Sentences with phrase «of the human species»

So, banks, shadow banks, and anyone else of systemic importance, I implore you: for the good of everyone, by which I mean for the good of the human species, keep this garbage, and anything connected to it, the hell off of your balance sheets.

Atheists aren't innocent either: eugenics, the belief that certain races do not deserve to live because they could hinder the evolution of the human species.

Indeed, «work» is so far typical of the human species that it is reasonable to add it to the epithets by which we distinguish it: Homo sapiens is Homo laborans — a «worker.»

i believe in something, and that is the unity of our human species.

WE ARE ALL OF THE HUMAN SPECIES AND WE ALL BLEED RED BLOOD!!

So we Christians do not oppose nuclear weapons because they threaten to destroy «mother earth,» but because the God we serve would not have one life unjustly taken even if such a killing would insure the survival of the human species.

It does not belong in public and is detrimental to the progress of the human species.

To put forth such an argument shows just how little the commenter knows about the dynamics of the human species.

It will always boggle my mind how people somehow think the advancement of the human species or even the universe is the same as morality.

The time and place of the origin of the human species is not a religious question.

Let us admit this frankly, once and for all: what most discredits faith in progress in the eyes of men today, over and above its reticences and its helplessness in meeting the cry of the «last days of the human species», is the unfortunate tendency still shown by its adepts to distort into pitiful millenarianisms all that is most valid and most noble in our now permanently awakened expectation of the future appearance of some form of «ultra-humanity».

And this is exactly what could best relieve that tension between light and darkness, exaltation and anguish, into which a renewed awareness of our human species has plunged us.

We have reached that point in the evolution of the human species where traditional tribalism must be superseded by the acceptance of the essential unity of all human society.

The twenty - first century will be a severe test of the human species.

Even up till modern times class and caste divisions have obscured the unity of the human species, while animal lovers have frequently projected their own human consciousness into animal experience.

Now it is entirely possible, as I have said earlier, that the appearance of the human species with its peculiar form of consciousness is by no means the end of evolution.

To put it simply, the concept of gods bares no merit at this current stage in the evolution of the human species and it would be a betterment to the species to have the concept removed from accepted delusional realities so prevalent in todays society.

I am certain the «creation» of this «show» alone could deny further evolution of the human species!

It is true that a variety of widely accepted norms, including the keeping of certain promises, the abhorrence of unjustified killing of human beings, and perhaps even the sanctity of property rights, promote the adaption of the human species to its environment.

The prospects for conscious control of human biological evolution posed by recombinant DNA research raise directly and sharply certain questions about the future not only of our own culture but also of the human species itself.

Thus, in spite of the centrality Western culture gives to «being intimate,» the Wynnes view intimacy as a supplementary, not an essential, process «for strengthening the bonding that has been crucial for the survival of the human species throughout the ages.»

In a world shrunk by travel and communications technologies, one which can no longer afford conflict arising from ethnocentric prejudice, the appreciation of other religious and cultural views is necessary for the survival of the human species.

This was especially to be affirmed of the human species.

That would be fine if women had some innate ability to detect desirable or undesirable traits that might fit into a long term plan for development of the human species, and were uniformly intelligent and responsible enough to adhere to such a plan.

«There would, however, be a method by which, if the orangutan and others were of the human species, the crudest observers could assure themselves of it even by demonstration; but since a single generation would not suffice for this experiment, it must be considered impracticable, because it would be necessary for what is only an hypothesis to be already proved true before the experiment that was to prove it true could be tried innocently.»

Further, the Marxist understanding of human nature views social history as the process of the human species» selfcreation.

Most sociologists believe that evolutionary biology is crucial for understanding the many social insti.tutions of the human species, of which religion is only one.

Rad - con doctrine concedes the reality of a human species but only as it can be located in individuated clusters of genetic material — blobs of vulnerable stuff that is ever changing and passing away.

These and other unique properties of the human species must have been among the potentialities of the primordial life and the primordial cosmic substratum.

As pointed out above, a potentiality of mind must have been present in all ancestors of the human species, down to the primordial life.

What the devout mind worships as God is accordingly nothing but the idea of the human species imagined as a perfect individual.

He thereby participates in the reconstruction of the world of ideas that is the unique and most precious property of the human species.

«Despite the many changes that have taken place in American society and culture over the past 30 years, including new discoveries in biological and social science, there has been virtually no sustained change in Americans» views of the origin of the human species since 1982,» wrote Gallup's Frank Newport.

In the context of created life as a whole, and in the continuance of the human species, we can see that death has a positive role to play.

all these are, partially or completely, concerned with the ecological problems of the human species.

-- Last but not least, as members of the human species, our universal responsibility is to encourage comprehension and appreciation for the excellence of the human spirit in all its manifestations; and for inspiring awe and wonder for a cosmos that brought forth life and consciousness and holds out the possibility of its continued evolution toward higher levels of insight, understanding, love, and compassion.

By shifting our attention from the now completely irrelevant and anachronistic politics of nationalism and military power to the problems of the human species and the still inchoate politics of human ecology we shall be killing two birds with one stone — reducing the threat of sudden destruction by scientific war and at the same time reducing the threat of a more gradual biological disaster.

We also belong to the history of the human species.

In the case of the human species, we have evolved not only in a symbiotic relationship with the physical environment of the earth but with another kind of environment, known as human culture.

The line OY, faith in God, soars upward, indifferent to any thought of an ultra-evolution of the human species, while the line OX, faith in the World, formally denies (at least in words) the existence of any transcendent God.

In his breathtaking conceptualization of planetary life, he saw the emergence of the human species and the subsequent globalization of the planet not in terms of the conquest of the globe by Christianity but as the logical consequence of an ongoing evolutionary process.

«Catholic theology affirms that the emergence of the first members of the human species (whether as individuals or in populations) represents an event that is not susceptible of a purely natural explanation and which can appropriately be attributed to divine intervention.»

The first point is the division of the human species into male and female actually leaves a space in which God can take the initiative and unite human nature to Himself.

Yet, it has contributed equally to the possibility of the extinction of human species and the planet through the discovery of weapons capable of omnicide and the technologies that devastate ecosystems.

When scientists announce that the chemistry of DNA is so certain, universal and uniform that all forms of life on earth are essentially the same, a credulous public jumps to the conclusion that traditional claims for the uniqueness of the human species have been nullified.

The white world is unable to integrate black - skinned people into their view of the human species.

If saving the biosphere involved the extinction of the human species, that would not save the world I have in mind.

With regard to Callahan's comparison of the lives of PVS patients with the lives of «fertilized eggs,» I would simply note that once an egg has been fertilized it is no longer an egg but a new living being, and in the case of the human species, a new human being — surely a being of incomparably greater value than an «egg.»

But the fate of the human species is foremost in my thinking.

If we begin with a vision of planetary brotherhood living in ways that allow for the perpetuation of the human species on earth, then the specifics can be worked on.