Jesus is experiencing something like a Gethsemane, for he knows that calling Lazarus out
of the tomb means that he must enter it.
Not exact matches
As Milosz looks at the names on the
tombs, from his own «half broken inside» he begins to establish a communion with those buried there, musing ironically on the
meanings of the names he reads: «Crazy Sophies, / Michaels who lost every battle, / Self - destructive Agathas.»
As Jesus promised, «those in the memorial
tombs will hear [Christ's] voice and come out» by
means of a resurrection.
This
means that as Jonah was in the belly
of the fish for three days, so the Messiah will be in the
tomb three days.
Even assuming that Jesus» grave was known, which is by no
means certain, it seems very possible that neither party was interested in it, or regarded the truth
of Easter as dependent on it, until long after the event: until the period
of the controversies reflected in Matthew, which would not arise until the empty
tomb had become important in Christian thought about the Resurrection.
Many others, who did grasp my
meaning, were dismayed because, while I asserted the objective reality
of God's act at Easter, I did not take the stories
of the empty
tomb as the basis
of my interpretation
of that act
of God, but, on the contrary, suggested that these stories may be unhelpful to our understanding
of the Easter message.
And trying to prove an empty
tomb means something special via unknown authors and a shoddy list
of alleged witnesses is grasping at a lot
of straw.
In this chapter we are simply showing that the use
of the term «on the third day» does not necessarily
mean that Paul was familiar with the account
of the empty
tomb, and that some scholars feel quite certain that he was not.
Thus in Mark, the visit to the
tomb is the
means by which the resurrection itself is declared, and not a prelude to, or presupposition
of, appearances
of the risen Lord to follow.
John's inclusion
of the
tomb story
meant that the exaltation
of Jesus associated with the cross was subjected to a slight delay in time.
As the Roman Catholic and Orthodox traditions have known for centuries, and many other churches have discovered too, the only way that this extraordinary narrative will yield its
meaning is quite simply if we play the events at their original speed — God's speed, not ours — living in and through the events day by day: the grieving farewells, the betrayal and denial, the shuddering fear in the garden, the stretched - out day
of torture and forsakenness, and the daybreak
of wonder, color and
tomb - bursting newborn life.
It was rather that, whether you take the empty
tomb story literally or as a mythical description
of what we
mean by the Resurrection (namely that the living presence
of the crucified Christ is present with us now), the idea is better forgotten, or rather is better not entertained at all, that the Resurrection is parallel to the raising
of Lazarus from the grave in the Fourth Gospel.
I disagree with the choice
of words here, and, perhaps, the
meaning in that Jesus» death was necessary and so was something that he chose to not resist and that, later, he left the
tomb into which his then - corpse had been interred by rolling away a rock which had served as the «door» to it, which would not require any «busting».
How much more, then, when the
means of the penetration
of man's otherwise impregnable little fortress -
tomb, the tiny, sealed capsule
of his puny life, is a Word - the Word» How totally impossible to describe the process initiated and executed from Without, by Another, himself quite unseen, or rather seen only in the limited form
of a particular function, or to explain the breaking
of the walls
of the fortress -
tomb, and the granting
of a kind
of release from the capsule!
That's good, obviously, because it
means it looks and sounds amazing and plays like a dream - plus it actually has a ton
of tombs this time around - but slightly disappointing because it is a very similar experience overall.
This measure
of last resort
meant the kingdom was saved but uninhabitable, and any veteran Zelda player would presume the endgame to involve raising it from its watery
tomb.
The Venetian painter
meant a Pietà, set against the illusion
of heavy stone, for his own
tomb.