Sentences with phrase «of the same gender in»

This reference is talking about h e t e r o s e x u a l people who gave up their natural orientation to have s e x with people of the same gender in what Paul calls, «Their search for pleasure.»
G Adventures and Intrepid both specialize in small group travel and will pair up single travelers of the same gender in rooms without extra charge.
If you are traveling solo and wish to be paired up with another solo traveler of the same gender in order to avoid the single supplement fee, please let your Adventure Consultant know at the time of booking.

Not exact matches

Overall, though, Millennials of both genders seem to have more in common with one another than they do with older people of their same sex.
The company, which already had one of the most liberal paternity leave policies among U.S. companies with 17 paid weeks for both mothers and fathers, expanded its policy to employees outside the U.S. and became gender neutral, allowing same - sex couples to participate in the program.
In the case of gender diversity, the problem for our industry is clear: uniform blocks of thinkers by their very nature tend to think in the same wayIn the case of gender diversity, the problem for our industry is clear: uniform blocks of thinkers by their very nature tend to think in the same wayin the same ways.
These include spending over half household income on housing, sleeping two or more people per bedroom (excluding couples and same - gender children), being behind on the rent in the past year and / or living in a building that suffers from any two of: frequent elevator breakdowns, pests or broken entrance locks.
However, hypothetically, if I encountered two identical startups with the exception of the gender of the CEO, with exactly the same chance of success, at exactly the same time, with exactly the same investment terms and conditions, and had equal opportunity to invest in either, there would still be something about the startups that would tip my decision in favour of one over the other.
First, you're one of my heroes, and not just because of how much I've learned from your economic analysis over the years, but also because my daughters are growing up in a world where the world's chief economist is the same gender they are.
In the past decade, America has seen its first African - American president, the constitutional recognition of a right to same - sex marriage, and a new discourse on gender identity and workplace harassment.
While general impact investing is becoming more mainstream for high net worth individuals and institutions, gender lens investing has not benefitted from the same level of traction in the private equity and venture capital space.
Based on a 2016 internal study on gender pay equity, we determined that in the U.S., women employees earn 100 % of what men make in the same role.
The same is true of gender and minority representation, since the expectations of the day, unfortunate as they were, didn't commonly include the belief held by many today that Parliament should look, think, and care about issues in broadly similar ways to the country at large.
I think your attractions develop and with that knowledge, I think that maybe someone may have developed in a different way acquiring an attraction to someone of the same gender.
Still, it may be worth pondering that in this brave new world, those who uphold the old and much derided «gender binary» — or, to speak more properly, the ancient understanding that there is a real and normative difference between the sexes — will be the ones who can actually see some sort of meaning, however misguided, in things like same - sex desire and gender dysphoria.
So in our current environment we should no doubt prefer to speak of «same gender attraction.»
How gay marriage does fit in to all of this I don't understand.I might understand it if you thought that people are gender based in their capability to love and care.And I would understand if you would think that a married couple should not be of the same sex..
Two parents can be Mom and Dad, Mom and Mom, Dad and Dad... studies prove that children do just as well in same gender homes than they do in hetero homes (the link to the study is listed above in response to another blathering of yours).
If a human being has the gender of «male» AND that same human being is not the property of a man / woman / master, then the Bible, in both the OT and the NT, under Law and under Grace, does endorse sexual intercourse outside of marriage.
If a human being has the gender of «female» AND that same human being is the property of a man / woman / master, then the Bible, in both the OT and the NT, under Law and under Grace, endorses / mandates abstaining from sexual intercourse.
Outside the Noah - Ham episode (which likely has to do with Ham emasculating his drunken father), the contexts for these other occurrences suggest no ambiguity of gender (e.g., of Abraham pitching his tent in Gen 12:8 and 13:3; and Jacob doing the same in Gen 35:21).
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
But, approval of hom.ose.xuality in no way implies approval of same - gender marriages.
There were outward differences among the couples on the floor — different races, different gender combinations, etc. — but the central message of the moment was that the «sameness» is in the love — hence the song, «Same Love.»
In a 2015 poll, LifeWay Research found that 70 percent of evangelicals without gay or lesbian friends believe that «sex between people of the same gender is sinful, regardless of its legality,» while 62 percent of evangelicals with such friends say likewise.
[Notably, many of the texts in question are the exact same texts — the Household Codes of Ephesians, Colossians, and 1 Peter — that are used today to support gender hierarchy in the home.
Why, just out in my home state of California... the Church of Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints (Mormons) and... the Catholics, decided to get together and pour millions of dollars into California to defeat, proposition 8, which is... about 2 people of the same gender being able to marry and have the same civil rights under the law as hetero - married couples.
Then remember, in the first creation of man, it was Adam, and Eve, not of the same kind, or gender, but no one can even begin to judge another if they are of flesh, and blood, other than the Almighty Creator YHWH.
Where Jesus does say something in the Gospels regarding adultery or in other words to not have relations outside of marriage, how is same gender relations be considered an exception to committing adultery since there is no known record of same gender marriage in first century Palestine?
No one suggests outlawing Christianity in this country, but many Christians have no problem outlawing the ultimate expression of love (marriage) to others simply because they are attracted to the same gender.
«Then, in October at a meeting at the University of Southern California, same - gender activists shouted down a speaker and then took over the stage and the microphone»
@Mark by the Middle River: He personally funded the caimpaings of republican candidates, using the ideasl of family values, in an effort reverse same - gender marriage in his state.
In November 1992, the voters of Colorado, in a referendum, foreclosed to legislatures at all levels the authority to treat gays and lesbians on the same plane as groups that have suffered discrimination based on race, religion, and gendeIn November 1992, the voters of Colorado, in a referendum, foreclosed to legislatures at all levels the authority to treat gays and lesbians on the same plane as groups that have suffered discrimination based on race, religion, and gendein a referendum, foreclosed to legislatures at all levels the authority to treat gays and lesbians on the same plane as groups that have suffered discrimination based on race, religion, and gender.
Personally, I find Christians that only care about preserving their moral supremacy at the cost of everyone else to be a far greater evil than same gender oriented individuals seeking equal treamtent in a country founded on the principles of freedom and equality.
Two people of the same gender will be able to better relate to one another on a number of levels, increasing the communication and intimacy in the relationship and therefore increasing the benefits outlined above.
(I don't mean to say that straight couples do not achieve this in the same measure at times — not all couple, gay or straight so, though — but that it may be somewhat easier for gay couples in the same way it is easier for two people of the same gender to develop a strong friendship, which is the basis of any good relationship.)
In the USA 1 in 6 children will go hungry today... if those same children can be given the chance to eat today because two people of the same gender living happily and peacefully are able to provide for them, then why fight iIn the USA 1 in 6 children will go hungry today... if those same children can be given the chance to eat today because two people of the same gender living happily and peacefully are able to provide for them, then why fight iin 6 children will go hungry today... if those same children can be given the chance to eat today because two people of the same gender living happily and peacefully are able to provide for them, then why fight it?
The distinction between persons of a homosexual orientation and people who choose to engage in same - gender sexual acts comes from the growing conviction that for a percentage of every population, homosexuality is a given, a life orientation that they did not choose.
As most same - gender - loving people in fundamentalist houses of worship, Marcus lived a double life, or on the «down low,» for he felt it was the only way to continue in ministry and stay connected to the community he loved.
Today I woke up in a world where I, as as man, still face a reality: the expectations of my gender are pretty much the same as they have been for ages, whereas women now have greater flexibility.
I could care less if the legal union of a same - gender couple is called marriage... doesn't bother me in the slightest.
Other religions can support the religious ceremony of marriage between a same - gender couple and I will certainly not stand in the way.
There are many animal species that have a percentage of their population that is EXCLUSIVELY attracted to the same gender and NEVER in their lifetime mate with the opposite gender.
There is no other mechanism available to same gender couples to choose one's next of kin in the way that the single marriage contract can do.
The same people who think only men should be pastors, probably have other (hidden) criteria related to sexuality and genderin my experience, a majority of pastors are straight, married, cisgender men.
Throughout God and the Gay Christian we see how patriarchy and ancient understandings of gender roles affected how same - sex behavior is referenced in Scripture.
The apostle Paul makes the very same appeal to «natural» and «unnatural,» in the context of gender roles, when he argues that women should wear head coverings: «Judge for yourself,» he writes, «Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?
Bisexual activist Robyn Ochs has a commonly used definition saying, «I call myself bisexual because I acknowledge that I have in myself the potential to be attracted — romantically and / or sexually — to people of more than one sex and / or gender, not necessarily at the same time, not necessarily in the same way, and not necessarily to the same degree.»
For ninety - nine percent of the population who have never questioned if they are male or female because their gender identity aligns with their biological sex, I challenge you in the same way Jesus challenged his disciples — try to wrap your brain around the fact that not everyone is wired as you are; you are in the fortunate majority that somehow beat the odds in the crap - shoot of gender identity.
Representatives from the same group of privileged people who dominated conversations in the 20th century continue to dominate the conversations about current issues such as modesty culture, immigration reform, relevancy in culturally - diverse America, gender issues, and more.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z