Sentences with phrase «of the unborn child in»

«Are we acquiescing to the killing of the unborn child in our country?

Scientists in Hong Kong and the United States have mapped hundreds of thousands of DNA code variations spread across the genome of an unborn child in order to determine whether or not it would inherit a rare blood disorder.

Think twice before taking painkillers during pregnancy as researchers have found that they could affect the fertility of the unborn child in later life.

here's something perverse about an ideology that views the disposing of an unborn child in the third trimester of pregnancy as an indisputable right but the desire of parents to choose a school for their kids as zealotry.

There's something perverse about an ideology that views the disposing of an unborn child in the third trimester of pregnancy as an indisputable right but the desire of parents to choose a school for their kids as zealotry.

Not exact matches

At the time pursuing a PhD in electrical and computer engineering at U of T, Frey and his wife at the time learned that their unborn child showed signs of a serious genetic disorder.

The statement on Thursday comes amid a growing debate over the use of powerful new gene editing tools in human eggs, sperm and embryos, which have the power to change the DNA of unborn children.

Most Americans seem uncomfortable with a climate in which, as Jo McGowan puts it, «the destruction of unborn children is acceptable.»

He said that at young age he «fell in love» with an ultrasound image of his unborn child.

Tell me, little Unborn Child, what did the Creator say?Did He wrap you in His love, and wipe your tears away?You hover on the edge of time.I see your faceless form.You laugh whenever children play, Oh, God, for you I mourn!He sent His only Precious Sonto teach us all «the Way.»

By respecting equally the life of the unborn child and the life of the mother, by supporting notification and consent before an abortion involving a minor, by offering ministries to reduce unintended pregnancy, by affirming (and encouraging church support of) crisis pregnancy centers, and by urging family counsel in decision - making about abortion, the additional language is decisively pro-life.

And in such a world, an unplanned, unwanted unborn child is clearly the most annoying kind of drain on the emotional profits.

Prove to me that that unborn child should die for what we have done in the name of adultery, War, and lust..

Certainly the lives of women are as important as those of unborn children, but no one in America or abroad advocates the slaughter of thousands of women annually, while many do defend murder of the unborn.

But the great and encouraging consequence of this breakthrough is that the humanity of the unborn child, even at the earliest embryonic stage of development, is now a subject of polite conversation even in the circles that so fanatically resisted acknowledging the facts of life.

Denying the divine origins of the human person, our government has withdrawn the law's protection from unborn children in the womb» the most absolutely innocent and defenseless members of our human family.

Care's Chief Executive Nola Leach said they will, despite the new announcement, «continue to advocate for women and unborn children in Northern Ireland and across the rest of the UK.»

She added: «We recognize that there are difficulties women face with pregnancies, especially in cases where the unborn child may be born with a life - limiting disease, but we do not believe that abortion is the answer, and that funding for a free abortion in another country is short - sighted as it neglects any mention of an offer of counselling or care for the woman.»

Causing the death of an unborn child is in the Bible, for in the Bible at Exodus 21, it says that «in case men should struggle with each other and they really hurt a pregnant woman and her children do come out but no fatal accident occurs, he is to have damages imposed upon him without fail according to what the owner of the woman may lay upon him; and he must give it through the justices.

MOMOYA: To what level of self - loathing have we sunk, when we define our own young as a «parasite»?!? I have seen doting friends put pictures of a 12 week old fetus (they called it their «unborn child») in baby scrapbooks.

Even when unintentional, causing «a fatal accident» was punishable by death, showing that the life of an unborn child has as much value in God's eyes as one that has been born, being one and the same to him, for he «is the source of life.»

The media hounded Tim Farron for his Christian views; they did not regard it as acceptable for him to hold views other than those of the political elite, or the majority, Similarly, our belief in the personhood of the unborn child and the sanctity of their lives enables us to see abortion as a sin crying to heaven for justice, not merely some privately held opinion; for us it is most definitely not «a woman's choice».

And in his annual Message for the World Day of Peace on 1 January 2009, Benedict XVI noted: «The extermination of millions of unborn children, in the name of the fight against poverty, actually constitutes the destruction of the poorest of all human beings.»

= > Not true, in late term pregnancy complications TODAY, the rights of the unborn child are taken into account when evaluating the solution.

Suppose your unborn child was determined in the first trimester to be grossly malformed, unlikely to live, possibly to kill you during pregnancy; and if if it did live without killing you, to have a life of severe pain and suffering with the hope of nothing resembling, or even close to, normal life.

His defence of human life in Evangelium Vitae rallied the Church to the cause of defending the vulnerable and opposing the killing of unborn children and the frail and weak.

In the case of the unborn child, this should take account of scientific and medical fact.

If an unborn child is a human being, it doesn't belong to you, unless of course you believe in slavery.

And yet the swell of immigrants (more than twelve million illegal and eleven million legal since 1986, according to his figures) is still dwarfed by the cohort of unborn children lost to abortion in the United States (more than twenty - nine million during the same two decades).

Then five - year - old Ryland Ward was part of a Sunday morning service at First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs in which a gunman stormed in and killed 26 people, including an unborn child.

But, I just wonder when you speak of those marginalized, do you include unborn children, who have far less of a voice in politics than do the homosexual community?

Put positively, the conclusion should be that we must work toward the goal of the pro-life movement: every child, born and unborn, protected in law and welcomed in life.

Unfortunately, they don't have the sense of autonomy that would lead them to refuse sex if their own life - chances (as well as those of their as - yet - unborn children) are in danger of being damaged by male reluctance to use the simple means of contraception readily available.

Here, for instance, is Judge Richard Arnold of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals explaining why states can not ban the killing of a «living unborn child» while it is in the process of being delivered.

Taking a life, either of an unborn child or an aged person, violates a fundamental principle and will in the end be harmful to society.

Wayne C. Lusvardi is right to underscore that certain things» unborn children, for instance, or body parts, or drugs» shouldn't be subject to the logic of choice that prevails in a free market.

Our task now is to support the good in Mr. Trump's policies and to resist the bad — and thereby prove to our countrymen that the meaning of «pro-life» begins with the unborn child, but in embracing the poor, the elderly and the immigrant, it never ends there.

First, as I note at Public Discourse today in» Kermit Gosnell and the Logic of «Pro-Choice,»» the most up - to - the - minute philosophers in bioethics are dispensing with any «sharp distinction,» as Jon puts it, between the unborn child and the one who has been born.

First the «born in sin» I would suggest is a weak argument since we are talking about the unborn and also would be offensive to parents of children that died prior to birth (me being one of them).

The Journal of Medical Ethics has an entire symposium on infanticide in its latest issue, in which one can see scholars at prominent institutions reasoning (plausibly, alas) that if the unborn child can be licitly aborted, then «after - birth abortion» can be permitted as well.

If he knowingly commits a post-24 weeks abortion, based on such stringent life and health criteria, the doctor must certify his judgment about the threat in writing; acquire the concurrence of a second doctor in that judgment based on a «separate personal medical examination» of the woman; perform the abortion in a hospital; employ procedures designed to maximize the unborn child's chances to survive; and have a second physician present, ready to consider any surviving child his primary patient.

They are the truths which alone can guarantee respect for the inalienable dignity and rights of each man, woman, and child in our world ¯ including the most defenseless of all human beings, the unborn child in the mother's womb.»

The Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act provides that unless a physician can establish that he «reasonably believes» an unborn child is younger than 24 weeks, or, if the child is older, he can establish that continuing the pregnancy will result in either the death of the mother or «the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function,» the physician can not perform a late - term abortion.

Having thought carefully and well, Christians today must emulate their Lord in standing up for the frail dignity of humanity, whether the unborn child, the victim of religious persecution, or the homecoming king» the boy who in his death, as in his final touchdown run, passed alone into his rest, uncaught, with no foe left to pursue.

This summer, Americans were shocked to learn that Planned Parenthood had been engaged in activities that, whether you call it «selling» or «donating and being reimbursed for the costs of transport,» whether you call the sources «unborn children» or «fetuses,» undeniably involved exchanging organs and money.

It is clear that although Gianna will be remembered predominantly for the way in which she put the life of her unborn child before her own life, this is only one of many ways in which she witnesses to the Gospel.

Morelli decries the fact that «we live in a society where the life of the worst criminal is worth more than that of an unborn child.»

That our laws permit the killing of unborn children is already a sign of the barbarity which arises from radical individualism, albeit it dressed as virtue in the claim to be ensuring the «right to reproductive health».

Every thoughtful person has understood that the pro-life position - explicitly and consistently articulated by the Catholic Church at every level of teaching authority - is that justice requires that every unborn child be cared for andprotected in law.

We see the consequences of this quite regularly at the Cardinal Winning Pro-Life Initiative when women in crisis pregnancies weigh up the benefits of keeping their unborn child with that of holding on to a second car or a Sky box.