Sentences with phrase «of the chemical reaction of»

* Just to note: because of the chemical reaction of sunflower seeds to baking soda, the bread will turn green once cooked.

For instance, ozone depletion in the atmosphere occurs because of chemical reactions of hydrochloric acid on the surface of ice crystals and aerosols in the upper atmosphere.

Ketones are the biproducts of the chemical reaction of ketosis, where the body burns fat to gain energy for the brain and body.

This means, in the worst case the airbag could explode without an electric ignition, because of the chemical reaction of the water and the propellant.

Not exact matches

That's because the chemicals in these products can trigger a reaction dubbed multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), a chronic condition that causes nausea and headaches when sufferers are exposed to even low levels of certain chemicals.

Recent Projects: research on how to design an incinerator to avoid chemical reactions (two and a half hours, $ 100); history of a bill on child custody; helping a small company build a corporate library.

Similar to how every chemical reaction has an activation energy, we can think of every habit or behavior as having an activation energy as well.

The former safety team member who asked to remain anonymous said Tesla told workers that their reactions to workplace chemicals were personal medical problems instead of treating them.

Yet, we also have current strong demand, falling OPEC productions and a possibility of a major reaction by the United States after Syria allegedly crossed the chemical weapons line in the sand.

The gasification process takes organic, carbonaceous materials and transforms them into efficient synthetic gas through a series of chemical reactions held at high temperatures.

The head of Pool Re, the government - backed terrorism reinsurance pool, has called for a debate on the insurance industry's reaction to chemical,...

As with politics, those that are entrenched in the belief in a God will not be persuaded by any scientific findings; they can always say that God was behind the creation of those physical laws or principles, chemical reactions, etc..

And if no God then your disapproval is merely your DNA doing it's job, a series of chemicals, nothing worth talking about, no different then what happens in the most disturbed minds on the planet... it's all the same... just natural reactions.

After all life when broken down is nothing but a series of chemical reactions and mathematical equations.

sam stone Given we are made in the image of God our core «DNA» (as evidenced by 98 % of the world population) knows there is more to this existence than chemical reaction on organic matter.

You can't accept that atoms, molecules, chemical reactions in our bodies, and the rest of the universe just work somehow, but you can accept that a mystical all - knowing being simply created it all?

I grew up «in the church»; walked away during my «brilliant college years»; came back as the result of becoming a chemical engineer and witnessing the total predictability of chemical reactions.

This means that you do not hold to atheism because it is true, but rather because of a series of chemical reactions.

The simple fact is that if matter can neither be created or destroyed in a normal chemical reaction than how does the «god» come up with something out of nothing... remember matter CAN NOT be CREATED or DESTROYED, so if this god follows the normal physics and chemistry than it could not have created the universe either... it just exists b / c it exists..

You just happen to be addicted to that one type of chemical reaction.

Additionally, as a rumor, I hear all the fish in the lake were killed as well due to the chemical reaction of the material in the Jesus.

You are only stimulating part of your brain that gives you a chemical reaction that you have named a God, but it's just that a chemical reaction in your brain.

They are nothing more than units of chemical reactions and a steel cross will not impact the rate or quality of such chemical reactions in any way.

Our cells break down the sugars, and the electrons flow through them in a complex set of chemical reactions until they are passed on to electron - hungry oxygen.

I'm not just the product of chemical reactions to stimulus, but the product of a greater intelligence that supersedes what some hostile guy on the internet simply imagines.

I'm not just the product of chemical reactions to stimulus»

He would argue that Leclerc's notion of «physical existence» applies not only to our more typical notion of a molecule of water, or of sugar, or of hemoglobin (all of similar type), but also to examples of crystals, which are markedly different, and to systems of chemical reaction which persist far from equilibrium.

Likewise, the ratio of electrons to protons can not vary by more than 1 part in 10 to the 37th power or else electromagnetic interactions would prevent chemical reactions.

The most extensive application of quantum chemistry can tell us little or nothing about the shape of a molecule, unless it is considered within the context of a particular reaction or particular chemical environment.

When you understand the vast number of possible chemical reactions per liter per second and the truly large number of attempts (coin flips) that really entails — you will find that the «Law of Averages» and statistics are not on your side.

Likewise, the ratio of electrons to protons can not vary by more than 1 part in 1037 or else electromagnetic interactions would prevent chemical reactions.

Chemical reactions are the result, not the cause of free thought.

There is nothing connecting photons to neurons other than the sensory input of sight and the infrared glow of chemical reactions in all living matter.

Organic chemistry, or «the study of carbon based compounds», explains how life is simply a seires of chemical reactions.

It is POSSIBLE that these things are only figments of my imagination or are emotions being charged simply by chemical reactions in my body.

Similarly — and our common sense, modern philosophy, and the vast bulk of scientists are in agreement on this — while life and non-life both involve chemical reactions, life is qualitatively different in some very important ways.

This problem runs deep, undercutting even the basis of rationality itself.4 In the atheist's naturalistic worldview, thoughts and reasoning are just the results of chemical reactions in the brain.

And don't say they are merely chemical reactions that we can observe, because if I put those chemicals into a bowl, I can't say that the bowl is now aware of me and loves me... Nope, there is no objective proofs of the existence of those outside of observing their effects... They're invisible, and yet they exist.

All of these scientific hypotheses boil down to first there was an planetary mass covered with water and providing the correct conditions for chemical reactions to create a simple organic compound from which life was formed.

Manfred Eigen's approach11 envisions self - reproducing cycles of catalytic and autocatalytic chemical reactions (hypercycles) that undergo modifications that lead to other more complicated self - reproducing networks of interaction (larger hypercycles).

Kauffman argues that, given a sufficiently complex network of reactions, eventually a self replicating cycle of chemical reactions must necessarily arise.

A homely example12 may clarify how networks (say, of chemical reactions) would be expected to become simpler with the passage of time, as unnecessary steps drop out.

Any aqueous solution that contains a large number of chemicals must necessarily give rise to an even more complicated set of chemical reactions between and among those molecules, producing yet more chemical types.

There are myriad chemical reactions that need to be precisely staged to form DNA, the building block of life.

(He assumed that this molecule had the opportunity to develop by natural chemical reactions on 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 (1020) «hospitable» planets over a period of four billion years.

a chemical reaction is a byproduct of love.

In real chemical systems, the B - Z reaction for instance, quite similar bifurcation of spatial solutions occurs.

Concentrations of X and Y do not smoothly approach their equilibrium values (as do concentrations of all chemicals involved in ordinary reactions) but rather these concentrations oscillate around the condition of equilibrium.

This woman seems to think that this phenomena of chemical reactions in the brain when love and se - xual desire occur is God.

The diffusion of chemical species through the reaction medium requires time.