«An accused person can seek to have the results
of the breath tests excluded,» Garson adds.
Not exact matches
The results
of the
breath tests were therefore
excluded.
Lastly, in my discussions with the Crown through previous correspondence and during the meeting in chambers with the Judge, I emphasized that I would seek to
exclude the
breath readings due to the improper administration
of the roadside
breath test which took place without any inquiry as to the time
of the accused's last drink.
I find that to admit the statement and the
breath tests would bring the administration
of justice into disrepute and it will be
excluded.
For example, can you get
breath samples in an over 80 case
excluded under s. 24 (2) or even s. 24 (1)
of the Charter because your client was held unreasonably long at the police station after providing the required
breath tests.
R. v. Manchulenko (M.) 2013 ONCA 543 Civil Rights — Right to counsel — General — Denial
of — Evidence taken inadmissible The accused was acquitted on alcohol related driving charges after the trial judge
excluded the evidence from the two
breath tests (Charter, s. 24 (2)-RRB-, because
of a breach
of the accused's right to counsel (Charter, s. 10 (b)-RRB-, prior to the first
test.