including co-authoring a white paper summary of the 2015 Future of Biomedical Graduate and Postdoctoral Training (FOBGAPT) symposium, which presented recommended steps for curricular reform and better practices to support postdocs and graduate students.

Applications, assembled as single PDF files, should contain a complete resume, cover letter describing research interests and goals, full list of publications, copies of up to three relevant scientific papers, as well as the names and contact information of three references (expected to provide letters of recommendation).

Authors will benefit from the robust journal activities including very rapid review (average time to decision is less than 23 days, 14 days to online publication), high visibility and impact (papers publicized on journal website, monthly newsletters, Facebook, Twitter, 2011 impact factor 3.368,), and author services (connection to nomenclature services, pre-publication annotation of data for submission to data resources and repositories, as well as video and other alternative content as part of the embedded content).

His technical contributions and achievements have been recognized with several prestigious awards: he has received Technical Achievement Awards from all three major international organizations in the field (IEEE, IEE, and EURASIP), the Society Award of the IEEE Signal Processing society (which is the highest level award bestowed by the said society), and several important best paper awards including the Baker Prize which is presented to the author (s) of the most outstanding paper that appeared in all IEEE publications.

He is leading the publication of paper - based and interactive eLearning materials as well as the management of relations with other schools, universities, and firms.

In selecting papers for publication, Fitzhugh said, he looks for evidence of knowledge, thought, and good writing.

In the year ending in January 2012, the American Association of Publishers reported that e-book sales had risen more than 49.4 % in the adult books category, 475.1 % in the children's and young adult category, and 150.7 % in the religious publications category.5 We at the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project reported that ownership of e-book readers among adults age 18 and older had nearly doubled from 10 % of the population to 19 % over the holiday gift - giving season at the end of 2011, and ownership of tablet computers had surged a similar amount.6 In the final week of 2011 the e-book version of 42 of the top - selling 50 books on USA Today's best - seller book list was outselling the paper version of the same book.7

They're also very good with having books that come out in paper and ebook format at the same time be available on the day of publication or even for preorder.

Its essence is simple: it compares the text of essays, coursework or research paper with the database of the online sources, with the other students» works as well as with publications and highlights those places, which are repetitions of texts from other sources, and calculates the percentage of such duplications in the submitted work.

Miner will present documentation of his excursion to the Georgian Bay region that will include video, works on paper, as well as the launch of a risograph - print publication.

The acquisition encompasses photographs, source material for Hammond's art as well as original artworks, personal correspondence, drafts of publications, professional papers, a slide registry devoted to lesbian artists and much more.

This exhibition celebrates the publication of Peter Cain, the first complete monograph on the artist's work, featuring essays by Beau Rutland, Richard Meyer, and Collier Schorr, and illustrated with over eighty full - color plates of Cain's paintings and works on paper, as well as photographs of his studios and other archival material, most published here for the first time.

Perhaps there should also be some new routines recommended for journalists — like a check list (such as checking the publication history of the scientists, checking with other scientists, reading the whole paper, etc) for ensuring good reporting.

It's notable that Lewis said this in a chat recorded weeks ago, well before publication of the new Science paper — «The Technology Path to Deep Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cuts by 2050: The Pivotal Role of Electricity.»

And putting out a release on a mashup of published and unpublished work is, at best, bound to create confusion and — at worst — could undermine the publication prospects for the pending paper.

All do circulate their working papers with some colleagues and friends, but wider consultation with the scientific community would be much better, and would also facilitate the process of publication.

The folks at RealClimate.org have picked the paper apart pretty successfully, demonstrating some fundamental flaws (the authors ignored new information when old datasets suited their purpose better), but the Journal of Climatology is a reputable publication and, in accepting this paper, it accords a certain degree of credibility to the authors» findings.

My assertion is based on having written a lot of papers for publication and from having done a lot of reading on the ethics of proper publication (books, journal policies, institute policies, etc.) My views are particularly well stated by Wilson (the chemist, father of Nobel prize winner) in his seminal book on Science Research Methods.

Good practices and «lessons learned» in urban agriculture programmes and urban food policies are highlighted in different publications and working papers published by RUAF (see the RUAF Publications section of thipublications and working papers published by RUAF (see the RUAF Publications section of thiPublications section of this web site).

Since the NOAA paper's publication, several studies as well as a reanalysis of the original NOAA work have affirmed the finding that there has been no hiatus in global warming.

I'm sure you know very well that peer review is by definition gatekeeping; in this case it's closing the gate against pieces of junk * scholarship * like that from McKitrick or the example that the hacked emails were talking about, the execrable Soon & Baliunas paper whose publication resulted in half a dozen editors resigning from the journal in protest.

This newsletter discusses the publishing of rivers climate change indicators for the British Columbia (BC) Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, engineering design values for Island Health, progress on the development of the Climate Tool for Engineers, new partnerships with the Blueberry Council of BC and the Comox Valley Regional District, a paper on projected changes to summer mean wet bulb globe temperatures led by Chao Li, a Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society article on extreme wildfire risk in the Fort McMurray area by Megan Kirchmeier - Young, a staff profile on Dr. Gildas Dayon, the PCIC Climate Seminar Series, a welcome to doctoral student Yaheng Tan, the release of PCIC's 2016 - 2017 Corporate Report, the release of a Science Brief on snowmelt and drought, the publishing of Climate Change Projections for the Cowichan Valley Regional District and State of the Physical, Biological and Selected Fishery Resources of Pacific Canadian Marine Ecosystems in 2016, as well as peer - reviewed publications since the last newsletter.

He tried his best to block the publication of your paper, and now he willfully distorts the results of your paper to make them appear to support the original (incorrect) Steig et al results.

At the top of this post you speculated that Wagner and Trenberth were «linked,» well - prior to the publication of the article, and now you're suggesting that Wagner would not be aware of the potential for controversy surrounding a paper by Spencer?

You'll recall that the paper in Annals of Applied Statistics by McShane and Wyner had critiques by 9 teams of colleagues as well as a rejoinder, that paper was put on line well in advance of publication, and the authors referred to the online critiques as well as published critiques in their printed rejoinder and supporting online material (the published version alone amounted to 110 pp.)

Carbon Tracker has contributed the carbon budget analysis and the paper cites previous studies on unneeded carbon from «Danger Zone» as well as our recent publication on renewable energy costs «The End of the Load for Coal and Gas».

It should not be the case that these prevent publication of an overall very good and original paper with potentially a high impact.

Publication today is essentially regarded as the publication of a peer reviewed paper, however, it is always best to consult a journal's speciPublication today is essentially regarded as the publication of a peer reviewed paper, however, it is always best to consult a journal's specipublication of a peer reviewed paper, however, it is always best to consult a journal's specific policy.

Besides, in good journals being a member of the Editorial Board does not facilitate publication of your paper.

We noted the systematic dismissal of editors who publish peer - reviewed papers questioning climate alarm, as well as the legitimate fears of untenured faculty whose promotions depend on publications and grant support.

Later research into the peer - review process that allowed the publication of their paper uncovered that Energy and Environment editor - in - chief Sonja Boehmer - Christiansen had rushed the paper into publication for «policy impact reasons, e.g. publication well before COP9.»

It is well known that there have been some glitches in the peer review: a paper by Soon and Baliunas (2003) caused the resignation of several editors from the journal Climate Research (Kinne 2003), and Wagner (Wagner et al. 2011) resigned from the editorship of Remote Sensing over the publication of a paper by Spencer and Braswell (2010).

He's gone to Japan, Sweden, Brazil and beyond writing about cars for MSN Autos, and has contributed to Dwell, GOOD, and other publications made out of paper.

irrigation was a big part of the paper a colleague and I have pending publication called «Burning Water - The Energy Return on Water Invested» - using irrigated water numbers, the best biofuels required 10 times the water input as the most water intensive fossil fuel.

And because researchers aren't paid to do peer review, they tend to put it right at the bottom of their task lists, meaning publication takes forever, but peer review is still sloppy and often may amount to little more than an expert scan reading a paper, checking pretty cursorily whether it's well presented and looks good and new.

* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office * Differences will be on the edge of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective interpretation * Several attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work of BEST, and to prevent them from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups of people will try to cloud the issue to the point of leaving the public unsure about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly - warming world, the only other certitude being that all mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to human mind.