Sentences with phrase «of the whole thing when»

Just do me a favour and make yourself pint of the whole thing when the book launches, so you can get the full experience, k?!

I look forward to sharing a photo of the whole thing when I've got the last three pieces in place.

Not exact matches

When you work for an evolving business, then you know - coming up with a great strategy is one thing, executing it is a whole other ball of wax.

And yet Mackey, who is set to stay at the helm of Whole Foods, also remarked that his company has a thing or two to learn from Amazon, especially when it comes to putting shoppers front and center.

Still, it does have a few things going for it: The «fast delete» button lets you quickly scrap whole words at a time; there's a one - handed mode that lets you crunch the keys over to one side of the screen; and, when your phone is in landscape mode, it splits apart like an ergonomic keyboard, making it feel a little more natural for your thumbs.

Things have indeed changed since the time when Otto von Bismark, the chancellor of the German First Reich, arrogantly opined that «the whole of the Balkans is not worth the bones of a single Pomeranian grenadier.»

Multitasking in the morning — when you have lots to do, tons of energy, and it feels like you can do two or three things at once — is tempting, but it sets your whole day back.

Just when economic bullying by big corporations threatened the whole idea of independent small business, company builders nationwide did the last thing anyone expected — they turned to one another for help.

That whole «rechargeable» thing goes out the window when you're out of electricity, however, so it helps to keep a reserve of standard alkaline batteries on hand.

Perhaps that's extreme, but one sign the whole thing did have an impact on agency profits and revenues, at least when it comes to the stock prices of the four biggest holding companies.

Go watch Mulcair's Economic Club of Canada speech where that's the first thing he brings up when discussing this issue (the portion covering this issue starts around 8:30, but the whole thing is worth watching).

And the answer to that rhetorical question, of course, is that nonbank companies generally don't get bailed out when the whole thing blows up.

The whole thing turned into a particularly ugly social - media mess for Nestle when the manager of the company's fan page on Facebook started getting argumentative and rude.

«A fee - based annuity fits best in a client's portfolio when it is a piece of what the advisor is managing, not the whole thing,» said Tony Compton, vice president of broker / dealer and RIA sales for Great American Insurance Group in Cincinnati.

I don't really like this whole «I'm worthless and sinfull and only when I allow God to work me like a puppet can I do good things» version of Christianity.

And when I finally got a pocketknife, the first thing I set out to do was whittle a whole army of disciples carved out of soap.

if you want to truly educate yourself on the origins of your beliefs, research scholars that have studied it their whole careers, not some preacher that can be fired when he saids things you don't like... trust me i have watched that happen.

But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said; with my heart I want to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars against our flesh, even as Christ wars against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria

All I'm trying to say here is that when I'm told to love God with my whole heart, soul and mind, and to love my neighbor as myself, and to forgive others unconditionally, and to love my wife unconditionally, and to be kind and compassionate to others and to love my en emies and to take care of orphans and to feed the hungry and not to li e or to e nvy or be boastful or arro gant or hypoc ritical or a gossip or proud, and when I'm told that God demonstrated his love for us in that while we were still in s in, Christ di ed for us, I realize that these things have no relevance to the grie vances I find in» religion.»

1) When I was digging into this whole thing 4 or 5 years ago I ended up coming across a copy of the email you sent to a few dozen emergent leaders back in July of 2008 asking for their help in getting Tony home from the Rolling Roadshow.

We always make a secret comparison between a part and the whole; the termination of any period of life reminds us that life itself has likewise its termination; when we have done any thing for the last time, we involuntarily reflect that a part of the days allotted us is past, and that as more is past there is less remaining.

When a man dies that whole thing dies; that is to say, that subsistent thing, made up of body and soul, perishes as the soul is separated from the body.

The message of the Bible is only clear when you read the whole thing.

So when Whitehead says it «lies in the nature of things that the many enter into complex unity» (Process 21), he should be referring first of all to (1) transition — the way the incipient whole overlaps the many of the preceding world so they «become» objects or parts of its process.

When the last things refer to the life of the world or history as a whole, they customarily include the second coming of Jesus, the resurrection of the dead, general judgment (eliminating an interim state and resulting in heaven or hell), and the consummation of the world.

In our individual experience, it seems that when a few things fall apart, the whole apparatus of life threatens to collapse.

When particular elements in the traditional teaching about the nature of things have been challenged by demonstrable scientific findings, the whole structure of religious dogma has been called into question.

When you look at the whole Mouse Trap game, you can see all of the little things that need to be set up to get to the goal of catching the mouse.

When we read Aeterni Patris as a whole, we see that Leo framed the revival of Christian philosophy chiefly in the context of the ongoing political problems: «False conclusions concerning divine and human things, which originated in the schools of philosophy, have now crept into all the orders of the State.»

This mutual relevance, or coherence, of the two principles is particularly evident when Whitehead says: «The oneness of the universe, and the oneness of each element in the universe, repeat themselves to the crack of doom in the creative advance from creature to creature, each creature including in itself the whole of history and exemplifying the self - identity of things and of their mutual diversities» (PR 347f).

«Say what you will about God, there is not a shovel big enough to dig yourself out of the whole that you dug for yourself when you said: «Not a single thing in the entire universe can claim eternal life» In that one statement, you are admitting that the universe is not eternal.

In America many Christians who insist on a literal interpretation of anything in the Bible are often ready to say «but, in this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!»

All living with the whole being and with unconstrained force means danger; there is no thing, relation, or event in the world that does not reveal an abyss when it is known, and all thinking threatens to shatter the stability of the thinker.

No one wants to take the whole thing down but to say some type of redistribution isn't necessary when you have a system that allows that type of greed to exist seems disingenuous at best,.

You realize 10 tribes of Israel are scattered through all the earth which makes every one of us Israeli just cause we live in America in 2018 does nt mean it's not true Lucifer would like us to believe we are different nation's never Israeli he wins when you don't look at things as a whole cause then your only getting part of the picture.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

It was no such thing and it changes history to allow this false message when the whole building, like most structures, was made up of cross bars.

I know (all too well) the vigorous (sometimes vicious) arguments that weave a complex scaffold of doctrine and interpretation in which anything other than a literal reading brings the whole thing crashing down, like a teetering Jenga tower when one slim block is moved.

When I read the whole thing, I thought it may help someone who thinks God is just too mean to be a God of love.

When he pursues or embraces the phenomenal aspect of what he desires, he at least seeks some kind of communion with the thing in itself, some capture of the whole nuptial totality of form and matter.

From personal experience i was in a church who has the whole congregation pray for 1/2 hour in tongues.The people in this church were leaders from Africa.A place who sees more supernatural then us because we feel the need to analyze the thing to death.When we did the atmosphere shifted lives were changed.When i was on a mission trip to Mexico i felt lead to go pray with the women who in that culture are outcasts one of ladies who came with me started singing in the spirit as i was we stopped each other in shock when we realized we were sing the same song the needs of the women were met with out an interrupter.

The whole thing rests upon one author — Michael Prescott's — highly selective excerpting and chopping up of a private [i.e., thinking out loud without clarifications] journal written when Rand was barely out of her teens, fresh from the blood bath of 1920s Soviet Russia — and still made it very clear that her read on the personalities of the observers showed that they were not appalled by Hickman's crime — she said there had been far worse, without the same spectacle of glee — but by his flamboyant and mocking defiance of society.

But the remorseless working of things when all follow this individualistically rational solution finally creates disaster for the whole community.

The answer is, that when things are separately and specifically noticed in acts which, though distinct, are unified and ordered by a characteristic enumerative interest or purpose, the primary contents (sensa) corresponding to the things are caught up in the overarching act to form a whole representation (in the sense of an intentional object) on the basis of which an objective, real, multiplicity intuitively appears.

To gerald, you are right, this is not proof that god does not exist, its just proof that people who associate and live their life around a fake «thing» tend to believe that other things are fake (law) when in fact their whole life and thier meaning of life (god) is fake.

Here's a storyabout a local farm that was hosting a «farm to fork» dinner when a state health inspector came by and shut the whole thing down for a series of ridiculous reasons.

Just when you think things are all set, something changes — a baby is born, a youth leaves the nest, a husband retires — and a whole new set of problems sits like a mountain on what was your smooth marital road.

Thus, when Paul found himself in prison, his mind turned not to queries concerning the justice of his being there, but to the uses to which his imprisonment could be positively put: «Now I would have you know, brethren, that the things which happened unto me have fallen out rather unto the progress of the gospel; so that my bonds became manifest in Christ throughout the whole pretorian guard, and to all the rest; and that most of the brethren in the Lord, being confident through my bonds, are more abundantly bold to speak the word of God without fear.»

When the writings of Wallis and other evangelicals long associated with the Christian left (yes, there was an organization called «Evangelicals for McGovern») are offered up as a «radical biblical way that transcends the highly politicized agendas» of the Christian right and the PC left, one can't help but think that the whole thing is more than a little disingenuous.

When this type of reasoning is applied to a sacred text, one is placed in the awkward position of either affirming the whole thing or selectively denying it on very tenuous grounds, such as one's present world view.