I have also read as many
of the sacred texts of other religions as I can find, something a True Believer would not, as a rule, do, since they have found the One True Religion, just as the followers of all other religions have.
In a sort of reverse Orientalism, Traditionalists find that ideal in a decontextualized harmony
of the sacred texts of non-Western societies, and particularly in Islam.
Not exact matches
Arguing that the Quran incites violence, it insisted that «the verses
of the Quran calling for murder and punishment
of Jews, Christians, and nonbelievers be struck to obsolescence by religious authorities,» so that «no believer can refer to a
sacred text to commit a crime.»
The Hindus had a rich heritage
of the 4 Vedas — the oldest
of the
sacred texts.
There are many, many schools which prohibit any and all music with a religious
text from their curricula and prohibit teachers from programming such music for concerts no matter how balanced the program may be (that is, it encompasses secular and
sacred, accompanied and unaccompanied, difficult and easy, music in a variety
of styles and from a variety
of musical eras.
Hinduism for example has mentioning
of evolution in their
sacred texts.
In the same breath, let us also just believe that the religious fanaticism shown by some Muslims is also an act
of corruption
of their own
sacred text.
He loved coming in each week knowing that readings had been assigned, and that he, like millions
of others, would be submitting himself to the
sacred texts, not subjecting it to his own consumeristic impulse.
At a revival / carnival he publicly attacks a
sacred text of another religion to taunt and provoke them and become a reality TV star.
Maybe when we give ourselves to ancient words and
sacred texts, and embrace routines and traditions, we can remember that we are not here for what we can get out
of worship; we are here to give ourselves away in worship.
We also believe, as it is written in our Bible (and yes these are
sacred texts as
sacred as
texts for any other religion so please be respectful) Israel is the chosen people
of God.
Every literary
text is essentially borne
of The Bible or another, similarly
sacred book.
The Bible was written as
sacred text, entire groups
of people dedicated their lives to faithfully reproducing it over thousands
of years.
The
sacred text of Islam, considered by Muslims to contain the revelations
of God to Muhammad.
Each
of these religions has different sets
of sacred texts, even if there's some overlapping.
Don't allow religious philosophy to intrude into biology classrooms and
texts, they say, for that is to soil the
sacred precincts
of science, which must be reserved for hypotheses that can be rigorously tested and confronted with data.
Now, apparently CNN has decided to reverse that decision and doesn't care about defiling
sacred texts and offending people
of faith.
One side tenderly enraptured by the notion
of a few, great
sacred texts to be preserved against the ravage
of time as a precious resource without which we shall surely perish as a people.
This is fascinating — I think a lot
of people who are basically atheists «try» religion in this sense — reading
sacred texts, reciting prayers, even attending church.
For this task, Christians need the help
of the original proprietors, and both parties will find that both the distinctiveness and the depth
of their respective roots in the shared
sacred text are increased rather than diminished by their collaboration.»
What was new to me — listening with the ear
of the heart (as St. Benedict puts it) to
sacred texts until they lead the listener to prayer — was actually very old.
My prayer is that all
of our daughters (and sons) would also experience these
sacred texts in this way.
Polanyi places this idea in historical context: «when the supernatural authority
of laws, churches and
sacred texts had waned or collapsed, man tried to avoid the emptiness
of mere self - assertion by establishing over himself the authority
of experience and reason.»
Sometimes the words
of the
sacred text are thought to be the very words
of God himself, ipsissima verba, the human element in the situation being merely instrumental.
In our personal devotions also we can be enriched by the
sacred texts of the world.
Paul was writing to Christians whom he had never seen, but expected soon to see, and he sets forth the common faith which he is sure they already hold — «the gospel
of God, (See Mark 1:14 — though the
text may originally have read, «the gospel
of the Kingdom
of God,» as in the A. V.) which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the
sacred writings,
valerie0423 Have you ever taken the time to read any
of the mythologies or other
sacred texts of rival religions to prove them false?
So, while it may be problematic to make too much
of the distinction between Scripture and Christ, I think that evangelicalism will benefit from a reminder that our faith centers around the living person
of Jesus Christ — the World Made Flesh — not on the
sacred texts that point to him.
If we aren't willing to learn about the contexts and histories
of the
texts we hold so
sacred, then it's difficult to prove we are serious about following them.
It provides an elevated tone
of voice that takes the
texts out
of the everyday and confirms them as
sacred.
We know that there is also wisdom to be found, much
of it similar to Biblical wisdom, in the
sacred texts and stories
of other faiths and traditions and we are glad to have those, also, to help us discern the direction
of our lives and paths.
That theirs is * the * way and the * only * way, with an absolutely literal interpretation
of their
sacred texts, and a conviction that we, therefore, are inferior people on the wrong side
of God.
The
sacred text was read with the Fathers
of the Church, accompanied by commentaries and catenae, with frequent glosses explaining the meaning
of difficult....
That subject matter, whether
sacred texts only or inclusive
of other «extra-Christian» or «secular»
texts, is understood to be publicly available and publicly explicable.
Gregorian chant gives an elevated tone
of voice to the
texts of our
sacred praises, conveying the special character
of the words and the holy nature
of what is being enacted and undertaken.
It is through an acceptance
of the humanness
of our
sacred text, rather than a denial
of it, that we discover God's inspiration.
Progressive religious folks
of all stripes tend to share a post-triumphalism (a sense that it's time to move beyond the old triumphalist paradigm in which one religion is The Right Path to God and all the other paths are wrong), as well as an inclination toward reading our
sacred texts through interpretive lenses which take into account changing social mores and changing understandings
of justice.
Spirituality is supposed to bring us together, but every organized religion on earth that is not openly mocked by the majority
of people on earth has women can't do this and women shouldn't do that hardwired into the dogma and spelled out in
sacred text.
We experience God and revelation as perennially - unfolding, which means there's always room for new ways
of understanding divinity and
sacred text, especially when the old ways
of understanding them (e.g. antiquated readings
of Leviticus 18:22) turn out to be hurtful or to seem misguided.
There's a kind
of sharing and intellectual / spiritual intimacy which is only possible after a few days
of dining together, learning together, studying our
sacred texts together.
So, although we refer to the Bible as our
sacred text, it is more accurately a collection
of texts which have become
sacred to the Church.
Meditation entailed a memorization
of notable content so that the monk could ruminate over the
sacred text throughout the day and slowly absorb its nutrients, like a cow chewing its cud.
There is even a hint
of idolatry about the cult
of admiration for C.S. Lewis that began forming even during his life, with its shrines,
sacred texts, keepers
of the flame, and theological niceties.
During World War II, according to Dr. Holtom, Shinto nationalists hecjuently declared that the most
sacred of all theft
texts was the «divine» edict pronounced by Arnaterasu - Omi - Karni when she sent her grandson down from Talamaga - Hara to establish the state.
However, even this has undergone change, because to the original Avestan
text has been added a commentary, or paraphrase, to some
of the material, and this material has also come to be regarded as
sacred.
After she views the
text of the
sacred manuscript, she begins to experience miraculous changes in her own heart.
The conflict comes in for certain sects
of religions where the literal interpretation
of sacred texts is taught.
It is relevant to note here that
sacred texts of the Hindu religion such as Vedas and Mantras were not accessible to Dalits as a rule.
Gadamer,
of how the inspired
text, which we question in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly in doing so; for in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study
of sacred theology into a venture in secular ideology.
It is this misunderstand and lack
of knowledge that leads people to contemplate and assert the existence
of god with no real proof or evidence other than a
sacred collection
of texts written over the last few thousand years.