A «legal separation» is offered in some states to couples who want to separate permanently but can not divorce, either because
of their personal beliefs like religion or complications such as shared health insurance.
Not exact matches
Kevin your right
personal beliefs and or religion does not belong in law, and I am not saying that what this atheist organization is doing is wrong or anything, I think what there doing is a good thing, I just think this particular message could have been done from a different perspective, this message makes them appear
like the self righteous ones, and it might give out the wrong kind
of message, instead it should have said something
like you believe in god fine, but don't put it in our laws.
Until the current deity
of choice (The God
of Abraham) actually shows himself, I for one will not accept the talking snakes, virgin births, and condemnation
of personal freedoms that surround the
belief in him —
like stoning someone for working on the sabbath, or killing children who curse their parents, or the rules
of owning slaves, all concepts clearly stated in the Old Testament.
I mention, only because my... paradigm (I'm not much on
beliefs, in the usual organized religion sense)... includes a «Divine»
of my own definition, that equates to something
like «awe
of life, love, and knowing that there is much we don't know» (< — sorry, not the easiest thing for me to get into words, hopefully that gets the gist
of it) that I don't see as a «
personal other», but, in my paradigm, I see that Divine as being systemic to everything, hence insights from what I learn / experience can be termed as the Divine acting.
@Scott, I'll be happy to go into a long conversation about the various intricacies
of my
personal beliefs if you'd
like and we can debate the value
of divine plans: but for now I just want to say thank you.
I came to the
personal beliefs I hold
like may
of you atheists did.
Well I
like the old fashioned method
of respecting someone based on their actions and deeds, not
personal beliefs that comes out
of their mouths... Cathy is a businessman, a 1 % er if you will, who is not a preacher.
Regardless
of our
personal beliefs about god and divinity, if these actions bring comfort to people at times
like these then such actions are not wrong.
This stretch is bad enough but what's worse is how Prothero's disdain for Santorum manifests itself repeatedly throughout the piece in a petty ad hominem
like «Saint Santorum» and resurrecting the deliberating misleading conflation
of Santorum's
personal beliefs about birth control with his public policy stance.
If you had your preacher here to tell you the meaning
of the words I wrote, you would understand my words to have meant that anytime anything mentions atheism it sends the christians into a tizzy,
like its an assault on their
personal beliefs, Atheists have know for ever that there are christians around.
My
personal belief, & I have came to this as
of late, watching ladies
like Billy Graham's daughter (who, by the way, also in my own
personal opinion, preaches better than most «called» men)... is this....
Like Thomas Jefferson, who famously called for a «wall
of separation between church and state,» Holmes believed that
personal beliefs had no place in judicial decisions.
Heavily influenced by the Enlightenment and the philosophical tradition
of Logical Positivism (the idea that if something is not able to be judged true or false, then we are rationally compelled to ignore it as irrelevant), much
of the modern Church has bought into the
belief that the truth
of Christianity should be treated
like any other set
of factual claims, and that people
of faith can somehow rationally observe ultimate truth with a level
of personal detachment and objectivity.
Secular organizations do have much to learn from men
like Rivers and Madison about how
personal, intense interaction based on core
beliefs changes lives, especially the lives
of at - risk children.
The
likes of Bellerin are far from the norm, may be they need to be loaned out to see if they get better as just being a sub and training will not make them play with a
personal belief, wow that's Wengers saying and it's true.
Following the example
of counter-protesters who took action in the face
of hate (including a great many educators), we are steadfast in our
belief that we must be even more committed to owning our
personal responsibility to dismantle white supremacy in our institutions - be they nonprofits
like Leading Educators or the school districts from which our students and families rightfully expect excellent, bias - free education.
They've heard from readers — or in some cases, even agents and editors — who don't believe the character's situation because
of their
personal beliefs about what a black, gay, autistic, etc. experience would be
like.
We see licensed books bringing in a lot
of new readers, and seeing something
like SPX, which just had a gangbusters show, devoted to small press, people were there to buy, so there is a lot
of interest in stuff that is an expression
of a creator's
personal storytelling... Our
belief is where there is creativity, readers will follow, and it seems to us there is a great flowering
of creativity, so it's a great time to be in the comics world.»
He also echoes a
personal belief of mine as to why the PSP doesn't look
like it's doing as well as it really is, «It's funny... I guess the PSP has also been a bit in the shadow
of the DS, but the PSP is incredibly successful... but I guess that the DS has been a super-amazing platform.»
If a political body (
like the U.N.), however, assembles a group
of scientists to manufacture the impression
of a strong consensus in order to further their
personal beliefs and preferred policy changes... then, I think, we might end up in dangerous waters.
Churches are groups
of like minded persons organized for the purpose
of mutual support while the members seek Person Spiritual Experiences (PRE), which will then form the basis
of their
Personal Religious
Beliefs.
Denialism gives you victim / threatened status (those evildoers are attacking our
beliefs, we need to be warriors), enough victories to think
of oneself as a winner but maintain the communal aspects
of thinking oneself under threat, charismatic leaders, the companionship
of shared
beliefs, a sense
of superiority to those who disbelieve, and, in the most cult -
like aspect, the assurance
of being above mere facts,
of living in a world where your
personal beliefs trump mere objective facts.
I can't see the legal underpinnings, and the phrasing makes it seem
like what is wanted is a compelled
personal statement
of belief, even if I don't think that's what the Law Society likely intended.
«This is not a
personal belief that «I don't
like abortion,»» says Elliot Mincberg
of People For the American Way, which is vigorously fighting the Alito nomination.
CA has been called out for borderline ethical use
of personal Facebook data, such as covertly gathering «
likes» to predict the attitudes and
beliefs that Facebook users might share unknowingly.
It requires explicit opt - ins for the usage
of sensitive
personal information, such as ethnicity,
beliefs, sexual orientation, and
like information.
For this reason, dodge the temptation to provide links on your resume to a
personal blog or social media pages (with the exception
of LinkedIn), or to offer
personal details
like your race, gender preferences, political leanings, or religious
beliefs.
Many popular social media websites
like Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, Facebook, and the
like allow users to provide a great deal
of detail regarding their
personal background and lifestyle, including their relationship status, affiliation or prior service with a branch
of the military, religious
beliefs, physical disabilities, and often, current employer (or status as unemployed).
Individual therapy (sometimes called «psychotherapy» or «counseling») is a process through which clients work one - on - one with a trained therapist — in a safe, caring, and confidential environment — to explore their feelings,
beliefs, or behaviors, work through challenging or influential memories, identify aspects
of their lives that they would
like to change, better understand themselves and others, set
personal goals, and work toward desired change.
Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all
of the following are true for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution
of the issues, (b) you would
like to keep open the possibility
of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have ethical or spiritual
beliefs that place high value on taking
personal responsibility for handling conflicts with integrity, (f) you value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and often unpredictable range
of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available in the public court system and want a more creative and individualized range
of choices available to you and your spouse or partner for resolving the issues.
You'd agree on everything about parenting, because you'd be so similar in the first place, and in all
of your years on earth, the two
of you would have independently developed the exact same
likes and dislikes, the same ideals, the same set
of personal beliefs and the same goals for your futures.