Not exact matches
So unlike brokers, we have no conflict
of interest pushing us to recommend high volumes
of trades whether we believe in the
potential of those trades or not We have no perpetual
bias for a bull market as most
of Wall Street has to be (to justify the heavily - weighted stance
of «buy» vs. «sell,» a stance that always persists even in harshest bear markets) Instead
of all
of these kinds
of anti-investor establishment motivators, we will sell our products on subscription, with a customer - friendly, overwhelming motivation to deliver an experience that will win very profitable renewals for many years to come.
And I sell a plant - based protein powder
of my own,
so this opens the door for some
potential bias.
On that front the Survation poll is pretty positive about Jeremy Corbyn with people saying he came across as more trustworthy and in touch than his rivals (though such polls are always a bit tricky because
of the choice
of clips — Survation tried to iron out any
potential biasing effect by having clips from each candidate being interviewed on the Marr show,
so they were all interviews, all the same setting and same interviewer... but even then you ended up with two candidates defending their position on the welfare bill, one talking about the EU referendum and one talking about rail nationalisation.
The vegetarian community is quick to dismiss saturated fat data due when there is
potential dairy industry
bias,
so their embrace
of this study, though not unexpected, is rather hypocritical.
Thus, it is critical for educators to identify any discrepancies that may exist between their conscious ideals and unconscious associations
so that they can mitigate the effects
of those implicit
biases, thereby improving student outcomes and allowing students to reach their full
potential.
So insulting a
potential buyer
of the Kindle 4 was your goal with this uber -
biased review right?
it's a great device with even greater
potential, i won't allow
bias comments to deter my continual interest in it,
so troll away with your ipads, steve could sell most
of you «I - poop» and you'll still buy it.
Please keep all
of this in mind while reading the review,
so that you can be better informed on my
potential biases and shortcomings.
I'm a communicator and an educator,
so I'm
biased — but I think there's a lot
of potential in that arena for innovation, as well.
If
so, why, when it seems that much
of his point is that it is important to consider the
potential for
biases (such as confirmation
bias) to influence how people perform and perceive analyses?
But if he does
so, he must keep in mind the
potential bias of E and try to use his objective judgement.
The scenario encapsulates
so much BS from assumptions, ignorance
of observational trends, rational action on big and apparent dangers, and then there is the data sets, the models, the
potential for
bias, did I mention the assumptions.
«Despite the wealth
of metadata that is now available, it is not possible to estimate the
biases in an exact manner
so an attempt has been made to assess the
potential uncertainties in the
biases that arise from assumptions made in the process
of aggregating the information.
When balanced against the prejudicial effect
of allowing evidence
of professional liability insurance, the
potential for
bias in this case is
so remote as to warrant exclusion.
So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123],
of information about the following kinds
of potentials for
bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds
of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements
of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care
of and spending time with children, within and without the scope
of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all
of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles
of their innate
potential.