And the other great moral and political questions
of the great debate on salt and iron — the need for profits, the rights and obligations of nobility, aid to the poor, the importance of a balanced budget, the appropriate tax burden, the risk of anarchy, and the dividing line between rule of law and tyranny — have all remained unresolved issues.
Not exact matches
Sure, at
debates, like last night's
great one in Milwaukee, candidates are always asked questions that begin with, «As president, will you...» but we all know that presidents alone can't really do anything but put their socks
on or, in more recent years, play a lot
of golf.
On Oct. 3, at a university in Denver, a man famous for his luxurious hair and wooden personality destroyed one of the great orators of our time in a one - on - one debat
On Oct. 3, at a university in Denver, a man famous for his luxurious hair and wooden personality destroyed one
of the
great orators
of our time in a one -
on - one debat
on - one
debate.
So while the heart
of this argument and
debate revolves around big money properties (team owners and wealthy players), the effect
on the nation's economy would be considerably
greater and have a massive effect
on small business.
I'm not in, or an apologist for, the industry; I'm just interested in a reasonable scientific
debate on an activity that seems to have the potential to add a
great deal
of value (including in disadvantaged indigenous communities if the resources are
on Native Title lands) and enhance Australian energy security.
The
great debate — both from consumer and employee perspectives —
of the past five years has been hyper - focused
on Millennials.
Michael Dell, chief executive officer
of his self - named computer company, knows
on whose side he stands amid the
great encryption
debate — the question
of whether tech companies should supply certain governments with access to their users» encrypted communications.
«The U.S. places
great importance
on free speech and the value
of open public
debate,» Hamilton said.
At a time
of great debate over employee pay, corporate responsibility and the impact
of workplaces
on corporate growth, it was
great to see that so many companies, varied in size, industry and lifespan, believed not only in their products and services, but also in their culture.
In response to some recent PEF commentary (now in the mainstream media thanks to today's Globe article)
on corporations in Canada hoarding cash (after - tax profits
greater than new investment), PEF member Eric Pineault weighs in with some more detailed analysis: The
great corporate cash stash Eric Pineault As we
debate the merits and uses
of -LSB-...]
The two keynote addresses
on the theme, which set up the major
debates of the Assembly, were in
great contrast.
Would the
great debate go
on because
of NO religious beliefs?
We need to build appealing subcultures rather than advance our own version
of the
Great Society or spend all
of our energy
on roiling national
debates that stand far apart from the everyday experience
of those Americans who could most benefit from what we have to offer.
I don't want to get too lost in the technical weeds
on this text, which would be easy to do, since there is a
great debate among top Greek scholars about how to understand the «time»
of present participles in Greek.
I have been asked many times during
debates about warfare whether I would use violence to defend myself and could never answer with any certainty that I would, but I knew without a shadow
of a doubt that if he made any attempt to harm my son he would find himself
on the receiving end
of the
Greater Clawed Maltese Falcon.
«Like the disciples, we should not be proud, seek an ascendant position or argue about who's the
greatest among us,» he notes in reflecting
on a passage from the Gospel
of Mark in which Jesus» followers are
debating who among them is the
greatest.
But because
of the relationship between permissible expression in national discourse, and in the subnational discourse that takes place among blacks, a broadening
of debate in the black community may encourage white politicians and intellectuals to speak, and think, with a
greater measure
of candor
on this issue.
Presidential
debates, increased public affairs, innovations in news coverage, fewer commercials
on children «s programs, more female and minority
on - air employment,
greater minority ownership
of stations, «free speech messages» in many cities,
greater responsiveness to viewer «s letters, and a temporary reduction in violent programs — all were brought about through the efforts
of the broadcast reform groups.9.
To describe the Church as a community
of memory and hope, sharing in the common memory not only
of Jesus Christ but also
of the mighty deeds
of God known by Israel, expecting the coming into full view
of the kingdom
on earth and / or in heaven; to describe it further as the community
of worship, united by its direction toward one God, who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit yet worshipped more as Father or as Son or as Holy Spirit in this or that part
of the community; to describe it as a community
of thought in which
debate and conflict can take place because there is a fundamental frame
of agreement and because there are common issues
of great import — to do all this and the much more that needs to be done would be to essay the work
of a large part
of theology.
Maybe, or maybe he too is caught up in a
great and as yet undecided civic
debate on the role and limits
of government in questions
of debt, taxes, public spending, entitlements, and tax codes.
I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult
of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the
greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He
debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages»
of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused
on internal holiness and not
on external holiness; — He violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord
of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept
of the Law into one
of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists
on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «evil» or «good».
Even in Middle - eastern culture, there are still many white people, so although it is unlikely for him to have appeared as a «white person», it's still not improbable, it does however contradict the cynic principles in Christianity, as they define him by what they believe would constitute their creator as being
great or perfect as a manifestation equal to his greatness, but this was the exact mistake the Jews made, and why they disregarded Jesus when he came in the Flesh, his appearance can be
debated on, but just like his birthday, or day
of death.
The churches at this point have a
great responsibility not to advocate over-all idealistic solutions but to emphasize the distinctively Christian message that is relevant to these issues, to help their members to see the world without the characteristic American ideological blinders, to challenge many
of the prevailing assumptions about the cold war and nuclear armaments, and to encourage the
debate on public questions about which most people prefer to be silent.
This would be a nice change but in my exprience
on these blogs a
great number
of the people seem far more interested in petty insults and jabs and any serious
debates.
There might be less opposition at the annual gathering
of the estimated 730 senior church figures when the landmark
debate on how to
greater accept gay marriage within the Kirk than expected.
I believe,
on the contrary, that it is a matter
of the
greatest importance to make clear the true implications
of the negation
of sexual difference and to
debate publicly what is at stake rather than falling back
on principles, such as equality, that flatter those who set themselves up as their standard bearers, even though the way these principles are invoked to justify the homosexual - marriage agenda does not stand up to critical scrutiny.
After acrimonious arguments about the judges and about the reporting
of the
debate; after a tedious procession to church, a new twelve - part Mass, and a long droned out and largely inaudible introduction by a local academic, the
debate finally got under way
on 27 July between Eck and Karlstadt in the
great hall
of the Pleissenburg Castle.
There is much
debate over the relative merits
of conventional farming, which has a large environmental impact
on the land it uses, and organic farming, which may require
greater land use for the same yield.
We can
debate on how
great the history is, compare ourselves to Chelsea, talk about how healthy our balance sheet his, how
great the fans are (under valued by the club), how Tottenham are «scums», etc etc... All those things do not really matter... Usually it will be to make ourselves feel better and mask the clear lake
of options and solutions in our own club.
Debate will rage
on over whether or not the penalty should have been given, but it's
great to see these two legends
of the game still able to embrace after the match regardless
of the controversy
on the pitch.
it was
Great hobby, to be making your beats, baselines and melodie and building your own tracks, So if your still
debating on getting yourself one
of those setups for making your own tracks?
First let me laugh hahahahaha.Secondly, let me give credit where it is due and say that that was a
great finish from Giroud.Thirdly, do you know that if Giroud did not score today he would have been criticized very badly you know why because he does a lot
of things wrongly when he does not score but when he scores everyone just ignores.How many people were actually focused
on him after he scored you would realize that he breaks up a lot
of attacks.Its a pity peeps are not being honest about him he is French and he is a very nice guy so i understand however.Lastly, it has been about 3 seasons or so that he has been here and people are still
debating over him.Make up your mind i made mine up from day one that he arrived and realized he was awful however
great classy goal.
I had no idea a blog post written tongue - in - cheek about whether women should marry attractive men or not would create such a furor — Jezebel thinks I'm blaming women for men's bad behavior (I'm not); Rush Limbaugh thinks I'm a militant feminist (wow, is he ever wrong, but I already knew that about him); the ladies
of «The View»
debated it; Shannon Devereaux Sanford interviewed me for her show, Shannon's Corner
on WTBQ in New Jersey; the podcast «The Bold and the Beautiful» talked about the column (they called me a «
great» columnist!)
Third, acknowledging that some
of the blame for the biased and one - sided media reporting
on head injuries rests with some members
of the scientific community who issue one - sided press releases and feed cherry - picked results about their findings to selected members
of the media, the authors look to a day when the «harsh division and polarization» in the research community (an almost inevitable byproduct, unfortunately,
of the intense competition for grant money in Concussion, Inc.), gives way to
greater collaboration among researchers and a more «cordial discourse» between scientists via letters and responses to journal editors and back - and - forth
debates at large academic conferences.
Eliminating chocolate milk in school cafeterias is a subject
of great debate, and one that I have yet to tackle
on this blog.
It goes without saying that the health and safety
of infants is
of great importance, but effective education and
debate does not need to involve specific names; it only invites personal attacks
on suffering people.)
There's usually a
great debate between veteran traveling families
on the topic
of toys.
On the other side
of the
debate, the American Academy
of Pediatrics states that the benefits for the infant in terms
of reduced risk
of infection, adult obesity, allergies, and asthma are so
great that breastfeeding must be viewed as an «investment in your child's future» rather than a «lifestyle choice.»
This is
great news — and also very important data to have
on hand as we head into the Child Nutrition Reauthorization this fall, when federal lawmakers will
debate whether to roll back some
of these same healthier school meal standards.
A book based
on editing and recycling previous volumes, James Owen's The Times
Great Letters A Century
of Notable Correspondence (Times Books) is a good standby for long Brexit
debates.
With access to the strategists and opinion - makers
on both sides
of the political divide, The Battle for Britain goes straight to the heart
of the
great debate, providing an incisive, authoritative and occasionally trenchant guide to the most dramatic constitutional question
of our times.
Hence, the
great question at stake within
debates on plurinationalism is whether it can reconcile particular rights based
on identity with strong state sovereignty and a discourse
of equality, while avoiding new exclusions and potential conflict associated with territorializing models
of ethnocultural difference.
Politics in Spires, together with OurKingdom, IPPR and the Department
of Politics at the University
of Southampton, are hosting the
Great Charter Convention — an open, public
debate on where arbitrary power lies in the UK today and how we should contest and contain it.
The CIOT also calls for a
debate on whether the House
of Lords should play a
greater role in scrutinising tax legislation as it goes through Parliament, without detracting from the powers
of the House
of Commons over tax matters.
Over the last few months, the public
debate in Italy has put
great emphasis
on the possible impacts
of TTIP
on agriculture and food.
And what
on earth would the public think, seeing 400
of us at some
great debate or occasion sitting there «twittering» rather than listening, thinking and speaking?
Also in this month's column: an introduction to the
great Democratic email fundraising
debate, more signs
of the new Republican emphasis
on field technolgy and an appreciation
of NGPVAN's innovative new grassroots app space.
At 6 p.m., City & State holds «The
Great Debate»
on the 2016 presidential race, with participants including Assemblyman Michael Blake
on behalf
of Clinton, NYC Councilman Eric Ulrich
on behalf
of John Kasich and former Sen. Tom Duane
on behalf
of Sanders, Federal Hall 15 Pine St., Manhattan.
But Harper's
greatest challenge starts next week when the House
of Lords reform bill begins its lengthy parliamentary journey with a two - day
debate in the Commons
on Monday and Tuesday.
But one
of the things that sustains you in this job is the sense that yes, our politics is full
of argument and
debate, and it can get quite heated, but no matter how difficult the decisions are, there's a
great sense
of British fair play, a quiet but prevailing sense that most people wish their Prime Minister well and want them to stick at it and get
on with the job.