Sentences with phrase «of the data points does»

Always, «the result was still significant,» he says, suggesting the big picture holds even if some of the data points do not.

Not exact matches

«Companies like Rubikloud are trying to figure out, now that we have all of these devices and objects connected to the Internet, what does this mean in terms of the data points that are being collected, and what can we bring to a shopper's experience to help optimize it,» explains McGill.
Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute, pointed out that personal medical data goes for five times the amount that financial or other data does on the dark web.
Topol pointed out that currently there's a ton of «information blocking» going on by health providers that don't» want to share data with others for fear of losing their patients (i.e. business).
So while we feel we've lost control of the way our personal data is collected, that doesn't mean we'll stop sharing it on Facebook... or Twitter, or Pinterest, or Instagram (you get the point).
Carly Fiorina, the former CEO of HP, shared that the point is to «turn data into information, information into knowledge and insight, and knowledge into competitive advantage, and to do it in a matter of minutes or seconds, not days or weeks.»
As a marketer, I can't really do anything with a data point about the percentage of business travelers who are women — at least not anything that will differentiate from all of the rest of my competitors.
The note then runs through a bunch of things ranging from pricing power (the incumbents could, and in some cases already do, provide tiered access at different price points), size (they could buy up disruptive rivals) and access to data (some markets are easier to break in to than others).
But if and when it does, as seems likely at this point, the likes of Facebook and Google may find themselves facing more complaints by Europeans angered at the treatment of their data.
But with so much data for a campaign to sift through, «you can't go through 30,000 points of data and go: «Did you acquire this piece of data on this voter ethically?»»
Although the Council's stance on this element of the incoming data protection regulation won't become official until member states agree on the whole thing — an event that will trigger negotiations with the European Parliament — it does represent a major step forward, as the nature of the one - stop - shop mechanism has been the major sticking point in reaching overall agreement.
But my specific point is that while everybody is busy telling you that «kids don't use email» or «email is dead» I have actual data from portfolio company's CEO showing the efficacy of email as a communication and marketing channel.
And while Kogan maintained he had never drawn a salary from the work he did for SCL — saying his reward was «to keep the data», and get to use it for academic research — he confirmed SCL did pay GSR # 230,000 at one point during the project; a portion of which he also said eventually went to pay lawyers he engaged «in the wake» of Facebook becoming aware that data had been passed to SCL / CA by Kogan — when it contacted him to ask him to delete the data (and presumably also to get him to sign the NDA).
You could easily spend months doing an in - depth statistical analysis of thousands of data points; but that might actually hamstring your efforts.
This is at least a point higher than the average for employees who do their jobs in regular offices, and something so unheard of that we had to look at the data again.
So when analysts point out that a lot of consumption is paid for by businesses on behalf of employees, and so does not show up as consumption in the data, they are right.
One data point does not make a trend, but also take note of the fact that employment growth for June in the U.S. would bring the rolling average of job creation, as measured by the last few months, to less than 150,000.
I based my growth expectations on what I think were conservative estimates of consumption growth and the growth in productive investment (with which the reported data is currently consistent, although do not prove my assumptions one way or the other), but I always pointed out that as long as credit growth accelerated, the growth in non-productive investment would remain high, in which case reported GDP would also remain high for much longer.
The explanation did little, however, to stem the tide of anger as independent researchers pointed out that many others could have similarly misused Facebook data.
Forget the specifics, for a paragraph, because this is a notable development: while these hearings usually devolve into partisan cliches with the same talking points — Democrats want regulations, and Republicans don't — yesterday Senators from both sides of the aisle expressed unease with Facebook's handling of private data; obviously Democrats tried to tie the issue to the last election, but that made the Republicans» shared concern all - the - more striking.
The point, they say, is to provide the data and to make people aware of it, so that managers can understand what works and, just as important, what doesn't.
Of course, there is little point in obtaining large streams of data just for the sake of it, especially if it does not provide any meaningful insighOf course, there is little point in obtaining large streams of data just for the sake of it, especially if it does not provide any meaningful insighof data just for the sake of it, especially if it does not provide any meaningful insighof it, especially if it does not provide any meaningful insight.
Expect Zuckerberg to point to all of the announcements the company has already made since the Cambridge Analytica story came to light — things like rewriting its terms of service and cutting ties with outside data providers it doesn't know if it can trust.
These are the most updated historical estimates and data available regarding the Blue Spec and Gold Spec deposits (except for the data contained in this news release and Novo's news release of January 21, 2016) and, as such, no work needs to be done at this point in time to upgrade or verify the historical estimates.
The rental and utility payment data included in Vantage is limited and, to the earlier point on FICO, really does not tell you about the obligor's ability to pay a 30 - year mortgage and take care of the house.
We do recognize that some of the underlying data may point toward a weaker unemployment picture than appears on the surface.
They didn't know important data points and hadn't identified the cause of the problem they wanted to address.
Rule 1: You Can't Make Them Up Rule 2: Don't Confuse a Buyer Persona with a Customer Profile Rule 3: Get the Right People with the Right Attributes and the Right Skills Involved Rule 4: Buyer Personas Are a Translation of Goals Rule 5: A Buyer Persona Offers Insight into the Unarticulated and the No - So - Obvious Rule 6: Buyer Persona Development is Not a Quantitative Process Rule 7: Avoid Building a Wire Mesh of Data Points When Developing Buyer Personas Rule 8: Goal - Centered Qualitative and Experiential Analysis is the Foundation of Buyer Persona Development Rule 9: The Purpose of the Buyer Persona Development Process is to Inform on Goal - Centered Customer Strategies Rule 10: Buyer Persona Development Serves as a Communications Platform to Tell the Story of Customers and Buyers
Interesting data points: Absentee buyers, typically investors who don't intend on living in the home as a primary residence, made up 22.3 percent of all homes sold in March, up from 20.9 percent at the same time last year.
This points out that everything that you explained as being only aplicable to god, which is an explanation given because no other explanation is seen, saying this is amazing so god did it, is nowhere near close to looking at these phenomena, observing and collecting the data on it and saying this is our best understanding of it to date.
It does work much better when you point to actual sources when you post data — at least for those of us who prefer to comment on facts more than opinion.
ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.
This can be done from many points of view, but I have suggested above that the crucial attack is that which accepts the same data and then shows that the argument does not exclude the presence of contingent elements in God's total nature.
My point is that the author is cherry - picking data from cosmology and Genesis in order to support his claim but does not discuss all of the disagreements between Genesis and cosmology.
My second point is that I do not see how one who adheres to the doctrine of regional inclusion can avoid affirming that one prehension has two subjects and this implication of the doctrine constitutes a reduction ad absurdum.8 That if established, it would be a reductio is clear from passages such as the following: «A feeling is in all respects determinate, with a determinate subject, determinate initial data...»; no feeling can be abstracted either from its data, or its subject» (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 338 and 355).
The Gestalt of twentieth - century theology that I will offer does not exist objectively there in the data or, more accurately from my point of view, it is one of many Gestalts that can be truly discerned there.
People still bear a burden of contempt from leaders and systems that reduce them to jobs to be done, votes to be cast, products to be bought or — let us be honest enough to add — data points on a rising line of worship attendance.
Whitehead's point in both passages (PR 253 and PR 241) is that Descartes, Locke, and Hume, etc., having adopted the subjectivist bias, inconsistently do what they should not do; namely, continue to interpret the datum in the act of experience using the substance - quality categories.
Concretely, he must never be satisfied to cease asking â $ ˜but why?â $ ™ until he has driven his understanding to the point where he has an immediate, human grasp of what a given position meant, such that every nuance in the data is accounted for and withal, given the total of presuppositions and circumstances, he could feel himself doing the sameâ $ (p. 290).
For at this point in a fundamental ontological datum we must not deviate into mere empirical fact and think that we could attribute to the knowing subject some impetus that would mean the term of transcendence was merely there as a goal confronting the movement indifferently and extrinsically and having in itself nothing to do with the movement.
=============== Summary: Other than your comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1 above), the remainder of your comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.
You said, «Summary: Other than your comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1 above), the remainder of your comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.»
To do so, it needed better technology and data, so the company is investing in a new point of sale (POS) system, ECRS, for its supermarket and liquor stores.
In all studies, analyses with glucose AUCi, insulin AUCi, measured meal GI and GL, and II values, with the exclusion of a possible outlier (which was defined as any data point beyond 2 SDs from the mean value), did not alter results, and therefore, the data for all subjects who completed all interventions are reported.
Secondly, if you are trying to prove the average points and standard deviation of that data for Alex Smith's offense in 2016, then maybe don't include the Nick Foles games in your data.
It doesn't, but if you tried to compile data about those elements of his game you'd be making my points for me.
It's horrible that they were accused of something so serious that they didn't do, but that kind of «data» is purely apocryphal: all the evidence and studies points to women getting ignored and having their cases tossed far more than the reverse.
Although the number of previous game matches and overall units won wanes at each data point, we do see our systems return on investment increase as we focus on higher scoring offensive teams.
All any of us can do is take the existing data we have (in the case of Grayson Allen, 4 years of College, with over 700 3 - point attempts) and make generalized statements like «he's a good shooter», and compare his stats with other college players that went before him (like Delly).
Last season when we analyzed Coors overs we did not include closing totals of 11, however, when we went back to the drawing board this season we noticed that it had always been a profitable data point.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z