At some point in the past, there might have been a fair amount
of truth to this claim.
Not exact matches
Of course, there will always be skeptics who claim Nolan cast the singer to help market his film, but the truth of the matter is, the director's films have always contained concepts (like «Inception» and «Interstellar») or iconic figures (Batman and The Joker) who are far bigger than any actor who has appeared in the
Of course, there will always be skeptics who
claim Nolan cast the singer
to help market his film, but the
truth of the matter is, the director's films have always contained concepts (like «Inception» and «Interstellar») or iconic figures (Batman and The Joker) who are far bigger than any actor who has appeared in the
of the matter is, the director's films have always contained concepts (like «Inception» and «Interstellar») or iconic figures (Batman and The Joker) who are far bigger than any actor who has appeared in them.
The magazine denied that account, and Murray had said on Twitter that there was «not a speck
of truth»
to Trump's
claim.
But the
truth is that most
of these rosy pictures don't ring true; entrepreneurs who
claim they'll win 100 percent market share within a three - year period sound naive, which is a major turnoff
to investors.
It also
claims the companies were aware
of their impacts on climate and tried
to obfuscate the
truth.
Assange has made a point
of comparing his organization
to traditional media outlets, saying in a recent opinion piece in the Post that his motive «is identical
to that
claimed by the New York Times and the Post —
to publish newsworthy content,» and that WikiLeaks publishes material «irrespective
of whether sources came by that
truth legally or have the right
to release it.»
Rather than assuming suppliers are telling the
truth or being ambivalent over the difficulty
of verifying
claims, product producers and suppliers would do well
to acknowledge just how limited their quality - control reach really is.
Malcolm Gladwell may or may not have been completely right when he
claimed that becoming a true expert in any subject requires 10,000 hours
of practice, but whether his exact number stands up
to scrutiny, the underlying
truth still holds — getting good at things is time - consuming and involves a lot
of hard work.
Although many marketers
claim to know their audience, the
truth is a lot
of them aren't doing much more than throwing social content and media spaghetti at the wall hoping it sticks.
Daniels is seeking $ 75,000 in damages, according
to the Wall Street Journal, and
claims she had
to hire bodyguards and suffered damage
to her reputation as a result
of Trump's online smear, which the lawsuit alleges Trump made with «reckless disregard» for the
truth.
There is probably
truth in both
of those, but I do think it is important, in considering
claims of irrational exuberance,
to note that the earnings price ratio - interest rate relationship is in a very difference place than it has been in past peaks.
With the latest funding, Amino will continue on its quest
to becoming «the single source
of truth for American healthcare,» as the company says, meaning pulling together enough data from insurance
claims to create a comprehensive and trusted source
of information about healthcare access, cost and quality.
«It was
of unclear
truth — and the
claim that Facemash was somehow connected
to the development
of Facebook.
Still, he says that he doesn't want
to be part
of a party (i.e., the Republican party) that upholds what he describes as unreason, but he also doesn't
claim that such alleged scientific
truth regarding ultimate questions
of human destiny provides answers for public policy.
In
truth, every time a christian
claims to know what «god» thinks, they are simply elevating themselves
to the position
of «god.»
Christians should be the first
to saddle up next
to others
claiming the name
of Jesus and speak
truth to them when there are those going over an edge.
Empty chair is nothing else but sign
of American moral hinduism, bankruptcy,
claiming to follow
truth absolute by consti tution
of USA, but always denying by hindu Judaism filthy self center ism, way
of hindu Magi's, tricksters
to hind fool humanity.
That's quite a list
of theories
to claim you have absolute
truth for.
Since there is nothing new under the sun, there might be more reason
to be suspicious
of anything that
claims to be «new
truth.»
This is what helps you
to understand that the account is the
truth, that when you
claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then
claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared
to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts
of credit
to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.
In his Natural History
of Religion (1757), the Scottish philosopher David Hume — in agreement with other skeptical and agnostic English and French thinkers — said that Christianity's
claim to absolute
truth was
to be blamed for the devastating civil wars that had taken place in Britain and France.
No, it was because
of hinduism, denial
of truth absolute by hindu's, ignorant s,
claiming to be follower
of truth absolute GOD in hinduism, ignorance.
There is really no difference between you and all those religious nuts, running around,
claiming to be in a posession
of the
truth.
And a gap is an absence, not evidence
of anything, and certainly not an invitation
to insert unreasonable
claims as if they were equivalent
to truth.
Numerous people on both sides responded obliquely but did not answer, and a few on each side
claimed to already possess knowledge
of absolute
truth.
But if this is used
to invalidate all
claims to discern the
truth, it is in fact an arrogant
claim with the kind
of knowledge which is superior that you have just said, no religion has.»
It is one thing
to offend by speaking
truth, that'll happen, but any other type
of offence is unnecessary and against the teachings (which show God's heart on the matter) in scripture for those who
claim to «know Him».
A prolepsis, as he uses the notion, is simply a
claim staked out in history, which, when and if history is fulfilled, will be verified or falsified, and which is
of such a nature that those who in the meantime have accepted it will all along have been living appropriately
to the
truth that will at the end be discovered.
The atheist who
claims to come from a «faith» background is extremely confused and more
to be pitied than admired.Had the supposed «believer» continued in the «faith» they
claim to have forsaken, they would ultimately have appeared before God and been rejected.These were deceived, they never met God, they never knew God and they never understood God.They are devoid
of the
Truth and twice lost.There is hope while they still breathe Gods gift
of life that they might someday meet and be reconciled
to God, but their lying nature makes salvation less likely.Debate with them is an exercise in futility.God bless
That however does NOT mean that the bible is not true (An ad hominem (Latin for «
to the man» or «
to the person»), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt
to negate the
truth of a
claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief
of the person supporting it)
For Hume advanced a philosophy that, if taken at face value, would not only undermine the
claims to truth of religion but those
of morality and
of science also.
She said that exclusive
claims to religious
truth should become «obsolete» because 9/11 demonstrated the destructive power
of that type
of thinking (the 9/11 hijackers were motivated in part by an extremist form
of Islam).
In a time that promises the reconcilation
of happiness and productivity through chemical mood control, we can
claim a right
to our «natural moods» only if we can show that they aren't — like everything else in the cosmos — finally random collections chemicals or just tools for species survival but are natural gifts or indispensable clues
to the
truth about who we are.
Dabblers are compelled by their very dabbling
to disdain those who will not dabble and who persist in believing the
truth claims of one particular religion.
If that is true
of the gospel's most counterintuitive
claim — that it is through the unjust death
of a just man that the world is redeemed — it is also true
of his
claim to be the
truth that is the way
to authentic human life, and
to eternal life.
You lambaste Matt Walsh for
claiming to be a «Speaker
of Truths» then go on
to post what I can only assume what you believe
to be true, or «Speaking the
Truth» unless you do not believe what you speak.
Christianity is «intolerant» in the sense that (like its monotheistic relatives, Judaism and Islam) it
claims to possess a universal
truth superior
to the teachings
of other religions; and it has spread this doctrine with a missionary zeal perhaps exceeding even Islam's.
His skepticism undermines the idea
of objective
truth and thereby gives reason
to be suspicious
of claims and policies based on the assumption
of it.
♦ Carl Trueman argues that confessions establish constitutional restraints on church power: «In an age when words, especially words that make
truth claims, are always suspected
of being part
of some manipulative power game, it is perhaps counterintuitive
to think
of confessions as delimiting the power
of the church.
Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people
claim to have read and match it
to the scientific evidence that points very clearly
to the validity and
truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want
to hear it.
Much
of what has been posted are inconvenient
truths about the Mormon religion that you all simply choose
to ignore, overlook or
claim we «don't understand.»
Both are used
to signal the reader or TV viewer that the idea, point
of view or product has authoritative support and is supposed
to work and one not need question it's
truth claims or usefulness.
the audacity and ego
of religion that
claims it has the
truth of every thing and needs no proof
to prove it!
People are evil, and in need
of a savior, and no atheist can make an exclusive
claim otherwise without
claiming to have a basis for their «objective»
truth.
[«While these
claims have been made repeatedly over the last century, the
truth of the matter is that skeptics and liberal theologians are unable
to cite a single piece
of solid archaeological evidence in support
of their
claims.
Fortunately for us, the argument ought not
to be about our personal validity, but
to the objective
claims we make about the
truths of scripture and the essential elements that genuine Christian faith has and does contribute
to society.
This guy is not doing scientific «studies»
to show the
truth of his
claim and publishing them and submitting them for peer review.
You can go around lying
to people with your
claimed certainty and your delusion
of truth.
Actually, well for me personally anyway, I am interested in this and «all» religions, as they pretty much all seem
to be
claiming TRUTH, especially all
of the christian denominations.
Atheists decry the
claim of Christianity
to having
truth exclusive
to only believers, without realizing that the
claims they make about
truth and reality actually are just as exclusive and less factually - based.