Sentences with phrase «of the discussions of»

Actually, the topic of this article derived from a conversation my girlfriend and I were having, when the topic of discussion all of a sudden coincidentally ended up in her Instagram newsfeed minutes later.

Much of the discussion of nostalgia, however, misunderstands why it works.

In it, space nerds of all stripes will find a ton of engineering to marvel at, including a 35 - story space vehicle (and even the prospect the intercontinental rockets that could get you from London to New York in under a half an hour), as well as plenty of discussion of the many technical challenges to realize this dream.

There's been lots of discussion of excessively high burn rates recently.

The API store was highlighted by JPMorgan chief Jamie Dimon in his annual letter to shareholders as part of a discussion of the bank's tech strategy.

Musk said that he specifically requested inclusion of discussion of the travel ban at the closed meeting, as the issue had not been included on the agenda originally.

Now that investors have been reminded of the structural weaknesses of a common currency - even outside of the discussion of high debt loads - persistently high spreads may be here to stay.

There is quite a bit of discussion of his methods now as you say.

It made me wonder if we are trying so hard to be different, to be unique, that we've placed ourselves firmly in the center of all discussions of church and worship.

There's also a bit of discussion of Berry's novella Remembering, which I read this Spring with the book - club and highly recommend — starts a bit slow, but develops into a truly — oh, what the heck — memorable reading experience.

In other words, between two of the most prominent ex-gay books of the 1990s, you got about a couple of blog posts worth of discussion of celibacy, almost none of it directed to practical problems celibates face.

And, now that I've said that, I will point out that this has absolutely nothing to do with the abortion question, and is merely a de-railment of the discussion of a woman's right to decide what takes place in her body.

The modern shift of the discussion of God from cosmology to metaphysics, mystical experience, morality, and supra - rational grounds itself reflects developments in scientific cosmology.

Most of the 350 - plus books written by «creation scientists» consist in large part of discussions of the supposed errors of evolutionary teaching, reviewing vast amounts of technical scientific data and theory, challenging this or that piece of evidence, method of dating or use of data, while producing evidences and counterarguments of their own in favor of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..

Instead, the sentence in question was part of a discussion of Augustine's view of just war and its subsequent implications during the medieval crusading movement.

One finds the antecedents of this tradition in early stages of discussion of Darwinian evolution.

It is no surprise, then, that at the beginning of this discussion of Israel's purpose and privilege within the plan of God, Paul mentions the fact of Israel adoption by God (Rom 9:4).

It is not clear whether Metz would agree to this particular extension of his discussion of memory.

Through the nineteenth century, most of the discussion of economic issues had this wider context.

Much of the discussion of the first directive has concentrated on the issue of non-violence, but it also says that «the lives of animals and plants... deserve protection, preservation and care».18 The church's record on this issue has been subject to criticism, and certainly modern European society has tended to exploit the natural world and to emphasize the gap between human and other forms of life.

Executive avarice and corporate greed, still high in national consciousness, will be part of any discussion of «How much would Jesus accumulate?»

Some of this I have done in the concluding part of the discussion of «person,» but only in formal ways.

Ben Sira embeds one of his discussions of almsgiving (29:8 — 13) between a section on making loans (29:1 — 7) and a section on offering surety for a friend's loan (29:14 — 28).

At the very outset of any discussion of Jesus some important limitations to our knowledge must be frankly recognized.

That [B] preceded [C] in the original version is plausible considering the continuity that exists in the dynamics of the discussion of the whole made by the juxtaposition of the now two separated passages.

In what he admits is «more tentative and exploratory than any other part of my discussion of metaphysics and education» (WPP 86), Brumbaugh attempts to convey some of the elements in this new vision of the aesthetically interesting.

It is the communication of the Gospel that should be at the centre of the discussion of proselytism.

What I find facinating about all this is the lack of discussion of Romney's religion, Mormonism.

After a long evening of discussion of Santayana's recent verse play, Lucifer: A Theological Tragedy, the young poet was asked to read a sonnet of his own.

This is a scholarly work and much of the discussion of texts and sources will be chiefly of interest to specialists, but the general reader can also benefit greatly from this careful reading of a personality and period decisive for the subsequent Christian story.

Learning something of the history of the discussion of our topic widens and clarifies our issues.

The passage is set in the context of a discussion of structured societies and the two types of component groups that may be included in them, «subordinate nexus» and «subordinate societies.»

«Divine inspiration» means «produced by God», and this means, in terms of our discussion of God in Chapter VIII, «arising from those aspects of the nature of things which are experienced in the five fundamentals of change, dependence, etc.» Thus divine inspiration can be intelligibly interpreted to mean that the Scriptures are very particularly transparent to and vehicles of the basic experiences called religious.

That question has surrounded much of the discussion of postliberalism.

There is some overlapping of the discussion of finality in Chapter Twelve of this book with the content of the first section of that lecture.

Its amazing that we celebrate the public displays of faith by a young multi-millionaire who has done nothing else except to contravene Christian teachings and made himself the focus of a discussion of faith rather than God, and ignore the work being done by others who have walked away from the limelight.

It is truly revealing in that in the whole history of discussion of the nature of God, nowhere is the prefix «omni» applied to love!

This concept was considered in previous posts as part of the discussion of the flood.

In light of this discussion of presuppositional analysis, it is perhaps worth making one final point concerning the relation between such a second - order type of procedure and the foregoing discussion of the first - order procedure of presenting the data of experience as evidence.

Cummings leads us through the history of discussion of this and allied areas, taking in some entertaining if horrifying views requiring censure: proof, if proof were needed, that laxism did not begin with our current age.

Much of the discussion of community today is marked by a degree of imprecision that borders on obscurity.

The relevance of this discussion of the self in the context of the problem of faith and reason stems from the basic religious intuition that reason is not free to know God because of its corruption by sin and that the seat of sin is somehow in the self.

Regrettably, much of our discussion of man and woman is not especially illuminating, because, being political and disputatious, it seeks victory rather than understanding.

But this is not the end of our discussion of Jonah.

As I pointed out earlier, there is an «existential» undertone in all of our discussions of chance.

Do you really mean too Calvinistic or just not as broad of a discussion of the cross as you'd prefer?

It seems that after many, many rounds of discussion of the topic, you don't even have the ABCs of evolution down.

10 I am indebted to David R. Griffin, God, Power and Evil: A Process Theodicy (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1976), pp. 275 - 310, for much of my discussion of evil.

Miola's critique of my discussion of John Shakespeare's «spiritual testament» is awash with rhetorical sophistry designed to undermine its objective importance.

In a profound survey of the history of the discussion of love in biblical, classical, and Christian sources he concluded agape was the central Christian idea.