Sentences with phrase «of the privacy interests»

Courts in Canada and the United States are increasingly required to weigh in on balancing the interests in law enforcement using new technologies and the potential infringement of privacy interests.
In light of the privacy interests at stake, however, he agreed that the majority's conclusion was the best solution.
To ensure that intrusion of seclusion was not applied to broadly, the court defined the type of privacy interests that would be affected:
Although Canadians have a legitimate concern in ensuring our national security, this does not mean abandoning all of our privacy interests to government without proper justification.
It must also be considered from the perspective of the public - its awareness and enforcement of privacy interests.
Protection of those privacy interests by providing a common law remedy for their violation would be consistent with the Charter values and an «incremental revision» and logical extension of the existing jurisprudence.
The dissent by Justice O'Ferrall, however, analyzed and compared how the significance of privacy interests may vary depending upon the degree of intrusion irrespective of whether the object of the search or seizure is possessed by a third party.
«The Supreme Court has recognized the importance of privacy interests in a new technology,» says Wendy Matheson, a partner at Torys LLP in Toronto who represented the Canadian Civil Liberties Association in Telus.
With blogs, there is even less of a privacy interest given the public nature if their readership.
The Supreme Court did not give the union carte blanche and examined the specific expressive activity noting that «like privacy, freedom of expression is not an absolute value and both the nature of the privacy interests implicated and the nature of the expression must be considered in striking an appropriate balance».
[9] In a law review article written in 1960, the leading American torts scholar, William Prosser, listed four distinct kinds of invasion of privacy interests as follows: (i) intrusion upon the plaintiff's seclusion or solitude, or into his private affairs; (ii) public disclosure of embarrassing private facts about the plaintiff; (iii) publicity which places the plaintiff in a false light in the public eye; and (iv) appropriation, for the defendant's advantage, of the plaintiff's name or likeness: see William L. Prosser, «Privacy» (1960) 48 Cal.
For weeks, Facebook has faced criticism for appearing to put its own financial interests ahead of the privacy interests of users in the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Not exact matches

The case pits the interests of tech companies and privacy advocates in protecting customer data against the demands of law enforcement in gaining information vital to criminal and counterterrorism investigations.
«Our bill, the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, would resolve the question currently before the Court in a way that balances consumer, law enforcement, and privacy interests.
But, in the interest of privacy, he hasn't come out to the world, particularly to the shareholders, analysts and customers of Apple.
• to provide the information, products and services you request; • to provide you with effective customer service; • to provide you with a personalized experience when you use this Site; • to contact you with information and notices related to your use of this Site; • to contact you with special offers and other information we believe will be of interest to you (in accordance with any privacy preferences you have expressed to us); • to invite you to participate in surveys and provide Feedback to us (in accordance with any privacy preferences you have expressed to us); • to improve the content, functionality and usability of this Site; • to better understand your needs and interests; • to improve our products and services; • to improve our marketing and promotional efforts; • for security, credit or fraud prevention purposes; and • for any other purpose identified in an applicable Privacy Notice, click - through agreement or other agreement between you privacy preferences you have expressed to us); • to invite you to participate in surveys and provide Feedback to us (in accordance with any privacy preferences you have expressed to us); • to improve the content, functionality and usability of this Site; • to better understand your needs and interests; • to improve our products and services; • to improve our marketing and promotional efforts; • for security, credit or fraud prevention purposes; and • for any other purpose identified in an applicable Privacy Notice, click - through agreement or other agreement between you privacy preferences you have expressed to us); • to improve the content, functionality and usability of this Site; • to better understand your needs and interests; • to improve our products and services; • to improve our marketing and promotional efforts; • for security, credit or fraud prevention purposes; and • for any other purpose identified in an applicable Privacy Notice, click - through agreement or other agreement between you Privacy Notice, click - through agreement or other agreement between you and us.
Given the last of its published principles, it will be interesting to see which executive Facebook chooses to send to testify in front of Congress — to explain things like how it failed to protect the privacy of ~ 50M users nor even inform people their data had been siphoned off for illicit purposes.
As I argue in my forthcoming book, «The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America,» big corporations (in this case, Facebook) and political interests (in this case, right - wing parties and campaigns) but also ordinary Americans (social media users, and thus likely you and me) all had a hand in it.
But Europe is about to point to a better way of balancing the interests of technological innovation and privacy concerns.
So it's a great time to write to your reps reminding them you're far more interested in your privacy being protected than Facebook winning some kind of surveillance arms race with the Chinese.
«The Cambridge Analytica scandal, like many recent headlines coming out of Silicon Valley, raises questions about whether Big Tech is doing enough to balance its own interests with one of its biggest responsibilities: Safeguarding your privacy
10:41 am ET: Rep. Anna Eshoo just asked Zuckerberg if he would change Facebook's business model «in the interest of protecting individual privacy
A whole discussion can be had about the effect of the Bitcoin network and value on the interest and price of alternative cryptocurrencies, but the point is that for the purpose of privacy it can be relatively easy and cheap to move into Monero and back out in Bitcoin, or at some exchanges, directly into cash.
In addition to the uses identified elsewhere in this Privacy Policy, we may use your Personal Information to: (a) improve your browsing experience by personalizing the Websites and to improve the Subscription Services; (b) send information to you which we think may be of interest to you by post, email, or other means; (c) send you marketing communications relating to our business or the businesses of carefully - selected third parties which we think may be of interest to you, and (d) provide other companies with statistical information about our users — but this information will not be used to identify any individual user.
NuCypher is a solution that will be of particular interest to those building decentralized application that deals with private or sensitive data as it will enable a privacy layer for public blockchain and decentralized applications through a technology called proxy re-encryption.
The new Privacy Shortcuts menu, being rolled out in the coming weeks, will let people regulate the amount of personal information the social media giant keeps on them, like political preferences and interests, and delete things they've already shared.
Since Stephen Harper and David Cameron seem to be on the same wavelength, and the UK thinks it can trash census and turn to isources like credit records for its information needs, the story below on privacy, from Alberta, may be of possible interest.
In the first quarter of this year, concerns about consumer data privacy and potentially tighter regulatory controls exacerbated existing investor nervousness tied to speculation the US Federal Reserve would quicken the pace of interest - rate hikes in response to higher wage growth.
Apple CEO Tim Cook has so far refused, arguing that if the company were to comply it would set a bad precedent and harm the privacy interests of Apple customers around the world.
While its secret services penetrate everywhere and plug in to the most intimate conversations, it pleads a touching concern for confidentiality, and makes a sensitive display of worrying about the question of a privacy in which all that is private is the interest of the exploiters.
In summary, the DOD homosexual exclusion policy is designed to preserve, promote, and protect legitimate military interests, which include the personal privacy rights of service members.
Such is the premise of CBS's Person of Interest, an hour - long drama thematically resonating with debates over individual privacy and national security.
As Religious Freedom and the Constitution illustrates, we tend to assume that the independence and autonomy of churches derive from, and exist for, the privacy and liberty interests of individual persons.
A great part of my work has been listening to people, in that particular intense privacy of confession, or at least unburdening, and it has been very interesting to me.
No, for the 5» 10 1/2», 204 - pound, 30 - year - old running back who lists drums and privacy as two of his main interests, pain is being trapped like this, having to talk about yourself, getting probed, not pounding on something or somebody, not moving.
The Privacy statement explains, «First 1000 Days [that is, Danone] will import, use, and retain your basic information, which includes your name and profile picture as well as your e-mail address, list of friends, and may also include your Likes and Interests as well as information you make public on Facebook.»
I think comments about privacy are interesting, and I have some experience of dealing with these issues.
If «directs» includes a case where a US President «asks» (or directs someone else to «ask») a member of the Supreme Court to rule in a certain way while making it clear that it is in the best interest (financial, safety, privacy, etc) of the Supreme Court member to rule that way, then I'm sure it has at various times already happened... just part of politics and human nature.
He also said security concerns were likely moot given the passage of time, and noted a 1988 case that said former New York City mayor Ed Koch's «private» schedules were subject to public scrutiny if public interests outweighed the argument for privacy.
«In fact, the Act explicitly allows public authorities to interfere with an individual's right to privacy in the interests of public safety or for the prevention or detection of crime.»
Cuomo says there could be ways devised to disclose outside business interests and still protect the privacy of clients.
Particular areas of interest include: counter-terrorism law; «horizontal effect» under the Human Rights Act; privacy, libel, hate speech and pornography; public protest and direct action; House of Lords reform.
But says he believed at the time that he acted in the «best interest» of the alleged victims, who had sought privacy.
There is a clear public interest in investigating the activities of this billionaire political donor and privacy campaigner.
That response drew yet another from the university and its public record custodian urging the state appellate court to either protect the competitive interests of Arizona's higher educational institutions by defending «the freedom, vigor, candor and integrity of the researchers who work there» or rule on its own that «the need to protect the confidentiality and privacy of the work done at Arizona's universities» outweighs the public's right to know.
PRIVACY NOT PROTECTED In «Don't Worry about Who's Watching» [TechnoFiles], David Pogue assures us that there is little to fear about the potentially vast database that an interested party might assemble about any or all of us in a matter of days.
They should support individual privacy rights and understand how privacy rights are affected by the increasingly interconnected banks of information about individuals and our activities and interests.
A brand new science for studying this networked phenomenon, and in effect it's kind of a reverse engineering the World Wide Web that we know and the kinds of networks that we see on that to try to figure out how they took shape and maybe from that we can learn what principles involve and how networks do grow and you might be able to use that sort of thing to be able to develop a better system s for example being able to create more efficient networks and that could be very valuable in industry, there may be a lot of practical applications, involving protecting privacy, for example, and stopping people from stealing identities; and you should, you know, should be of just an interesting phenomenon.
Blumenstock emphasized that the research is conducted in a way that respects ethical standards and the privacy of the callers, as well as the competitive interests of the phone company providing the data.
For geeks with an interest in privacy, Paul is unique among his peers in his ardent support of online freedoms.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z