This reference is talking about h e t e r o s e x u a l people who gave up their natural orientation to have s e x with people
of the same gender in what Paul calls, «Their search for pleasure.»
G Adventures and Intrepid both specialize in small group travel and will pair up single travelers
of the same gender in rooms without extra charge.
If you are traveling solo and wish to be paired up with another solo traveler
of the same gender in order to avoid the single supplement fee, please let your Adventure Consultant know at the time of booking.
Not exact matches
Overall, though, Millennials
of both
genders seem to have more
in common with one another than they do with older people
of their
same sex.
The company, which already had one
of the most liberal paternity leave policies among U.S. companies with 17 paid weeks for both mothers and fathers, expanded its policy to employees outside the U.S. and became
gender neutral, allowing
same - sex couples to participate
in the program.
In the case of gender diversity, the problem for our industry is clear: uniform blocks of thinkers by their very nature tend to think in the same way
In the case
of gender diversity, the problem for our industry is clear: uniform blocks
of thinkers by their very nature tend to think
in the same way
in the
same ways.
These include spending over half household income on housing, sleeping two or more people per bedroom (excluding couples and
same -
gender children), being behind on the rent
in the past year and / or living
in a building that suffers from any two
of: frequent elevator breakdowns, pests or broken entrance locks.
However, hypothetically, if I encountered two identical startups with the exception
of the
gender of the CEO, with exactly the
same chance
of success, at exactly the
same time, with exactly the
same investment terms and conditions, and had equal opportunity to invest
in either, there would still be something about the startups that would tip my decision
in favour
of one over the other.
First, you're one
of my heroes, and not just because
of how much I've learned from your economic analysis over the years, but also because my daughters are growing up
in a world where the world's chief economist is the
same gender they are.
In the past decade, America has seen its first African - American president, the constitutional recognition
of a right to
same - sex marriage, and a new discourse on
gender identity and workplace harassment.
While general impact investing is becoming more mainstream for high net worth individuals and institutions,
gender lens investing has not benefitted from the
same level
of traction
in the private equity and venture capital space.
Based on a 2016 internal study on
gender pay equity, we determined that
in the U.S., women employees earn 100 %
of what men make
in the
same role.
The
same is true
of gender and minority representation, since the expectations
of the day, unfortunate as they were, didn't commonly include the belief held by many today that Parliament should look, think, and care about issues
in broadly similar ways to the country at large.
I think your attractions develop and with that knowledge, I think that maybe someone may have developed
in a different way acquiring an attraction to someone
of the
same gender.
Still, it may be worth pondering that
in this brave new world, those who uphold the old and much derided «
gender binary» — or, to speak more properly, the ancient understanding that there is a real and normative difference between the sexes — will be the ones who can actually see some sort
of meaning, however misguided,
in things like
same - sex desire and
gender dysphoria.
So
in our current environment we should no doubt prefer to speak
of «
same gender attraction.»
How gay marriage does fit
in to all
of this I don't understand.I might understand it if you thought that people are
gender based
in their capability to love and care.And I would understand if you would think that a married couple should not be
of the
same sex..
Two parents can be Mom and Dad, Mom and Mom, Dad and Dad... studies prove that children do just as well
in same gender homes than they do
in hetero homes (the link to the study is listed above
in response to another blathering
of yours).
If a human being has the
gender of «male» AND that
same human being is not the property
of a man / woman / master, then the Bible,
in both the OT and the NT, under Law and under Grace, does endorse sexual intercourse outside
of marriage.
If a human being has the
gender of «female» AND that
same human being is the property
of a man / woman / master, then the Bible,
in both the OT and the NT, under Law and under Grace, endorses / mandates abstaining from sexual intercourse.
Outside the Noah - Ham episode (which likely has to do with Ham emasculating his drunken father), the contexts for these other occurrences suggest no ambiguity
of gender (e.g.,
of Abraham pitching his tent
in Gen 12:8 and 13:3; and Jacob doing the
same in Gen 35:21).
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part
of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence
of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence
of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching
in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the
same line
of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry
of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy
of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws
of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant
in one moment, but important enough to display
in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading
of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse
of Genesis 3 has the final word on
gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
But, approval
of hom.ose.xuality
in no way implies approval
of same -
gender marriages.
There were outward differences among the couples on the floor — different races, different
gender combinations, etc. — but the central message
of the moment was that the «sameness» is
in the love — hence the song, «
Same Love.»
In a 2015 poll, LifeWay Research found that 70 percent
of evangelicals without gay or lesbian friends believe that «sex between people
of the
same gender is sinful, regardless
of its legality,» while 62 percent
of evangelicals with such friends say likewise.
[Notably, many
of the texts
in question are the exact
same texts — the Household Codes
of Ephesians, Colossians, and 1 Peter — that are used today to support
gender hierarchy
in the home.
Why, just out
in my home state
of California... the Church
of Jesus Christ
of Later Day Saints (Mormons) and... the Catholics, decided to get together and pour millions
of dollars into California to defeat, proposition 8, which is... about 2 people
of the
same gender being able to marry and have the
same civil rights under the law as hetero - married couples.
Then remember,
in the first creation
of man, it was Adam, and Eve, not
of the
same kind, or
gender, but no one can even begin to judge another if they are
of flesh, and blood, other than the Almighty Creator YHWH.
Where Jesus does say something
in the Gospels regarding adultery or
in other words to not have relations outside
of marriage, how is
same gender relations be considered an exception to committing adultery since there is no known record
of same gender marriage
in first century Palestine?
No one suggests outlawing Christianity
in this country, but many Christians have no problem outlawing the ultimate expression
of love (marriage) to others simply because they are attracted to the
same gender.
«Then,
in October at a meeting at the University
of Southern California,
same -
gender activists shouted down a speaker and then took over the stage and the microphone»
@Mark by the Middle River: He personally funded the caimpaings
of republican candidates, using the ideasl
of family values,
in an effort reverse
same -
gender marriage
in his state.
In November 1992, the voters of Colorado, in a referendum, foreclosed to legislatures at all levels the authority to treat gays and lesbians on the same plane as groups that have suffered discrimination based on race, religion, and gende
In November 1992, the voters
of Colorado,
in a referendum, foreclosed to legislatures at all levels the authority to treat gays and lesbians on the same plane as groups that have suffered discrimination based on race, religion, and gende
in a referendum, foreclosed to legislatures at all levels the authority to treat gays and lesbians on the
same plane as groups that have suffered discrimination based on race, religion, and
gender.
Personally, I find Christians that only care about preserving their moral supremacy at the cost
of everyone else to be a far greater evil than
same gender oriented individuals seeking equal treamtent
in a country founded on the principles
of freedom and equality.
Two people
of the
same gender will be able to better relate to one another on a number
of levels, increasing the communication and intimacy
in the relationship and therefore increasing the benefits outlined above.
(I don't mean to say that straight couples do not achieve this
in the
same measure at times — not all couple, gay or straight so, though — but that it may be somewhat easier for gay couples
in the
same way it is easier for two people
of the
same gender to develop a strong friendship, which is the basis
of any good relationship.)
In the USA 1 in 6 children will go hungry today... if those same children can be given the chance to eat today because two people of the same gender living happily and peacefully are able to provide for them, then why fight i
In the USA 1
in 6 children will go hungry today... if those same children can be given the chance to eat today because two people of the same gender living happily and peacefully are able to provide for them, then why fight i
in 6 children will go hungry today... if those
same children can be given the chance to eat today because two people
of the
same gender living happily and peacefully are able to provide for them, then why fight it?
The distinction between persons
of a homosexual orientation and people who choose to engage
in same -
gender sexual acts comes from the growing conviction that for a percentage
of every population, homosexuality is a given, a life orientation that they did not choose.
As most
same -
gender - loving people
in fundamentalist houses
of worship, Marcus lived a double life, or on the «down low,» for he felt it was the only way to continue
in ministry and stay connected to the community he loved.
Today I woke up
in a world where I, as as man, still face a reality: the expectations
of my
gender are pretty much the
same as they have been for ages, whereas women now have greater flexibility.
I could care less if the legal union
of a
same -
gender couple is called marriage... doesn't bother me
in the slightest.
Other religions can support the religious ceremony
of marriage between a
same -
gender couple and I will certainly not stand
in the way.
There are many animal species that have a percentage
of their population that is EXCLUSIVELY attracted to the
same gender and NEVER
in their lifetime mate with the opposite
gender.
There is no other mechanism available to
same gender couples to choose one's next
of kin
in the way that the single marriage contract can do.
The
same people who think only men should be pastors, probably have other (hidden) criteria related to sexuality and
gender —
in my experience, a majority
of pastors are straight, married, cisgender men.
Throughout God and the Gay Christian we see how patriarchy and ancient understandings
of gender roles affected how
same - sex behavior is referenced
in Scripture.
The apostle Paul makes the very
same appeal to «natural» and «unnatural,»
in the context
of gender roles, when he argues that women should wear head coverings: «Judge for yourself,» he writes, «Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?
Bisexual activist Robyn Ochs has a commonly used definition saying, «I call myself bisexual because I acknowledge that I have
in myself the potential to be attracted — romantically and / or sexually — to people
of more than one sex and / or
gender, not necessarily at the
same time, not necessarily
in the
same way, and not necessarily to the
same degree.»
For ninety - nine percent
of the population who have never questioned if they are male or female because their
gender identity aligns with their biological sex, I challenge you
in the
same way Jesus challenged his disciples — try to wrap your brain around the fact that not everyone is wired as you are; you are
in the fortunate majority that somehow beat the odds
in the crap - shoot
of gender identity.
Representatives from the
same group
of privileged people who dominated conversations
in the 20th century continue to dominate the conversations about current issues such as modesty culture, immigration reform, relevancy
in culturally - diverse America,
gender issues, and more.