As a therapist, I have witnessed the damage done to many families who had only the choice
of a traditional adversarial divorce at the time of their separation.
We serve couples who want to divorce with dignity and avoid the damaging effects
of traditional adversarial divorce.
Conscious uncoupling and collaborative divorce seek to redefine the construct
of the traditional adversarial divorce.
«How To Divorce Without Court While A Team of Professionals Works To Help You Preserve Your Interest, Save Money, and Protect Your Children» FREE Divorce Guide: Learn about a new approach to divorce that puts a team of experts to work for you for less than the cost
of a traditional adversarial divorce.
This concise and insightful collection of essays by collaborative attorneys, mediators, certified divorce financial analysts, and licensed family therapists points out the risks and costs
of traditional adversarial divorce litigation and illuminates a better path through the divorce minefield.»
Not exact matches
In
traditional adversarial divorce, these emotions can fuel expensive litigation, and people have often found that they need years to recover, not just from the ending
of an important relationship, but from the
divorce process itself.
- Collaborative practice is an alternative to the
traditional practice
of adversarial divorce, family law litigation,...
- Collaborative practice is an alternative to the
traditional practice
of adversarial divorce, family law litigation,...
The
traditional courtroom
divorce is part
of an
adversarial system that pits husband versus wife, mother versus father.
Alexander Mediation Group rejects the
traditional adversarial litigation approach to
divorce in favor
of the conflict resolution approach
of mediation, keeping you out
of the courtroom and in control
of your
divorce and thus your life.
Collaborative practice is a form
of dispute resolution designed to help a
divorcing couple achieve a positive resolution that minimizes negative economic, social and emotional consequences a family often experiences during a
traditional adversarial divorce process.
After handling hundreds
of traditional divorces, Mohiuddin realized that the
adversarial approach was taking an unnecessary toll on her clients.
Before assuming you have no choice other than a
traditional court - based
divorce, it makes sense to consider a less
adversarial method
of resolving your case outside
of the courtroom, such as
divorce mediation or collaborative
divorce.
Collaborative practice is an alternative to the
traditional practice
of adversarial divorce, family law litigation, and resolution
of other domestic and civil disagreements through the legal process.
Explains the collaborative
divorce practice in terms familiar to professionals who practice or have been educated and trained in more
traditional divorce practice and are interested in representing one side
of a dispute in a less
adversarial manner.
However, because
of the increased conflict and cost
of traditional divorce, many couples find it worth the investment to see if a collaborative
divorce process will work for them, before resorting to a more
adversarial process.
I strongly believe that the
traditional adversarial courtroom
divorce is destructive to families, and so I am a strong proponent
of the private, respectful collaborative
divorce process.
The collaborative law process was developed in the late 1980's as part
of a growing recognition that the
traditional adversarial litigation model
of divorce did not adequately serve the needs
of families.
Shedding their
traditional adversarial roles, the lawyers work with the husband and wife as a team to resolve
divorce - or child - related problems and to craft a settlement that will be in the best interests
of the entire family.
In many circumstances, the
adversarial nature
of traditional divorce lawsuits can make the situation even worse as parents are encouraged to make negative statements about one another, rather than concentrate on making a plan that best suits the children as well as the parents.