Sentences with phrase «of this thread because»

You should trust me because I predicted the future of this thread because of vision I had this morning.

I haven't read the rest of this thread because it's so stupid, so I'll just assume that everyone else is explaining why it's wrong.

As she once said: I liked the idea of representing women through the medium of thread because it is so identified with femininity.

«I liked the idea of representing women through the medium of thread because it is so identified with femininity,» she once said.

I've held off for the longish duration of this thread because the following comment will be disregarded as negative (that most PC of crimes)

Not exact matches

Because threaded comments will typically increase the number of comments you receive per post by 16 % to 33 %.

Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site: «My guess is that Shiller's rationalization is that he can do more good saying things the way he does because at least he gets the message out» What good is getting a message out if it's the wrong message?

Hugh Gillis, in the thread, was uncomfortable with being called a Kojevian, because that would imply he agrees with everything Alexandre said (and that, of course, would be impossible).

You can't get on one of these comment boards and have an intelligent conversation, because there is always some crazy that gets on and hijacks nearly each and every comment thread to force feed us their propagandist view.

I want you to know none of this was sarcastic, I'm very curious as to your toughts on this particular matter, because maybe, being as against the original post of this thread as you were, YOU could be the one making a slight shift in your perspective when all's said and done.

To The CNN Moderators, why did you delete the thread where «justice for all» was advocating the killing of gays because the bible says that's what they deserve?

wrt other significant blogs picking this up and discussing it, I know of a few who have not posted specifically because they didn't want to draw the conversation away from this thread.

This kind of thread is important because it is freeing, it shines light, it makes that which is already public (court cases, conferences, etc.) into a really open discussion that really does matter.

Not to hide Tony's deeds, or to protect the Emergent Leaders, because simply in many ways this thread has started the seeds of the very abuse that it claims to oppose.

Many of them are being unfairly lumped together with Tony because of the Groupthink presented on this thread.

• There is much misinformation on this thread: o The emergent movement is not a cult o emergent started as a conversation among people of various theological / philosophical understandings and remains that way o The emergent conversation hasn't faded away at all — in fact — it's now integrated in practically every Christian expression o Mars Hill and emergent have very little in common o Mark Driscoll and Tony Jones have very little in common o I don't know of the personal behavior of everyone involved in the conversation, but because people have been involved — I'm sure there has to be bad behavior from some.

So, as you can see, you're question is flawed because you are as.suming the atheist comes to this site to jeer and name call when you are only highlighting and asking a specific type of atheist that is neither the dominant form nor the type of atheist you generally get into threads with.

Focussing of attention is possible because the dominant occasion is able to stage its own contrasts among other threads of inheritance.

Shalom Gerhard, I responded to this thread because of what I read, but it appears you did not read what I wrote as you failed to respond to the PROPER translation of Luke 24:21, and also explain how the ingredients were bought AFTER the Sabbath was past as Mark states, and prepared BEFORE the Sabbath started as Luke states.

I'm going to close the thread simply because there are too many comments to monitor carefully, especially as I'm travelling over the next couple of days.

Before closing the last thread on bashing Calvinism, I noted this as one of the comments: If it is contended that people go to Hell because God elects them to Hell, then I absolutely believe that Calvinism is antithetical to Scripture because the Bible tells that God wants all to be saved, that Jesus....

What escapes Mollenkott is the fact that the hermeneutical principle she enunciates does not suggest dismissing a passage because of «the hardness of our hearts,» but rather reevaluating it with fresh, exacting, detailed research seeking a thread by which the «book hangs together.»

I will conclude with this: it is precisely because of these threads of research and analysis, which tediously take up my time for no purpose, only to reveal how unreliable Murdock is,

I can not recommend strongly enough that you take The Book of Confessions and read it through — maybe not all at one sitting, but not too many either, because you lose the threads.

I'm going to make this my last comment on this thread, not because talking about this in the way this conversation has gone is upsetting for me but I just don't see the point of talking any more with the way it has gone.

Israel demanded a king like all the other nations (etc.) Since this thread is about «reading between the lines» I suggested the story of A&S because I read Peter's will at work in this instance, not the Holy Spirit.

But that's just it... I think that they were disappointed much the same would be for a kid who didn't get to go on the roller coaster because the ride shut down due to the pending thread of a lightning storm... «They didn't get what they wanted»...

That's the case for a black lab named Lulu anyway, who was recruited into one of the toughest jobs in the dog industry and, as fate would have it, was given an early retirement because her interests lie in other areas, as the CIA explained in a Twitter thread.

UPDATE # 2: I'm going to go ahead and close the comment thread on this post because a few folks seem rather eager to prove my point there, and I'm tired of reading and deleting this stuff.

that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000 comments on this thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or other similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....

I used to sigh a bit about all this because it takes more work to pull threads together to make yard than it would be if you simply started with a full piece of fabric with which to create something else.

«The school garden program is probably the most exciting part of curriculum development for the future because the skills are simple and they build a real community thread within a school,» he says.

And the chicken skewers — threaded with every part from the knee to the neck to, yes, the butt — are grilled over two types of charcoal because, well, that is the kind of detail that Rintaro is built on.

At the end of the day it's on Pace but (I've said this repeatedly in other threads) a HUGE reason why they were bad is because our offensive play calling was so bad.

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

I don»; t know whether you saw the thread yesterday when a supporter since 1952, name of KEN, said I was not a real fan because I wanted Wenger out which needless to say he worshipped Wenger «and all he had done for us».

Because of this jerk, I'm planning to look away from the Draft thread until the picks are announced on TV.

Someone a couple threads back was incredulously asking why anyone could think he's innocent «because he was picked up by the police», and that should be proof enough of his guilt.

I always had doubts ever since when we signed him from Real Madrid because I've watched his games before and I remember thinking he's not the type to dominate the midfield and we alsoalhave do not have the type of players for him to thread passes through such as Ronaldo, Bale or Benzema.

Then, about 2/3 of the way through, someone posted that if anyone from Bucs Dugout was reading that thread, they would be laughing their ass off (for the record, I was, because they're ridiculous babies over there).

Resume: Always threads the needle in hindsight and is never wrong because, unlike like the rest of «yhall», I'm too smart to provide any foresight.

The reason why Spurs dominated us in terms of possession and control of midfield is because our keeper Ospina kick everyball long handling easy possession to Spurs and our front three gave Spurs too much room to play from the back, their defence was allowed to thread ball through us straight to thier midfield.

I see the next thread and despair (Can we win the Pl this season etc) because in my mind it is pretty obvious we are not likely to for obvious reasons, the relative strength of MC and CFC.

For example, on other current threads, STSers have (without evidence) posed the theory that Dabo didn't announce that HJ or TL is the lead dog coming out of spring camp because Dabo wants to keep all of the QBs working hard and keep them on board past the point where they could transfer for 2018.

sorry guys I have to say thus on this thread because of the respect I have for his playing ability not his personal life I must confessed....

So, you jaded men on this thread, not all middle - age women are cynics, and damaged and, I can't speak for others, but I need you around for the laughs, the adventures and, simply, because we are all in this strange and wonderful battleground of life together.

I think Greg did a wonderful, open - minded, genuine thing and I respect the hell out of the fact that he kept coming back to this blog, updating people as to the progress of the event, taking questions to pass along, being open to having information about Nestle's actions provided to him in order to educate him because he was open to being educated, and even taking more than his share of condescension directly or indirectly from people on the previous thread about things as irrelevant as his sense of humour.

Because this beginner's sewing machine doesn't require a pressed foot pedal, a wound bobbin or a threaded needle, it also doesn't require all of the headaches — and hours spent decoding the instruction manual — that often accompany those aspects of a regular sewing machine.

But I do not thread IV's into tiny scalp veins just for kicks, suction breathing tubes just because, poke heals for fun, place lines and tubes in every orifice just because I can, give endless amounts of morphine just so I don't have to deal with the baby being awake.

Back during Adoption School, when being a mom was just a theoretical concept (by the way, our agency was nothing like what's been described in this thread — it told us the benefits of open adoption to the child and said we would eventually form our own relationships with first parents, which it then left us to do), I did not embrace OA because the highly - paid social workers said it was proving to be better for the child than shame and secrecy.