Sentences with phrase «of trade mark applications»

We've been gathering data for our very own inhouse database of trade mark applications filed with Russian Patent Office, and while doing manual double checking of all entries for consistency, I've been making notes of trade marks which catched my attention — these being mostly by foreign applicants and attempts to infringe on well known -LSB-...]

The searching and clearance of new trade marks, the filing and prosecution of trade mark applications both in the UK and overseas

Not exact matches

The finding of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that the registration by plaintiff's predecessor of the trade - mark had been fraudulently obtained, was based on the fact that in the application for registration, it was stated that applicant's use of the name «Tabasco» had been exclusive, whereas the testimony showed that several other manufacturers, during the preceding ten years, had, to its knowledge, used the word in connection with pepper sauce.

The trade - mark had been cancelled, first, on the ground that it could not be denominated a technical trade - mark, because it was a geographical name, and, second, on the ground that it was fraudulently obtained, the application falsely stating it had been «in the actual and exclusive use of defendants since 1868.»

The Application, Services and Content are copyrighted works of Showtime Networks and may contain trademarks, service marks, trade names, and other intellectual property of Showtime Networks.

The Terms do not grant the User any right, title, interest, license (express or implied) to the App, any patent, trademark, service mark, copyright, trade secret or proprietary right associated with, on the part of Auto & General, the Service, or, previous applications or business methods of Auto & General (or its affiliates) required or provided in connection with the Service (whether owned or licensed by Auto & General or its affiliates or a third party); or arising from Auto & General or its affiliates» research and development activities.

If we had not opposed Banner Saga's trade mark application, it would be much easier for real copy cats to argue that their use of «Saga» was legitimate.

We deal with the filing of PCT National Phase patent applications, litigious matters involving patent, trade mark, design and copyright infringement, as well as drafting and prosecuting patents for our local clients.

The application to register the trade mark has apparently been in the court arena for the past 10 years, and following the recent decision of the OHIM, the author's estate has issued a fresh application, which now includes a sound file.

The application which was made by the author's estate in respect of the trade mark registration described the yell as «consisting of five distinct phases, namely sustain, followed by ululation, followed by sustain, but at a higher frequency, followed by ululation, followed by sustain and the starting frequency».

An application made by the literary estate of Tarzan author, Edgar Rice Burroughs, to register the famous Tarzan yell as a trade mark has recently been rejected by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(Otrade mark has recently been rejected by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OTrade Marks and Designs)(OHIM).

The above mentioned application has been examined under the provisions of Trade Mark Act, 1999 and Trade Mark Rules, 2002 and the trade mark applied for is open to objection under the following sectTrade Mark Act, 1999 and Trade Mark Rules, 2002 and the trade mark applied for is open to objection under the following sectiMark Act, 1999 and Trade Mark Rules, 2002 and the trade mark applied for is open to objection under the following sectTrade Mark Rules, 2002 and the trade mark applied for is open to objection under the following sectiMark Rules, 2002 and the trade mark applied for is open to objection under the following secttrade mark applied for is open to objection under the following sectimark applied for is open to objection under the following sections:

In the US, specimens of use must be filed when registering and renewing a trade - mark application.

Under the Convention, if a Canadian applicant files its trade - mark application in the US within six (6) months of the Canadian application's filing date, the filing date of the US application is deemed to be the same as the Canadian's application's filing date.

US trade - mark applications can be filed claiming wares and / or services on one or more of: (a) intent to use the mark (ITU); (b) prior use of the mark in the US; or (c) an existing foreign registration.

Existing EUTM registrations being entered onto the UK trade mark register (with the same registration date and, where applicable, priority and seniority) by way of a simple application by the owner.

The government of Monaco has been left rueing its own success, after the European Union's General Court refused its application to trade mark «MONACO...

Specifically, the firm took issue with Trade Mark Direct's website claiming that it was the «UK's No. 1 Trade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 yTrade Mark Direct's website claiming that it was the «UK's No. 1 Trade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 yeMark Direct's website claiming that it was the «UK's No. 1 Trade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 yTrade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 yeMark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 ytrade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 yemark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 ytrade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 yemark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 years.

We provide and implement strategic advice on a wide range of IP issues, and file more than 5,750 UK, European and international patent and trade mark applications each year; in 2016 we filed the joint highest number of European Patent applications among all European Patent Attorney firms.

Victor's areas of practice include patent drafting and prosecution, franchising, trade - mark, trade secret, patent and copyright licensing and litigation, prosecuting trade - mark, copyright and industrial design applications and trade - mark opposition proceedings.

äó cents Assistance with the preparation and drafting of trade - mark applications for the title of the project Instead of paying for legal fees on a project basis.

Vicki advises on a broad range of contentious and non-contentious IP / IT matters including trade mark applications, designs, trade mark and copyright infringement and contractual issues.

While sifting through latest trade mark applications filed in Russia (watching for particular trademark being filed — cause Russian Trademark squatters keep generating profit at the expense of multinationals) I usually make notes of what is being registered.

The team's client base includes a mix of software, electronics, retail and pharmaceutical companies; recent work includes representing Groth & Co in negotiations with owners of similar trade marks, and acting for an individual entrepreneur in a registration application before the Russian Patent & Trademark Office.

Our large, well - established team of trade mark experts helps our retail clients to secure trade mark protection by filing and prosecuting UK applications, European Union Trade Mark applications, covering the EU, and Madrid Protocol applications, for international protectrade mark experts helps our retail clients to secure trade mark protection by filing and prosecuting UK applications, European Union Trade Mark applications, covering the EU, and Madrid Protocol applications, for international protectmark experts helps our retail clients to secure trade mark protection by filing and prosecuting UK applications, European Union Trade Mark applications, covering the EU, and Madrid Protocol applications, for international protectrade mark protection by filing and prosecuting UK applications, European Union Trade Mark applications, covering the EU, and Madrid Protocol applications, for international protectmark protection by filing and prosecuting UK applications, European Union Trade Mark applications, covering the EU, and Madrid Protocol applications, for international protecTrade Mark applications, covering the EU, and Madrid Protocol applications, for international protectMark applications, covering the EU, and Madrid Protocol applications, for international protection.

Previously, the CIPO refused applications for the registration of sound marks on the basis that s. 30 (h) of the Trademarks Act requires that «unless the application is for a word or words not depicted in a special form, a drawing of the trade - mark and such number of accurate representations of the trade - mark as may be prescribed.»

A search of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office Trade - Mark database reveals that WOW, alone and in phrases, shows up in 180 applications, variously approved, expunged, abandoned etc..

Clearly there will be downsides to the procedural changes: - UK trade mark applications will now be able to proceed to full registration without having first to overcome latent threats to their validity, introducing the potential for increased disputes over the validity of registered marks, with associated costs implications.

In February 2006, the Patent Office — re-branded as the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK - IPO) after the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property — began a consultation process to assess whether the practice of examining new trade mark applications for conflict with earlier and similar registered marks should continue (see Relative Grounds for Refusal — The Way Forward).

A regulatory impact assessment prepared on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry in May 2007 did, that around 15 % of new trade mark applications fail because of prior marks, equating to at least # 900,000 in lost Trade and Industry in May 2007 did, that around 15 % of new trade mark applications fail because of prior marks, equating to at least # 900,000 in lost trade mark applications fail because of prior marks, equating to at least # 900,000 in lost fees.

This means that an application will fail at the first hurdle due to an inherent lack of distinctiveness, or else from the deficiency of another of the exacting requirements which must be met for a mark to qualify for registered protection under the Trade Marks Act 1994.

The new examination procedure will also give trade mark applicants the opportunity to decide whether or not to proceed with their application in the face of potential opposition at the publication stage, amend the existing specification to avoid a conflict, or else withdraw it altogether.

The refusal of an application on what are known as the relative grounds following scrutiny by a Trade Marks Registry examiner, is a feature of the existing statutory framework that intellectual property (IP) practitioners across the UK have come to know intimately.

What it will do is notify them if the owner of a new, potentially conflicting application has chosen to proceed to the next stage of the registration process, ie the three - month publication of the mark in the online Trade Marks Journal.

For the purposes of this Agreement, «Intellectual Property Rights» means all patent rights, copyright rights, mask work rights, moral rights, rights of publicity, trademark, trade dress and service mark rights, goodwill, trade secret rights and other intellectual property rights as may now exist or hereafter come into existence, and all applications therefore and registrations, renewals and extensions thereof, under the laws of any state, country, territory or other jurisdiction.

An intellectual property strategy unveiled in Canada includes a provision aimed at preventing the rise of trade mark trolls, in response to soaring all - class applications

All present and future rights in and to trade secrets, patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, know - how, and other proprietary rights of any type under the laws of any governmental authority, domestic or foreign, including without limitation rights in and to all applications and registrations relating to the Services shall, as between you and How - To Geek, at all times be and remain the sole and exclusive property of How - To Geek.