Sentences with phrase «of treating other people»

Jesus seems to be asking us to be godly in our manner of treating other people with respect.

Not exact matches

Going on a witch - hunt because someone says «Bless you» to another employee that sneezed (real example) creates an environment of paranoia and stifled self - expression, without improving how people treat each other.
Buari's Ryderz still costs $ 50, but instead of being treated like cattle, rides are in a clean minivan with only four other people.
All transgender people considered for service are subject to the same entry standards as any other candidate, and are treated as an individual of their acquired gender, according to the British Army's website.
Why have we made more progress on certain diseases while other mass - scale killers, like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are largely off of people's radars and so difficult to treat in an age of therapies which can resemble magic?
5 is a «Best Place to Work» for one simple reason: Our steadfast commitment to hire the right people, treat them as fully - formed adults, and point them toward a common vision of helping others.
The value of the market has been buoyed by people increasingly choosing more expensive treats, but volume has been weighed down by the popularity of other alternatives.
With patience we treat other people with a sense of decency, which in turn increases the possibility they will respond in kind.
Most don't make a scene over it; they just make a note of it and take their business elsewhere, while telling a dozen other people about being treated poorly.
Kaplan acknowledges that while we can't technically mistreat artificial intelligence programs in the same way we are capable of mistreating other people, how we treat AI programs may impact how we treat people.
This could actually be a list of one, as most of the other items noted below relate to treating people like numbers on a spreadsheet instead of humans who have unique goals and needs.
Instead of ignoring reporters» questions about the price increase of the drug, which is used to treat people with toxoplasmosis, Shkreli embraced the publicity, speaking with The New York Times and other media outlets, and arguing that the price of $ 750 per pill was necessary and good business.
Here is a far better set of test: Which community has beliefs tat lead its members to treat persons in other communities with love and respect - to serve them and meet their needs?
Christ would never treat people this way and I don't believe he'd approve of others discriminating in his name.
«Common values,» I found in my interviews, is a phrase that stands in for one of two things: treating other people with respect or giving back to the community.
For me, those are the people who go to church and make a loud show of prayer and other worship to be seen, but treat others badly.
Here is a far better set of test: Which community has beliefs tat lead its members to treat persons in other communities with love and respect — to serve them and meet their needs?
It doesn't so much matter when the first people were named Adam and Eve; what matters is that all humans are children of one God and ought to treat each other well.
It is also true that later people used (and still use) his teachings to oppress others, but many (perhaps most) Christians today look to the example of Jesus for guidance in how to treat others, not to the Old Testament.
Slavery is ownership of another person as property and the Bible «treats» it as acceptable by addressing it directly and determining the «acceptable» way to own other people.
Nope look at Pol Potts, etc for your answers and there are positives of treating some disabled people sufficiently like volunteer rides or volunteer civic participation or other things even be it forseful and looking for excessive tax cuts.
I have yet to see anywhere in the Bible a condemnation of owning other people, which seems obviously wrong to most people today, regardless of how well slaves are treated they are still property.
As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.
fail to understand the rich vocabulary of symbolism provided by etiquette, which enables people to recognize essential attributes or intentions of others, such as that a man wearing a tie is treating the occasion seriously.
And they reduce them to slavery, treating them with afflictions they would scarcely use with brute animals... Therefore, We... noting that the Indians themselves indeed are true men... by our Apostolic Authority decree and declare by these present letters that the same Indians and all other peoples — even though theyare outside the faith... should not be deprived of their liberty or their other possessions... and are not to be reduced to slavery, and that whatever happens to the contrary is to be considered null and void.»
[4] «cf. Meilaender, Gilbert, The Giving and Taking of Organs, First Things, March 2008, where he emphasises that humans are called to live their bodily life as a personal gift to others and that «presumed consent... does go a long way toward treating persons as handy repositories of interchangeable parts to others
It is identical to racial issues: civil and church laws need to protect the truth about the equal dignity of all races because that truth allows us to treat others as persons.
«Whatever insults human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery... the selling of women and children; as well as disgraceful working conditions, where men are treated as mere tools for profit, rather than as free and responsible persons; all these things and others of their like are infamies indeed... they are a supreme dishonour to the Creator.»
In a recent Ethics Daily post, Dennis Atwood wrote that the «ongoing process of «knowing» God should make a real difference in the way we live, make decisions, and treat other people
In population control, euthanasia, abortion, and eugenics, the human person is treated as an object or product to be used or eliminated according to the purposes of those who have power over others.
Any value Jesus had was in the universality of his message about how all people should treat all other people.
The alternative would be to make a tactical retreat, hand over our schools gradually to the state, and insist on the right of Catholic pupils in state education to be treated with the same consideration as people of other faiths.
These people can say what they want, treat others in the most despicable, cruel and out right evil ways, and their supporters, (friends and other leaders) will justify the wrong doing without any regard to the word of God.
These (most) People just use it as a diversion to distract people away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of theirPeople just use it as a diversion to distract people away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of theirpeople away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of their shoe.
Islam believes Jews and Christians are people of the book and should be treated with respect as well as other religions.
The categorical imperative to «treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46) was, for Kant, the «universal law of nature» (38) and his understanding of it is the most radical conception of natural law in its modern sense.
On Apel's account, these rights articulate the valid meaning that can be given to the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative: «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46).
I also like Matthew Vines's work — full of scriptural stuff — if you have to take the Bible literally enough to treat other people like dirt, that may help you.
To «do unto others as you would have others do unto you» implies that people are all alike, and that one proceeds by projecting one's own preferences upon the rest of humanity, then treating everyone else as a replica of oneself.
But maybe that set apartness is supposed to be more in the way we show grace for people we dislike, or the way we treat others, not in what aspects of modern culture we eschew.
The best way to bring the sinfulness of such sins home to us is to point toward the places where humans in fact act wrongly: in home, school, business, contacts with others, and the like, where by pride, self - seeking, neglect of our neighbors, ugliness of behavior in our homes, and so much else, we often behave in a reprehensible manner or we subtly and insidiously treat other persons as mere «things.»
There in the closed room, where one probed and treated the isolated psyche according to the inclination of the self - encapsulated patient, the patient was referred to ever - deeper levels of his inwardness as to his proper world; here outside, in the immediacy of human standing over against each other, the encapsulation must and can be broken through, and a transformed, healed relationship must and can be opened to the sick person in his relations to otherness — to the world of the other which he can not remove into his soul.
Kant's categorical imperatives, «Act always on such a maxim as thou canst at the same time will to be a universal law» and «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only,» are actually in one sense imposed from without.
Persons who are initially grouped together according to some particular feature come to be treated as interchangeable units and thus are driven into identification with each other and into similar patterns of life which extend the range of likenesses.
«There is never any doubt in the Bible that we are to treat others properly and New World form of slavery where the person was the property of another was against the law of God.»
Thus there is very little disagreement with Kant's famous dictum: «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as a means only.»
The improvement of moral character individually and collectively requires each person to be treated with and to treat others with dignity and to have enough to be able to become functioning members of the communion of the faithful.
The Christian extreme bias that a person is evil simply because they don't think Jesus was any more than a good example of how humanity should treat each other, is a position non-believers know too well.
Some have told us they have enough sandwiches, crackers and some of the other things that are frequently given to them, but they need more people who treat them as people.
Ancient literature, like modern fairy tales, is full of narratives in which gods and other supernatural beings disguise themselves as human beings, sometimes as the lowest of the low, and roam throughout the world to see how people will treat them.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z