Sentences with phrase «of trial court decisions»

Organization The bulk of trial court decisions that are appealed are never heard by the Supreme Court.

Represented on appeal and remand a nationally prominent attorney in litigation seeking a share of a fee exceeding $ 100 million, obtaining reversal of a trial court decision dismissing the action.

Below is a summary of the trial court decision.

Not exact matches

In a decision released by the Baltimore Circuit Court, Judge Martin P. Welch wrote that the 35 - year - old was being granted a new trial because his initial council failed to properly cross-examine an expert from the state about the reliability of cell tower data that seemed to place him at the scene of the crime.

After years of trial, court ruling came to a settlement decision with Facebook handing out $ 65 million to the Winklevoss twins.

The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board can no longer review only some of the patent claims challenged by petitioners in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the U.S. Supreme Court said on Tuesday in a 5 - 4 decision.

The judge, who had analysed evidence at a trial in the Family Division of the High Court in London earlier this month, said he had reached his decision with «profound sadness».

We are elated with the Court of Appeals» decision to stop field trials of Bt - talong.

SB 219 would serve to clarify employer requirements and keep New Hampshire in compliance with current Federal laws and court decisions, including the March 25 Supreme Court ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodatcourt decisions, including the March 25 Supreme Court ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodatCourt ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodatcourt's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodations.

Silver's convictions were overturned last year based on a Supreme Court decision which narrowed the definition of an official act and how it can be used in a corruption trial.

The conviction was one of the most touted victories of former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's anti-corruption campaign, but the outcome was known to be in doubt because of the Supreme Court decision in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, which followed Silver's trial.

Sometimes when a Supreme Court Justice is out sick, or there's only an even number of Justices currently appointed, the Court makes a tie decision, (which may result in accepting a lower court's decision), making the Supreme Court trial a bit of a wCourt Justice is out sick, or there's only an even number of Justices currently appointed, the Court makes a tie decision, (which may result in accepting a lower court's decision), making the Supreme Court trial a bit of a wCourt makes a tie decision, (which may result in accepting a lower court's decision), making the Supreme Court trial a bit of a wcourt's decision), making the Supreme Court trial a bit of a wCourt trial a bit of a waste.

I am referring to the decision of the Hon. Attorney - General to curtail the trial of the infamous Delta Force members who stormed a session of the Kumasi Circuit Court and aided the escape of 13 of their colleagues who were standing trial, by entering a Nolle Prosequi — «Refuse to Pursue.»

Bruno was convicted at his first trial in Albany but appealed on the basis of a Supreme Court decision that narrowed the federal honest services statute.

As it stands, it is clear that the court below premised its decision on this issue on a wrong appreciation of the claim of the appellants before the trial Federal High Ccourt below premised its decision on this issue on a wrong appreciation of the claim of the appellants before the trial Federal High CourtCourt.

The Missouri Supreme Court «agreed with the trial court's decision to dismiss several counts (including partisan gerrymandering claims), but remanded for a determination of whether the congressional districts (particularly districts 3 and 5) were sufficiently compact under state constitutional law.&rCourt «agreed with the trial court's decision to dismiss several counts (including partisan gerrymandering claims), but remanded for a determination of whether the congressional districts (particularly districts 3 and 5) were sufficiently compact under state constitutional law.&rcourt's decision to dismiss several counts (including partisan gerrymandering claims), but remanded for a determination of whether the congressional districts (particularly districts 3 and 5) were sufficiently compact under state constitutional law.»

For trial court judges, the prospect of appellate review of their decisions partially mitigates the risk of a judge making bad decisions due to declining intellectual capacity.

Appealing his conviction, lawyers for former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos say he should receive a new trial based on the outcome of a Supreme Court decision outlining how public corruption charges should be interpreted.

According to the Court of Appeal, Metuh and his company failed to first obtain the leave of either the trial court or the appellate court before filing a notice of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and fCourt of Appeal, Metuh and his company failed to first obtain the leave of either the trial court or the appellate court before filing a notice of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and fcourt or the appellate court before filing a notice of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and fcourt before filing a notice of appeal as required by the constitution when filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and facts.

The appeals court said that the trial judge would need to instruct jurors on the law in a different manner to conform with a 2016 Supreme Court decision that reversed the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDoncourt said that the trial judge would need to instruct jurors on the law in a different manner to conform with a 2016 Supreme Court decision that reversed the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonCourt decision that reversed the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Federal prosecutors argue in court papers that former state Sen. John Sampson doesn't deserve a new trial despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDoncourt papers that former state Sen. John Sampson doesn't deserve a new trial despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonCourt's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Although the jury instructions will have to be revised in light of the Supreme Court decision, the presentation of evidence and testimony is largely expected to track that of the first trial.

Outside of Manhattan's Federal District Court, site of the three - week trial, Silver's lawyers said they would file motions to challenge the jury's decision.

Onjeh said, «Being dissatisfied with the ruling of the Election Petition Tribunal, which struck out my petition, I approached the Court of Appeal to set aside the decision of the lower court, and order the trial of my petiCourt of Appeal to set aside the decision of the lower court, and order the trial of my peticourt, and order the trial of my petition.

The appeals court said the trial judge would need to instruct jurors on the law differently to conform with a 2016 Supreme Court decision reversing the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDoncourt said the trial judge would need to instruct jurors on the law differently to conform with a 2016 Supreme Court decision reversing the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonCourt decision reversing the public corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Thibodeau's lawyer, Lisa Peebles, said she received notice today that the case can move forward to the Court of Appeals, which will hear an appeal of acting Oswego County Judge Daniel King's decision not to grant Thibodeau a new trial.

Bharara has already seen his record on Albany corruption tained after his high - profile convictions of former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos (R - Nassau County) and ex-Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D - Manhattan) were overturned on appeal as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision that came out after their trials that limited what is considered bribery.

The decision by U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni came shortly after lawyers from four separate defense teams rested their case Monday in the corruption trial of Percoco and three business executives.

ZUG, Switzerland; CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts; BERKELEY, California; DUBLIN, Ireland; July 25, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE)-- CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ: CRSP), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTLA), Caribou Biosciences, Inc. and ERS Genomics, Ltd. announced that The Regents of the University of California, the University of Vienna, and Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively «UC»), co-owners of foundational intellectual property relating to CRISPR / Cas9 genome engineering, today submitted an appellate brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the «Federal Circuit») seeking reversal of a decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB») in an interference proceeding relating to CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing technology.

Appeal seeks reversal of Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision terminating interference without determining priority of inventorship of CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing Brief asserts that the Board failed to properly apply controlling U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit precedents, and ignored evidence of multiple groups readily applying CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing to eukaryotic cells following teachings of Charpentier - Doudna team

That paved the way for a bizarre 2011 trial court decision holding that the state was underfunding education by billions of dollars each year.

Holding that the state's school finance system was rationally related to the constitution's requirement to provide «a thorough and uniform» system of public schools, the majority rejected the trial court's decision in its entirety.

In August 2016, the state's First District Court of Appeals upheld the trial court's deciCourt of Appeals upheld the trial court's decicourt's decision.

The Court's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for tCourt's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for tcourt decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for tcourt for trial.

A New Jersey judge has ruled that the Woodbury school district may continue its 22 - year - old policy of starting each school day with a moment of silence «for contemplation» pending a trial on that case and decisions in two related federal - court cases.

In late 2011, a trial court judge, Sheila Rappaport, issued a bizarre and outrageous decision declaring that Colorado was underfunding education by billions of dollars.

In April, the California Court of Appeal overturned the trial court's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisiCourt of Appeal overturned the trial court's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisicourt's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisions.)

The ruling by a three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued March 12, remands for trial a decision issued last year by U.S. District Judge Neal P. McCurn of Syracuse, N.Y.

If it denies the request, the Court of Appeal's decision will become final and the case will go to trial.

Marcellus McRae, a lawyer for the Vergara team who did most of the questioning during the two - month trial, said the value of a court decision is that it was free of political partisanship and influence with an unassailable rationale: «There's no negotiating around the Constitution.

Released, yesterday, was the Court of Appeal's decision reversing the trial court's earlier deciCourt of Appeal's decision reversing the trial court's earlier decicourt's earlier decision.

Alexandria, Va. (September 30, 2015)- The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by the Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) filed a «friend of the court» (amicus) brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding Salazar v. South San Antonio Independent School District, urging the Court to overturn the trial court's decicourt» (amicus) brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding Salazar v. South San Antonio Independent School District, urging the Court to overturn the trial court's deciCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding Salazar v. South San Antonio Independent School District, urging the Court to overturn the trial court's deciCourt to overturn the trial court's decicourt's decision.

In the brief, the amici (NSBA, et al.) urge the Court to review the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit extending the stay - put obligation through completion of all appeals — a departure from previous court rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a deciCourt to review the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit extending the stay - put obligation through completion of all appeals — a departure from previous court rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a deciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit extending the stay - put obligation through completion of all appeals — a departure from previous court rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a decicourt rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a decicourt issued a decision.

1998 — The Fourth District Court of Appeals hears oral arguments on Vincent vs. Voight and upholds the trial court deciCourt of Appeals hears oral arguments on Vincent vs. Voight and upholds the trial court decicourt decision.

The ruling was a stunning, wholesale reversal of trial and appeals court decisions that found for the plaintiffs, with damages to the Orleans Parish school system and the state estimated as high as $ 1.5 billion to pay the employees» back pay and benefits.

The groups urge the Court to review the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit extending the stay - put obligation through completion of all appeals — a departure from previous court rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a deciCourt to review the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit extending the stay - put obligation through completion of all appeals — a departure from previous court rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a deciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit extending the stay - put obligation through completion of all appeals — a departure from previous court rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a decicourt rulings that limited the stay - put obligation only until a trial court issued a decicourt issued a decision.

Note: In the CCJEF trial court decision, now on appeal, Judge Moukawsher, in contrast to all precedents across the country, limited the notion of adequacy to comprise only sufficient teachers, facilities and instrumentalities of learning - and he said the state is already providing adequate funding.

The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.

On the grounds that Judge Denise Cote's decision to move forward with the classification and damages phases of the trial on going case, Apple managed to win a stay by the three - judge panel of the Second Circuit court, at least for now.

This Court reviews «all final decisions of the trial courts, state agencies and local governments.