Sentences with phrase «of truth to the claim»

At some point in the past, there might have been a fair amount of truth to this claim.

Not exact matches

Of course, there will always be skeptics who claim Nolan cast the singer to help market his film, but the truth of the matter is, the director's films have always contained concepts (like «Inception» and «Interstellar») or iconic figures (Batman and The Joker) who are far bigger than any actor who has appeared in theOf course, there will always be skeptics who claim Nolan cast the singer to help market his film, but the truth of the matter is, the director's films have always contained concepts (like «Inception» and «Interstellar») or iconic figures (Batman and The Joker) who are far bigger than any actor who has appeared in theof the matter is, the director's films have always contained concepts (like «Inception» and «Interstellar») or iconic figures (Batman and The Joker) who are far bigger than any actor who has appeared in them.

The magazine denied that account, and Murray had said on Twitter that there was «not a speck of truth» to Trump's claim.

But the truth is that most of these rosy pictures don't ring true; entrepreneurs who claim they'll win 100 percent market share within a three - year period sound naive, which is a major turnoff to investors.

It also claims the companies were aware of their impacts on climate and tried to obfuscate the truth.

Assange has made a point of comparing his organization to traditional media outlets, saying in a recent opinion piece in the Post that his motive «is identical to that claimed by the New York Times and the Post — to publish newsworthy content,» and that WikiLeaks publishes material «irrespective of whether sources came by that truth legally or have the right to release it.»

Rather than assuming suppliers are telling the truth or being ambivalent over the difficulty of verifying claims, product producers and suppliers would do well to acknowledge just how limited their quality - control reach really is.

Malcolm Gladwell may or may not have been completely right when he claimed that becoming a true expert in any subject requires 10,000 hours of practice, but whether his exact number stands up to scrutiny, the underlying truth still holds — getting good at things is time - consuming and involves a lot of hard work.

Although many marketers claim to know their audience, the truth is a lot of them aren't doing much more than throwing social content and media spaghetti at the wall hoping it sticks.

Daniels is seeking $ 75,000 in damages, according to the Wall Street Journal, and claims she had to hire bodyguards and suffered damage to her reputation as a result of Trump's online smear, which the lawsuit alleges Trump made with «reckless disregard» for the truth.

There is probably truth in both of those, but I do think it is important, in considering claims of irrational exuberance, to note that the earnings price ratio - interest rate relationship is in a very difference place than it has been in past peaks.

With the latest funding, Amino will continue on its quest to becoming «the single source of truth for American healthcare,» as the company says, meaning pulling together enough data from insurance claims to create a comprehensive and trusted source of information about healthcare access, cost and quality.

«It was of unclear truth — and the claim that Facemash was somehow connected to the development of Facebook.

Still, he says that he doesn't want to be part of a party (i.e., the Republican party) that upholds what he describes as unreason, but he also doesn't claim that such alleged scientific truth regarding ultimate questions of human destiny provides answers for public policy.

In truth, every time a christian claims to know what «god» thinks, they are simply elevating themselves to the position of «god.»

Christians should be the first to saddle up next to others claiming the name of Jesus and speak truth to them when there are those going over an edge.

Empty chair is nothing else but sign of American moral hinduism, bankruptcy, claiming to follow truth absolute by consti tution of USA, but always denying by hindu Judaism filthy self center ism, way of hindu Magi's, tricksters to hind fool humanity.

That's quite a list of theories to claim you have absolute truth for.

Since there is nothing new under the sun, there might be more reason to be suspicious of anything that claims to be «new truth.»

This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.

In his Natural History of Religion (1757), the Scottish philosopher David Hume — in agreement with other skeptical and agnostic English and French thinkers — said that Christianity's claim to absolute truth was to be blamed for the devastating civil wars that had taken place in Britain and France.

No, it was because of hinduism, denial of truth absolute by hindu's, ignorant s, claiming to be follower of truth absolute GOD in hinduism, ignorance.

There is really no difference between you and all those religious nuts, running around, claiming to be in a posession of the truth.

And a gap is an absence, not evidence of anything, and certainly not an invitation to insert unreasonable claims as if they were equivalent to truth.

Numerous people on both sides responded obliquely but did not answer, and a few on each side claimed to already possess knowledge of absolute truth.

But if this is used to invalidate all claims to discern the truth, it is in fact an arrogant claim with the kind of knowledge which is superior that you have just said, no religion has.»

It is one thing to offend by speaking truth, that'll happen, but any other type of offence is unnecessary and against the teachings (which show God's heart on the matter) in scripture for those who claim to «know Him».

A prolepsis, as he uses the notion, is simply a claim staked out in history, which, when and if history is fulfilled, will be verified or falsified, and which is of such a nature that those who in the meantime have accepted it will all along have been living appropriately to the truth that will at the end be discovered.

The atheist who claims to come from a «faith» background is extremely confused and more to be pitied than admired.Had the supposed «believer» continued in the «faith» they claim to have forsaken, they would ultimately have appeared before God and been rejected.These were deceived, they never met God, they never knew God and they never understood God.They are devoid of the Truth and twice lost.There is hope while they still breathe Gods gift of life that they might someday meet and be reconciled to God, but their lying nature makes salvation less likely.Debate with them is an exercise in futility.God bless

That however does NOT mean that the bible is not true (An ad hominem (Latin for «to the man» or «to the person»), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it)

For Hume advanced a philosophy that, if taken at face value, would not only undermine the claims to truth of religion but those of morality and of science also.

She said that exclusive claims to religious truth should become «obsolete» because 9/11 demonstrated the destructive power of that type of thinking (the 9/11 hijackers were motivated in part by an extremist form of Islam).

In a time that promises the reconcilation of happiness and productivity through chemical mood control, we can claim a right to our «natural moods» only if we can show that they aren't — like everything else in the cosmos — finally random collections chemicals or just tools for species survival but are natural gifts or indispensable clues to the truth about who we are.

Dabblers are compelled by their very dabbling to disdain those who will not dabble and who persist in believing the truth claims of one particular religion.

If that is true of the gospel's most counterintuitive claim — that it is through the unjust death of a just man that the world is redeemed — it is also true of his claim to be the truth that is the way to authentic human life, and to eternal life.

You lambaste Matt Walsh for claiming to be a «Speaker of Truths» then go on to post what I can only assume what you believe to be true, or «Speaking the Truth» unless you do not believe what you speak.

Christianity is «intolerant» in the sense that (like its monotheistic relatives, Judaism and Islam) it claims to possess a universal truth superior to the teachings of other religions; and it has spread this doctrine with a missionary zeal perhaps exceeding even Islam's.

His skepticism undermines the idea of objective truth and thereby gives reason to be suspicious of claims and policies based on the assumption of it.

♦ Carl Trueman argues that confessions establish constitutional restraints on church power: «In an age when words, especially words that make truth claims, are always suspected of being part of some manipulative power game, it is perhaps counterintuitive to think of confessions as delimiting the power of the church.

Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.

Much of what has been posted are inconvenient truths about the Mormon religion that you all simply choose to ignore, overlook or claim we «don't understand.»

Both are used to signal the reader or TV viewer that the idea, point of view or product has authoritative support and is supposed to work and one not need question it's truth claims or usefulness.

the audacity and ego of religion that claims it has the truth of every thing and needs no proof to prove it!

People are evil, and in need of a savior, and no atheist can make an exclusive claim otherwise without claiming to have a basis for their «objective» truth.

[«While these claims have been made repeatedly over the last century, the truth of the matter is that skeptics and liberal theologians are unable to cite a single piece of solid archaeological evidence in support of their claims.

Fortunately for us, the argument ought not to be about our personal validity, but to the objective claims we make about the truths of scripture and the essential elements that genuine Christian faith has and does contribute to society.

This guy is not doing scientific «studies» to show the truth of his claim and publishing them and submitting them for peer review.

You can go around lying to people with your claimed certainty and your delusion of truth.

Actually, well for me personally anyway, I am interested in this and «all» religions, as they pretty much all seem to be claiming TRUTH, especially all of the christian denominations.

Atheists decry the claim of Christianity to having truth exclusive to only believers, without realizing that the claims they make about truth and reality actually are just as exclusive and less factually - based.