Sentences with phrase «of the human mind as»

Peter experienced the Spirit of Christ, a nonperceptible reality proposing aims for guiding the actions of Peter directly analogous to the nonperceptible reality of the human mind as guiding the actions of the body.

He made absolute by a decree that has lasted to our own day the divorce between study of the world outside of us and study of the human mind as an instrument.

Another apt analogy is that of the human mind as an empty bucket about to be filled with the water of knowledge.

Not exact matches

The human mind relies primarily on visual stimuli to successfully interact with the world around it, which is why it's only natural for marketers to build the vast majority of their strategies around visual media platforms, relying on high definition video playback devices, such as smartphones and tablets, to broaden their reach and bring the message across.

That was true since automobiles transformed our lifestyles while simultaneously killing thousands a day, and it's true in our current reality of mind - bending technological progress with entrepreneurs aiming rockets at Mars and envisioning artificial intelligence that makes humans look about as smart a house cat in comparison.

Legendary physicist Feynman won the Nobel Prize for his work in one of the subjects that's the most difficult for the human mind to grasp — quantum mechanics — yet his top advice for accelerating learning is actually to make whatever you're studying as dead simple as possible.

The Secret Life of the Grown - Up Brain: The Surprising Talents of the Middle - Aged Mind (Viking) is a roundup of the most recent science on how the human brain ages, as well as a guide to «toning up your brain circuits» to better weather the onset of age — which is itself a relatively new problem for humankind, writes author Barbara Strauch, The New York Times «s deputy science and health and medical science editor, whose earlier book, The Primal Teen, considered the teenage brain.

And this is the miracle of the human mind — to use its constructions, concepts, and formulas as tools to explain what man sees, feels and touches.

Those who believe all combat sports are immoral, even those who choose to see mixed martial arts as «human cockfighting,» a degradation of Marquess of Queensberry orthodoxy, would have seen nothing to change their minds at the dome.

But the human mind is made to fall for stories and miscalculate the odds when a good narrative is in place, as has been usefully described by the work of Nassim Taleb and Daniel Kahneman, among others.

Is it so hard to just admit that we, as humans, with our feeble minds, can not possibly grasp the intricacy of the universe?

We as the human race should all be ashamed poisoned by are warped minds imperfect and all at fault in some way of form psychological, physically, and verbally.

Islam and or Muslims are not to be afraid off it is the Fear of the unknown that is the weakness of us humans is kept us in our shells until and unless we have an open heart and open mind we will never be able to find the Truth, The Truth that will give us Peace and make us love each other in solving the problems of this short temporary life, As a matter of fact all the Prophets brought in one and same message check the following link.

Hatred is what they certainly project, not love for the embryos, which is a piece of nonsense no one could experience, but hatred, a virulent hatred for an unnamed object... Their hatred is directed against human beings as such, against the mind, against reason, against ambition, against success, against love, against any value that brings happiness to human life.

We, as humans, can not fully comprehend the Glory of God, but we can the know mind of God as he revealed to us in His Word.

Both of these forms of Counter-Reformation Catholicism think of the moral life as primarily engaging the will, whereas Evangelical Catholicism understands the moral life to be a matter of training minds and hearts, the reason and the will, to make those choices that truly contribute to goodness, human flourishing, and the beatitude that enables the friends of Jesus to live forever within the light and love of the Most Holy Trinity.

The reality as we know it is that these are not divine messages, but nothing more than the delusions of the human mind.

As a Catholic in my late 20's, NOT a Bible pusher (none of my churches have ever promoted that), an open minded and respectful human - You all that are shouting for closure are just as bad as the Evangelicals / Extreme Christians that cram religion down throatAs a Catholic in my late 20's, NOT a Bible pusher (none of my churches have ever promoted that), an open minded and respectful human - You all that are shouting for closure are just as bad as the Evangelicals / Extreme Christians that cram religion down throatas bad as the Evangelicals / Extreme Christians that cram religion down throatas the Evangelicals / Extreme Christians that cram religion down throats.

Had you concentrated on the Social Sciences as I have done, History, Sociology and Psychology you might have a clearer understanding of how the human mind creates and maintains the framework for understanding and defining «Reality».

Those of a less determinist mind look upon culture and religion as examples of the human ability to transcend our genes, to see ourselves as more than our inheritance.

These it takes as the conditions for nurturing «qualities of mind and character» (ICC 25) that have enabled and should again serve to enable «generations of men and women to grasp a vision of the good life, a life of responsible citizenship and human decency» (ICC 6).

It will always boggle my mind how people somehow think the advancement of the human species or even the universe is the same as morality.

Im not understanding I guess... you object to my statement that the creator of the universe, as humans generally portray «him» — would have be superior intellectually to our greatest minds by a wide margin?

As described in my article on The Judeo - Christian Origin of Science» [1], science is based on specific fundamental beliefs about the natural world, namely that matter is good, rational and contingent and open to the human mind, and that any discoveries that may be made should be shared freely.

Such human «mindfulness» should be reflected upon in order to understand what the success of science means, and, as a result, in discerning an absolute Mind to be worshipped.

These two facts underline the fusion of body, mind, and spirit in power as a human reality.

It can be shown, on the contrary, that just as the natural sciences yield a comprehensive view of man, so the picture of human nature provided by the social sciences is that of a three-fold integration of body, mind, and spirit.

everything is made up of atoms (don't believe me do some research) its the different variables of heat and light and things like that that cause different reactions to make different things and these things when they interact can create something completely different and you and slowly the process of mitosis or miosis starts to work and form stuff hell i learnt that in high school and it was a catholic one at that a millions of years ago i bet the universe was completely different and had things in it that our minds cant even imagine that have since changed over time from action and reaction to what we have today and in another million years who knows with all the different gases we pump into the air and the weather getting more intense on both ends of the scale life as we know it will be different the human race will have to evolve to survive and will probibly form into a slightly different species hell maybe well evolve into 2 different species like in the movie time machine

As for the basic secrets of the cosmos, Jeans says, «The ultimate realities of the universe are at present quite beyond the reach of science, and may be — and probably are — forever beyond the comprehension of the human mind.»

His point was that human language could convey knowledge of God, which meant that any form of revelation communicated the truth as it existed objectively first in God's mind and then in the structures of the world.

For while we are thus speaking foolishly of human relationships, we may suppose a difference of mind between them such as to render an understanding impossible.

In this sense, the human mind exhibits a resolution to a problem which first emerges with life itself; namely, the reconciliation of security and adventure: «The universe is to be conceived as attaining the active self - expression of its own variety of opposites, of its own freedom and its own necessity, of its own multiplicity and its own unity» (PR 531).

Its function as mind is not satisfied until it reduces the world to terms of thought — something human.

Therefore, let us see what happens if we regard religion as the outcome of a long preparation, as a new dimension of the evolutionary process, and not as heaven - sent or as a mere projection of the human mind.

The Faith movement's push for such coherence involves affirming, in a neo-Augustinian manner, the dynamic relationship of spiritual mind (whether of the absolute God or of the human soul in his image) with the objects of its knowing, as a metaphysical first principle.

We do find direction as well as control in the constitution of matter which leads to man, and through man to Christ as the Key to the meaning of Universe, the Centre of history and Lord of the Human mind and heart.

Religious beliefs and practices are observed and discussed, but treated as states of mind and social customs, mere human constructions unsupported by any transcendent reality.

The philosopher who did most to shape this vision of the world, Rene Descartes, regarded the human mind as wholly different in nature.

With the philosophy of Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650), the nature of reality was no longer seen as writ large over the universe only to be discovered by the exercise of reason but rather was what the human mind perceived, interpreted, made it to be («Cogito, ergo sum.

This is the risk of unfettered thinking whereby the human mind, as Augustine said, is stretched and stretched until eventually it encounters something that transcends and judges it, which is Truth.

Whereas the religious believer has interpreted these as due to the influence of the Spirit of God, the psychologist is aware of the many emotional tensions at work in the human mind, only some of which are realized by the subject himself.

We should never regard it as some final, definitive expression of the human mind beyond which thought can not progress.

On the other hand the human mind can not establish itself in its finitude and contingency as the ultimate judge of reality.

You don't KNOW my mind, you don't KNOW that people do just as many good things as bad things, and you don't KNOW that the vast majority of human beings are certainly wrong about human evil.

your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.

Lucretius thought that the soul nestled in the human breast; Descartes located it in the pineal gland; and process theologian John Cobb, following Alfred North Whitehead, hopes to find mind wandering as a thread through the «interstices of the brain,» But if we are truly dealing with metaphysics, then the mind and the soul, like the risen Christ, will not be anywhere, but holistically related to the body.

Further, we find in him a tough - minded realism about the actualities of human history as the mingling of the divine love and disordered human love.

All of the stories from all of Man's scriptures are fully accounted for, and so revolutionarily superseded, by Pandeism, which demonstrates the logical probability of all of these nonuniversal propostions as simply reflecting the miscomprehensions of the limited human mind in attempting to grasp an ultimate underlying reality.

Concerned principally with international conflicts, Grotius held that humans are, on the one hand, inherently prone to strife as a result of their conflicting purposes or ideas of the good and, on the other, socially - minded beings who want to live together.

Charles W. Morris, in Six Theories of Mind, writes: «Whitehead's course of procedure is to give a comprehensive description of human experience and then to take this description as a key to the nature of reality» (quoted in 1:51).