Sentences with phrase «of the best strikers of»

He was one of our best strikers of all time.

Undoubtedly one of the best strikers of the last two decades — except during his time in the Premier League.

when u have one of the best strikers of the moment for 50 million euros plus your striker that does nt even make the tally of 20 goals a season in the league, you take it

Despite his position Ramsey is one of our best strikers of the ball alongside Sanchez, Walcott, Campbell, Podolski (and then), Welbeck, Giroud right down the perking order to Per.

If the 31 - year - old completes a deal with the Turkish club, then one of the best strikers of the Premier League era will be departing from the division and is likely to never return in a playing capacity.

Not exact matches

The French striker has been limited to the bench so far this term, but has severely impressed when being brought on, although I'm sure there are still plenty of Gunners who would like to see Olivier replaced or bettered in the coming windows.

thus, harry kane is a differentiator vs our feature striker of the week, their defensevis also better in minimizing goals,

Come to think of it, if not having a proven striker and very rich bench has been hindering the club from clinching major trophies all these years, sincerely, it baffles me why the club is bent on not trying to risk getting good and enough players, if not for anything, for the sake of seeing what would result from taking such step.

«But you want the best players to play in the new stadium and he's one of the best strikers in the world at the moment.

One good striker up front and they would have made goulash out of us.

Yes Giroud is not a 30 goal a season striker, but he does have his place, when we are struggling to get the ball out of our own half as a target man, and in set pieces, and defence, and he does score the odd goal from free play as well.

With Wayne Rooney showing his credentials for playing as a striker in the 2 - 0 win over Sunderland this weekend, here's a suggestion for Louis van Gaal as he looks to pick his best Manchester United team for the rest of the season...

Predominately used as a striker, he is taking good advantage of his development by adapting his game into wide positions thanks to his pace and outrageous skill.

In terms of Theo and Giroud several teams have better strikers 1.

He had problems to adapt to Wenger mediocre gameplay and little ambition... He showed his best during the first half of the season as Central Striker untill guess who changed him back to the wing... yes «Marvellous knows it all» Arsene Weneger.

the problem isnt even giroud the problem we have is that we miss an atleast equally good striker, lets be honest we all know that giroud is a striker who has patches when he has his scoring patch he scores almost at a rate of one goal / assist per game and is in a worldclass form, the prob is if his annual dry patch comes we need an equally good striker

I thought he was goin 2core 3mo until he (makeshift striker) was taken off n the first choice came on 2successfully complete his 8games with out a score by the way walcot had a good number of shorts on target as well MOTM.

Giroud misses more than he hits, Walcott has NEVER delivered his expected talent, Welbeck will NEVER be the striker to score 20 goals a season Coqellin will NOT go a whole season injury or suspension free, Sanchez and Ozil WILL have down period during the season, all teams have these problems to a greater or lesser degree but most of the top teams will address these problems and players either inprove or are sold and replaced with better or at least more consistant players, NOT Wenger he keeps doing the same thing over and over with the same players and he expects a different result but gets the same outvome time and time again, yet its ALWAYS someone else's fault be it the Ref or the linesman or the opposition or bad luck or whatever and whoever and its NEVER the fact that HE has done nothing to change the situation and LOOKS LIKELY to not change it next time around.

Back then, were the prices of these aforementioned top strikers not less than # 50 before you opted for the world best strikers Lord Benthner, Edwardo da Silva, Adebayo, Giroud, Welbeck?

I kind of wish we had Giroud in there as an experienced striker but nevertheless we are still looking good.

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

While there have been plenty of former Arsenal players, including the TV pundits Paul Merson and Thierry Henry, as well as every man and his dog with an opinion about Arsene Wenger and Arsenal, ready to jump on the bosses back and bemoan his failure or refusal to use the summer transfer window to sign another striker, there are a few that have come out in support of the under fire Frenchman.

I see Poldi's best position as a second striker, but unfortunately Arsenal doesn't play a 2 man forward lineup, hence there's no way we can bring the best out of him unless we drastically alter our style of play.

Its seems to me that both the club and it's fans are not serious.Anytime Arsenal sign a youngster from another team who is dubbed the next whatever people come out and say Arsenal have just signed a youngster who may or may not make it and that Arsene should sign ready made.They say it to seem as if it's a bad thing.Now that Chris Willock is leaving I'm anticipating that a lot of people are soon going to be blaming the same Wenger who actually likes bringing in youngsters.Anyway you have to look at the reasons he lfet.It's for game time and to him he thinks its a good choice.The bright side is that he's not Arsenal's most talented player.The likes of Donyell Malen, Yassin Fortune, Reiss Nelson in my eyes have more potential as wingers.I also think Arsenal should be very excited about Eddie Nketiah and Stephy Mavididi.They can be world class strikers in the future particularly Eddie.

Having said that, Henry doesn't striker me as a great coach or manager in the making and he is probably better of as a TV pundit.

Well there are lots of Arsenal transfer rumours suggesting that the World Cup winning striker is set to leave the Emirates before thew summer transfer window closes and the club most likely to take him was the Italian champions Juventus.

Now Hector Bellerin has given us all a glimpse of what Alexis gives to the club off the pitch as well, in comments reported by Metro, and from that it seems even more vital that we keep hold of our star striker.

Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble, score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming from Henry.He should rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!

Spurs will have a great chance of finishing ahead of us by getting Janssen Janssen is a decent striker and the duo of Janssen and Kane is better than the duo of Theo and Giroud IMO Spurs also have two Top CB with Vertonghen and Alderwireld.

I think Giroud is one of the games best plan B strikers honestly, he's a terrific alternative to have and would get into most teams in Europe for that specific function.

Several names have been passed around on social media, including classics of Benzema and Higuain, as well as Everton striker Romelu Lukaku.

im not to sure about sterling because im on the idea to take a striker first, like lacazette and play in the wing ox, welbeck, walcott, chuba or maybe campbell or wellington (probably i would sell the last one... al of u try him like a star when he is not younger than campbell and he did nt do anything, for me he is not on the standard)... BUT u cant said that walcott is the best winger in the league when he is fit.

Assuming we don't sign a striker and CB, The answer is NO Last season was our best chance because United, city, Chelsea were in arying levels of disaray Reasons why we didn't win: 1.

In a way I hope the young striker does get another chance to play against West Brom because we have seen signs of some real talent and the more he plays the more comfortable he will feel in the side and the better he should perform.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

However if Iheanacho turns out to be amongst some of the best strikers in the not too far distance future, then I'm sure his name will be added to the list of players that Arsene Wenger almost signed.

When fully fit, Carroll is one of the best strikers in the Premier League.

Falcao emerged as one of the best strikers in the world at Porto, before securing a big - money move to Spanish giants Atletico Madrid.

Walcott just backtrack from his wish of playing as central striker Confidence is one the most important trait for a good striker.

I reckon at least one of the young strikers will come good for us, so long as Arsene doesn't turn the lot of them into wingers.

So i think Walcott is a fantastic winger (when he is fit) but he will not be a good number 9, As a striker he becomes a one trick pony, running of the shoulder of the defender drifting into the spaces looking from the through ball from ozil or carzola etc..

Let's go all out and sign some good striker for the memory of great striker, ohh no, just forget about it

Higuain has been so good for Napoli in recent years that he is now in front of Sergio Aguero, who only started one of five games at the Copa America, in the Argentina pecking order and the Man City striker is widely regarded as one of, if not the very, best forwards in the Premier League.

We need to be looking at signing a top striker, with each of our rivals having better options, and we have to sign someone who can danger the 20 - goal mark every year.

Giroud, since he first kicked a ball for us, has followed up great patches of goal scoring with being a complete lamppost, Walcott, Ox, are the definition of overrated, Ramsey is horrendous, Cazorla is always injured now, Ozil plays well when he feels like it, Gabriel is not Arsenal quality, we have no true top striker STILL since RVP left.

He's better as a striker but that was the role of sturridge.

Wenger has no tactics, plays his favourite players over better players, gives long term contracts to average and injury prone players, hates strong physical players, plays players out of position, always looking for excuse like refrees and saying other teams played more in pre season, does nt spend money on players required like if we need strikers he will buy CAM, waits for other teams to buy top players and signs average on deadline day, calls accident when we lose, talks cohesion and mental strength when we beat terrible teams and win mickey mouse trophy like Asia cup and community shield.

Note that today, he played alongside a world class striker (Lewandowski) who couldn't even do anything of note as well

few weeks back there was an article on here about injured players coming back and helping at the tail end of the season; the article was big on Wilshire and I commented saying Welbeck will be the one I will most look out or because he offers us something different upfront, either as a striker or on the wings, I also said Wilshire does not register on my radar not because he os not good but simply because we have better players in his role and he has not been missed one jot....

it's been 10 years for the fast 140k a week striker / winger and still waiting for him to come good, in the expense of titles