Sentences with phrase «of traditional divorce litigation»

This interactive, high energy training is designed for family law attorneys, mental health practitioners, and financial professionals who want to learn to use Collaborative Divorce to help families divorce in a respectful and constructive way, avoiding much of the stress and animosity typical of traditional divorce litigation.

These ex-spouse wannabe, she notes, avoid the out - of - control expenses, lengthy delays, and emotional trauma of traditional divorce litigation.

Perhaps one of the most important reasons people choose collaborative divorce instead of traditional divorce litigation is because of the sense of respect and open communication it fosters, which makes for a healthier family after the divorce.

Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution that avoids the lengthiness, emotional difficulty, and potential expense of traditional divorce litigation.

Not exact matches

In traditional litigation two lawyers (or teams of lawyers) hash out the divorce in a court of law.

In traditional adversarial divorce, these emotions can fuel expensive litigation, and people have often found that they need years to recover, not just from the ending of an important relationship, but from the divorce process itself.

- Collaborative practice is an alternative to the traditional practice of adversarial divorce, family law litigation,...

The Coach's role, in many ways, is the most complicated and nuanced of any of the professionals and the most different from traditional divorce litigation or negotiation.

- Collaborative practice is an alternative to the traditional practice of adversarial divorce, family law litigation,...

This concise and insightful collection of essays by collaborative attorneys, mediators, certified divorce financial analysts, and licensed family therapists points out the risks and costs of traditional adversarial divorce litigation and illuminates a better path through the divorce minefield.»

Arbitration is a form of dispute resolution that serves as a viable alternative to traditional divorce litigation.

Our attorneys, who have more than 125 years of combined experience, excel at traditional divorce litigation, but have also helped establish our firm as one of the leading collaborative divorce and divorce mediation firms in the area.

Since the matter is being negotiated outside the court system, the privacy of the husband and wife are upheld, as it is not subject to the same public record as a traditional divorce litigation.

As my law practice does not offer mediation services, but only «traditional» divorce, I am more likely to encounter people who have the more difficult problems that require some litigation of various issues in court.

The popularity of collaborative divorce has seen a dramatic rise in the last few years for several reasons: its goal is to take less time than traditional litigation, it allows for certain levels of creativity when addressing sensitive issues such as alimony and splitting of marital assets, it provides confidentiality to the divorcing couple, and perhaps most important, it can be less expensive than other methods of divorce.

Your case could also be suitable for collaborative divorce, a relatively new legal approach that combines the best aspects of mediation and traditional litigation — but also enables you to settle your case outside of the courtroom with the assistance of specially trained attorneys and neutral counselors and financial experts, if needed.

In most cases, divorcing spouses resolve the issues in dispute through mediation, the collaborative divorce process, through the traditional litigation model before trial, negotiation between attorneys, and sometimes with the assistance of the court.

Thus, New Jersey now has established collaborative divorce as a statutory option to traditional divorce litigation for resolution of marital disputes in a less destructive and more cooperative (and collaborative) fashion.

In truth, even in traditional divorce litigation, parties rarely get the satisfaction of a judge telling them they are right.

Negotiated agreements can be reached through a more traditional model of divorce representation, where the option of contested litigation is always available if settlement breaks down, or can be accomplished by alternative forms of dispute resolution.

Many divorcing couples, unwed parents of children and others involved in family disputes often find the no - court process known as Collaborative Law a welcome alternative to the often destructive and damaging aspects of resolving disputes or marital breakups through the traditional model of contested litigation.

The reason for this is, if you go through the collaborative divorce process but then decide to switch to traditional litigation, you may be starting from square one again, despite already having spent a great deal of time and money on legal representation.

We are a San Diego based nonprofit multi-disciplinary referral network of independent professionals trained to provide our divorce clients the option of choosing alternatives to traditional divorce litigation.

In this blog, I will go through a side by side comparison of divorce mediation vs. the more traditional route of litigation from a more emotional perspective so you can really understand the differences between the two.

Alexander Mediation Group rejects the traditional adversarial litigation approach to divorce in favor of the conflict resolution approach of mediation, keeping you out of the courtroom and in control of your divorce and thus your life.

I am convinced that the traditional divorce litigation model is becoming a last resort for more and more families and it is getting lower and lower on the list of options for them to use when they're going through family conflict.

In cooperative and collaborative divorce practice, the traditional approach of bargaining from a specific position, backed by threats of litigation and court hearings, is replaced by an approach that settles cases mindfully, practically, and respectfully.

Collaborative Divorce, achieved through the efforts and expertise of the Collaborative Divorce Team of professionals, is simply a healthier, more efficient and effective process than traditional litigation.

Most couples want to protect their children and their family from these risks of traditional litigation and do not want the details of their divorce to become public knowledge.

Overall, traditional divorce litigation is not necessarily the ideal route for contentious couples to take and should be the last choice, even if there are major differences of opinion on how certain issues should be resolved, not the first choice!

It is a highly supported divorce process that provides people with a greater level of privacy and control than traditional litigation.

Another significant benefit of divorce mediation is that it is considerably faster than traditional litigation.

Divorce mediation is a growing trend among married couples of all ages; its rising popularity is due largely to the fact that, when compared to traditional litigation, it saves time and money while preserving the relationship between the parties.

Traditional divorce litigation is a process that, by the nature of the design, tends to bring out the worst in parents and spouses.

She covers issues of cost, length of time, effect on children as well as the couple and post-divorce financial status and why Alpha's team - based divorce mediation program offers a truly worthwhile option to traditional litigation that focuses on creating a solid foundation for the future

Collaborative practice is an alternative to the traditional practice of adversarial divorce, family law litigation, and resolution of other domestic and civil disagreements through the legal process.

With the help of a great divorce mediator, you and your family can navigate the new changes to the tax laws while saving time and money by avoiding traditional divorce litigation.

Divorce mediation is typically much faster than a traditional court proceeding: by avoiding potentially dozens of hours in the courtroom, couples can greatly reduce the cost of divorce as well as the stress of litigation, without sacrificing the enforceability of a legally binding agrDivorce mediation is typically much faster than a traditional court proceeding: by avoiding potentially dozens of hours in the courtroom, couples can greatly reduce the cost of divorce as well as the stress of litigation, without sacrificing the enforceability of a legally binding agrdivorce as well as the stress of litigation, without sacrificing the enforceability of a legally binding agreement.

As an attorney who practices both Collaborative Divorce and traditional litigation I experience both the cause and the effect of the breakdown of the collaborative process.

She covers issues of cost, length of time, effect on children as well as the couple and post-divorce financial status and why Alpha's team - based divorce mediation program offers a truly worthwhile option to traditional litigation that focuses on creating a solid foundation for the future Read More

Since the attorney disqualification agreement appears to be a requirement of the collaborative law process, in the off chance that the case does not settle in collaborative mediation, if there is no disqualification agreement, the parties are free to continue using their attorneys in the traditional litigation divorce process, which would not be an option with collaborative law.

A Better Divorce was formally established in 2002 by a group of professionals whose goal was to provide a better way for people to resolve their family law matters than the traditional litigation process.

In traditional litigation two lawyers (or teams of lawyers) hash out the divorce in a court of law.

One of the biggest benefits of the Collaborative Divorce Process over traditional litigation is that it allows you, the parties seeking the divorce, greater flexibility in meeting the challenges of the divorce pDivorce Process over traditional litigation is that it allows you, the parties seeking the divorce, greater flexibility in meeting the challenges of the divorce pdivorce, greater flexibility in meeting the challenges of the divorce pdivorce process.

Of course, I will talk with them about traditional litigation, which is the court battle that often comes to mind when people think about divorce.

Collaborative Divorce is a means of resolving divorce, custody, and financial issues as an out - of - court alternative to litigation and traditional medDivorce is a means of resolving divorce, custody, and financial issues as an out - of - court alternative to litigation and traditional meddivorce, custody, and financial issues as an out - of - court alternative to litigation and traditional mediation.

After years of witnessing the often devastating fallout traditional contested divorce litigation takes on the emotional and financial well - being of families, a group of more than sixty - five committed lawyers, mental health and financial professionals formed The South Palm Beach County Collaborative Law Group, an association of attorneys, financial professionals and mental health professionals trained in the collaborative process of dispute resolution.

In deciding to seek the CDFA ™ certification, I did not do so to serve in the traditional role of a CDFA ™, either in the litigation or collaborative divorce process.

The collaborative law process was developed in the late 1980's as part of a growing recognition that the traditional adversarial litigation model of divorce did not adequately serve the needs of families.

If you put work into your settlement from the very beginning of your case then you increase the chance that the divorce process will take less time, be more amicable, and be more cost - efficient than a traditional litigation approach to divorce.