Sentences with phrase «of trade mark owners»

She is currently the Vice President of The Hong Kong Institute of Trade Marks Practitioners - a body with the aims of representing and encouraging cooperation between trade mark professionals in Hong Kong, and protecting the interests of trade mark owners.

WIPO notes that the evolving domain name registration system is affecting the rights of trade mark owners.

This serves to strike the delicate balance between the interests of the public and the right of the trade mark owner to exclusively use the registered trade mark.

However, the ECJ stated that the licence agreement does not necessarily constitute the absolute and unconditional consent of the trade mark owner to the licensee putting the goods bearing the trade mark on the market.

The ECJ summarised by ruling that, where a licensee puts luxury goods on the market in contravention of a provision in a licence agreement but must nevertheless be considered to have done so with the consent of the trade mark owner, the proprietor of the trade mark can rely on such a provision to oppose a resale of those goods on the basis of Art 7 (2) of the Trade Marks Directive only if it can be established that, taking into account the particular circumstances of the case, such resale damages the reputation of the trade mark.

Not exact matches

THE movement against cybersquatting, the use of trade marked names for websites which are not held by the owner, is gaining momentum.

You agree not to display or use trademarks, product names, company names, logos, service marks and / or trade dress of other owners without the prior written permission of such owners.

All other trade - marks, service marks or registered trade - marks are the property of their respective owners.

All other trademarks, product names, company names, logos, service marks and / or trade dress mentioned, displayed, cited or otherwise indicated on this website are the property of their respective owners.

All product and service marks are the trade marks of their respective owners.

Other names and logos appearing on or in connection with the Website may be registered or unregistered trademarks, official marks, service marks, trade names and logos of their respective owners.

All other trademarks, service marks and trade names used on the Site are the property of their respective owners, and all of the above trademarks may not be copied, downloaded or otherwise exploited without the permission of RMG or the owner of such trademark, service mark or trade name, except as explicitly permitted in these Terms of Use.

CEO and owner Mark Lansley will be speaking at IBWSS UK conference, while Master of Wine Dr. Arabella Woodrow and other members of the Broadland's team will be available to discuss how companies in the UK On Trade and Off Trade can take advantage of bulk wine to grow sales, profitability, and the value for money offered to consumers through the UK packed exclusive labels.

Other product and company names may be trade or service marks of their respective owners.

One of the objects of the Trade Marks Bill, now wending its way through Parliament, is to make it easier for owners of trademarks to prevent shops selling goods that carry counterfeit mMarks Bill, now wending its way through Parliament, is to make it easier for owners of trademarks to prevent shops selling goods that carry counterfeit marksmarks.

All brand names and product names used on this website are trade names, service marks, trademarks, or registered trademarks of their respective owners.

All other trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

CashFlow Option Loan, Flex 5 Home Loan, and all other trade / service marks are the property of of their respective owners.

All other trade - marks, service marks or registered trade - marks are the property of their respective owners.

All trade - marks are the property of their respective owners.

All other trademarks, service marks, logos, slogans, domain names, and trade names are the property of their respective owners and are licensed to, or otherwise used with permission by, PetSmart Charities.

The trademarks, service marks, trade names, domain names and logos («Trademarks») displayed on this Web site are either pending, registered or unregistered Trademarks of Treat Planet, LLC or their respective owners.

All other trade marks appearing on our Site (s) are the property of their respective owners.

All third party trade names and trade marks are the property of their respective owners and Double Eleven makes no warranty or representation in relation to them.

© 2018 / All trademarks, service marks, trade names, product names, and logos appearing on this site are property of their respective owners.

Prior jurisprudence holds that the rights granted to the owners of such «official marks» are distinct from the usual rights granted to trademark owners, and depend on whether the mark used by the defendant is «likely to be mistaken for» the official mark, as opposed to the passing - off analysis which depends on whether or not there is a «likelihood of confusion» and involves a consideration of the goods and services, channels of trade and public recognition of the respective marks involved.

«We have seen a surge in high profile trade mark infringement cases involving UK brewers, notably the estate of Elvis Presley's successful claim against BrewDog over the Scottish brewer's «Elvis Juice» beer and in turn BrewDog's successful claim against the owner of the «Draft Punk» pub in Leeds for breaching the trade mark of BrewDog's flagship beer «Punk IPA».

The lesson for owners of registered trade - marks is to ensure that they take correspondence from the Trade - marks Office seriotrade - marks is to ensure that they take correspondence from the Trade - marks Office serioTrade - marks Office seriously.

This article gives an overview of some of the similarities and differences between Canadian and US trade - mark practice so brand owners can structure their affairs accordingly when managing a cross-border trade - mark portfolio.

In this case the Registrar of Trade - marks, at the request of the respondent law firm, mailed a letter by Express Post to the registered owner.

Assisted in successfully bringing IPEC proceedings (settled in favour of the claimant) against a UK infringer on behalf of US lawyers acting for the US owner of a world famous trade mark relating to beauty pageants.

Upon receipt of such a notice the registered owner has 3 months to provide an affidavit or statutory declaration showing, with respect to each of the wares or services specified in the registration, whether the trade - mark was in use during Canada at any time in the previous three years and, if not, the date when it was last used and the reason why it has not been used since.

At the interlocutory stage in the O2 case, the High Court said that s 10 (6) effectively had to be interpreted to give a trade mark owner a remedy only where the comparative advertising fell outside of the CAD.

If the opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi is adopted by the ECJ it will be a step backward for brand protection as trade mark owners will, effectively, be unable to instigate legal proceedings for trade mark infringement in relation to comparative advertisements regardless of whether the rival advertiser uses the same or similar image (no matter how distorted) of the registered trade mark.

Further, a US trade - mark owner must file an affidavit of use between the fifth and sixth anniversary of the date of registration.

In Canada, any use of a trade - mark, including a party related to the trade - mark owner such as a corporate parent or subsidiary, must be formally licensed with the trade - mark owner having direct or indirect control over the quality or character of the licensed wares and / or services.

Knowing the similarities and differences between Canadian and American trade - mark laws can assist brand owners in effective trade - mark portfolio management on both sides of the border.

Canadian brand owners who wish to protect their trade - marks in the US should not assume that the trade - mark laws south of the border are identical to Canada's.

Nothing contained on this website shall be construed as granting any licence or right to use any Trade Mark displayed on this website without the written permission of the relevant Trade Mark owner.

This leaves a feeling that you know the internal problems a trade mark owner faces, such as budget restraints, constant audits, advising on filing and defence strategy, gap filling as new markets become of interest, or brand extension when new product ranges or services are introduced under an existing mark, and prioritising work in general.

If there is a risk that the use of «Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster» can cause confusion in the consumer that the product is in some way related to, produced by or endorsed by the owners of the IP (the owners) in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy when it isn't then this is a trade mark infringement.

If there was extra administration, such as form filling or fee paying, it could lead to a huge work load for not only practitioners but also the trade mark owners themselves, and of course the UKIPO.

This can leave the trade mark owner vulnerable to a challenge by a third party to their mark on the basis of non-use and they could actually lose their rights.

This led to clutter on the register, and more uncertainty and cost for trade mark owners, who would have difficulty in clearing marks for use and registration in 28 states, only to have to face expensive litigation against prior marks, where use of those marks in the relevant fields was questionable.

Does it make a difference to the answer if the person who wants to post a link wants to identify the site in part by the use of the principal trade mark (or logo, more likely) registered by the owner of the site?

Further, by virtue of Section 5 (4) of the TMA, a trade mark shall not be registered if, by a passing off action, the owner of an unregistered trade mark, would be entitled to prevent the use of the trade mark.

20 (1) The right of the owner of a registered trade - mark to its exclusive use is deemed to be infringed by any person who is not entitled to its use under this Act and who

The claimants (together «Cartier»), are the owners of trade marks for CARTIER and MONTBLANC (used for luxury watches and pens respectively).

A trade mark owner can not stop a rival using an identical or similar sign in a comparative advertisement where the use is not likely to confuse the public, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.

At the moment, a brand owner may only be making genuine use of their EUTM in the UK which is likely to be sufficient to maintain their trade mark (depending on the circumstances of the use).