Sentences with phrase «of trial court»

The California Court of Appeal, First District, affirmed the rulings of the trial court.

Thus, the rulings of the trial court were affirmed.

The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine affirmed the ruling of the trial court in the property line dispute, but reversed the ruling on the tortious interference with economic advantage allegations and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

Believing that Indiana courts would find a similar requirement existed for appraisers, the court affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The court agreed that the evidence supported an award of double damages, and so the rulings of the trial court were affirmed.

Therefore, the court affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The trial court ruled against the Brokerage, and the appellate court affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the rulings of the trial court in an unpublished opinion.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, affirmed the rulings of the trial court.

Below is a summary of the trial court decision.

Thus, the court affirmed the rulings of the trial court upholding the REALTOR ® arbitration process.

The California Court of Appeal, Third District, affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The United State Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The Court of Appeals of Tennessee affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II, affirmed the rulings of the trial court.

The court also held that, in the context of arbitration, findings of a trial court should not be disturbed unless the findings are clearly wrong, or the trial justice misconceived or overlooked material evidence.

The United State Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

Thus, the rulings of the trial court in favor of the Bank were affirmed.

Thus the court rejected the Owner's argument about the application of the Rules to its agreement with Hubbell and affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The Supreme Court of Iowa affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit, reversed the ruling of the trial court.

Thus, the court reversed the jury verdict's award of future commissions but affirmed the other awards as well as the other rulings of the trial court.

The Supreme Court of Connecticut affirmed the ruling of the trial court.

The Court of Appeals of Mississippi affirmed the award of the trial court.

Connecticut's highest court affirmed the ruling of a trial court that a Connecticut broker's agreement to split the commission with a broker licensed in another jurisdiction is not legal under Connecticut law.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit affirmed the ruling of the trial court, finding that the mortgage broker did not meet the definitions of a creditor as set by the Act or by Regulation Z, the implementation regulation issued by the Federal Reserve for the Act.

However, in a reversal of the trial court, the appellate court granted the purchasers an opportunity to file an amended complaint.

On second appeal, the court determined that in Massachusetts the «single look» approach should be used and affirmed the decision of the trial court.

The appeals court will also turn to the record of the trial court for further analysis.

The findings of the trial court are supported by substantial evidence.»

In short, from our review of the trial court's November 4, 2005 Judgment Entry, it is apparent that the trial court considered all of the best interest factors set forth in R.C. 3109.04 (F)... [T] he trial court... clearly found that, based on consideration of all of the factors, it was in Daisy's best interest for custody to be granted to [the father].»

Father's assignment of error overruled, judgment of trial court affirmed, custody to remain with mother.

[Appeal of trial court's change of custody granted: To change custody on four factors alone, as enunciated by the trial judge, and give less than equal weight to the love, affection and emotional ties the son had for and to his mother, her husband and her other children was found to be an error in law.]»

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Administrative Office of the Trial Court: Child Support Guidelines

The Appellate Division upheld findings of the trial court regarding the responsibility of a NJ family law firm for the international abduction of a child.

By law, these state Guidelines must be updated every four years by a Task Force appointed by the Chief Justice of the Trial Court.

If you can't reach a custody agreement with your spouse, divorce means putting your family in the hands of a trial court judge.

For me this is still a bit of a head scratcher: the engineering is highly sophisticated but the coverage is so spotty as to make it of small use in many cases; certainly someone in Ontario, for example, is unlikely to get much joy from it, given the absence of trial court judgments.

BC Provincial Court www.provincialcourt.bc.ca The Provincial Court is the first level of trial court in British Columbia and hears criminal, criminal youth, family, child protection, small claims, and traffic cases.

In Louisiana, whether motion pictures or video tapes are admissible at trial is largely within the discretion of the trial court.

The Supreme Judicial Court announced that MBBB attorney John Carroll is one of three attorneys that have been appointed to the Commission on Judicial Conduct (CJC) by the Chief Justice of the Trial Court.

Christopher Burkett is an experienced trial advocate, having appeared before a variety of administrative tribunals, at all levels of trial court, and the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

The Court agreed with the arguments presented by Mr. Kump and his team, ruling in favor of their clients and summarily denying Petitioners» request for an emergency stay and reversal of the trial court's orders in an international child custody case.

The Superior Court found persuasive the reasoning of the trial court that imposing a duty here would greatly expend judicial resources and would result in judicial activism.

This paper first considers the facts of R v Taylor and discusses the decisions of the trial court, the Alberta Court of Appeal, and the SCC.