In a 2009 Institute study of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter
of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants.
In a release issued yesterday the institute said results from 2009 testing showed that small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter
of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants in vehicles that otherwise had good rating for frontal crash protection.
In a 2009 IIHS study of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter
of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants.
Not exact matches
An analysis
of 14 years worth
of crash data
involving Institute - rated vehicles shows that a driver
of a vehicle rated good in the moderate overlap test is 46 percent less likely to die in a
frontal crash, compared with a driver
of a vehicle rated poor.
A new Institute
crash test evaluates how well vehicles protect people in
frontal crashes involving 25 percent
of a vehicle's front end.
The number
of drivers
of 0 -3-year-old passenger vehicles
involved in fatal
frontal crashes has fallen 55 percent since 2001.
Because only 40 percent
of the front end is
involved, this test places a far greater stress on the structure
of the vehicle than the federal
frontal crash test.
Now, the IIHS has begun testing cars in a 40 mile per hour head - on
crash test that
involves only the left 25 percent
of the
frontal structure hitting a rigid barrier.
ARLINGTON, Va. — Drivers
of vehicles with good small overlap front ratings from the Insurance Institute from Highway Safety can expect to be protected well in a
frontal crash involving the left corner
of the vehicle.