Sentences with phrase «of the suffering animals»

The SA Government is promising to keep watch as a live export ship loads its first shipment of sheep in the state since horrific images of suffering animals were made public, but protesters are calling for an end to the practice.

The Adoption Mission is «to improve the lives of suffering animals by practicing compassion and kindness.»

«Customer Service Excellence» is our value that ensures we understand and meet the needs of suffering animals that have been saved.

Thank you Tony for your compassion and for taking action on behalf of suffering animals everywhere!!

People who are distressed by pictures of suffering animals being rescued from horrible conditions often direct angry, derogatory...

But we look in the eyes of the suffering animals we are documenting for the advocacy work, and we promise to help them.

ARC works with communities that don't have the resources to confront the cruelty themselves, especially when large numbers of suffering animals are involved.

Best Friends magazine broke the mold of existing animal advocacy publications in the early 1990s with a principled policy of never using graphic images of suffering animals to make our readers feel pity and guilt, and now we've created the following TV spot with the hope that we can disrupt the sad - sack world of animal video appeals with something new, something positive and something entirely Best Friends.

The video, like any imagery of a suffering animal, is unbearably sad.

Not exact matches

I'm thinking for example of the little girl who reportedly suffered a dog bite on Southwest Airlines earlier this year, or the man who was viciously attacked by a dog on Delta in 2017, and the widely reported airline moves to restrict support animals from airplane cabins.

Images of violence against «real people or animals» with comments or captions that contain enjoyment of suffering, humiliation and remarks that speak positively of the violence or «indicating the poster is sharing footage for sensational viewing pleasure» are prohibited.

As one of the few remaining, functioning businesses, Smith could supply desperately needed services to his community, including care to the dozens of cats, dogs, goats, horses and other animals in the community that suffered from burns and smoke inhalation.

PETA focuses its attention on four main areas in which the largest number of animals suffer the most intensely including factory farms: the clothing trade, laboratories, and the entertainment industry.

The transformation of animal skin into leather entails the usage of 130 various chemicals, including cyanide, and workers and people living near tanneries suffer from constant exposure to these chemicals

GFI's mission of developing plant - based and cellular alternatives to animal products has the potential to reduce farmed animal suffering on a large scale.

VICTORIA — New Democrat MLA, Selina Robinson, introduced a bill that would help prevent animals from suffering or dying in vehicles during the heat of summer.

Yes it is a religion of peace, any Muslim butchering an animal would say the name of God and use a very sharp knife for that to make it quick for the animal to die with out suffering!

But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction, suffering wrong as the wage for their wrongdoing.

John You consider Jesus forcing a munch of animals to suffer a painful death just to make a point some kind of «miracle»?

A paraphilia is a disorder that is characterized by recurrent intense sexual urges and sexually arousing fantasies generally involving: nonhuman objects; the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one's partner (not merely simulated); or animals, children, or other nonconsenting persons.

And what about the suffering of animals?

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

please explain how the suffering and death of animals is important to a supreme being.

Can we avoid supporting those forms of factory farming that cause extreme suffering to animals?

No one, can preach God, as an all loving God... then also preach the suffering and slaughtering of God's animals throughout the evil bible.

These Earthists view those concerned with the suffering and death of individual animals as sentimental.

And it's hard enough to cope with human suffering without worrying about the suffering of other animals.

For the sake of slightly greater profit, we are transforming farms into factories in which many animals suffer horribly throughout their lives.

Those who have focused on reducing animal suffering are equally harsh in their judgments of those who trivialize their concerns.

Belittling of concern about animal suffering is mistaken.

But you are making the assumption that the suffering of animals matters.

I'm not saying the unnecessary suffering of animals is good, or moral, but rather pointing out that your perspective on the subject is no more rational, no more based on fact, than that of the people you are arguing against.

If, for example, our reflection on other animals takes place in the context of the conviction that Christ is in them and they are in Christ, that we and they are members one of the other, and that together we build up the body of Christ, it would no longer be possible to turn our backs upon their suffering with indifference.

When eating meat not only causes suffering to animals but also deprives the world's poor of needed food, it will certainly not be justified.

The suffering of animals is an important matter.

Indeed, they advocate treating people as no more than the sum of their carbon molecules, of no inherent value beyond cognitive capacity (bioethics) or ability to suffer (animal rights) at the moment of measurement.

It is only by our boycotting meat that animals can cease to suffer under the conditions of contemporary factory farming.

But one way or another all advocates of animal rights, process thinkers included, lament the fact that so many domesticated animals can and do suffer unnecessarily at the hands of humans.

Because animals can suffer, we have ethical obligations not to inflict upon them more pain, relative to their capacities for sentience, than we would inflict on creatures of our own kind, relative to our capacities.

«Whatever the theoretical possibilities of rearing animals without suffering may be, the fact is that the meat available from butchers and supermarkets comes from animals who did suffer while being reared» (ALNE 165).

Even granting something like the teleological order I have asserted, however, some may doubt that this formulation adequately states our responsibilities to our natural habitat, especially responsibilities to the diversity of species in the nonhuman world and to individual animals, at least within species whose members exhibit the capacity to suffer.

Whereas land ethicists are systems - oriented, animal rightists are individual - oriented; whereas land ethicists are concerned with the stability, integrity, and beauty of ecosystems, animal rightists are concerned with suffering; whereas land ethicists are concerned with the fate of flora, rivers, and mountains, animal rightists emphasize fellow fauna.

Schweitzer's interest in eliminating the unnecessary suffering of individual animals is at the heart of the animal rights movement.

But in the present situation, where the meat that comes to our table usually represents extended suffering on the part of the animal whose body we eat, we recognize that withdrawal of support from the whole system through vegetarianism is a fully appropriate, if not morally mandated, position.

In the debate between those whose concern is for the richness of the biosphere and those who focus on the relief of suffering of individual animals, we are unwilling to take sides.

Some of those who are concerned for animal suffering believe that the goal should be legislation to reduce this suffering, while still affirming the right of human beings to raise animals for slaughter.

They note that while some ecologists are focusing attention on the maintenance of wilderness, we have in fact turned our farms into factories, where meat is produced with no regard whatever for the suffering of the animals involved.

Others believe that this insensitivity to the suffering of individual animals is profoundly immoral.

If the world continues to accept disappearing tree - cover, land degradation, the expansion of deserts, the loss of plant and animal species, air and water pollution, and the changing chemistry of the atmosphere it will also have to accept economic decline and social disintegration... such disintegration would bring human suffering on a scale that has no precedent...» 7

His good creation was not intended to function this way, but since He gave humans, angels, and even animals (to a degree) the freedom to make genuine choices, we sometimes use this freedom in ways that are contrary to the will and desire of God, and when we do this, the forces of nature suffer the consequences, and chaos rages over the face of earth, wreaking havoc, destroying lives, and bringing destruction in its wake.