You can always count on the church to differentiate severity
of types of sins even though god supposedly doesn't.
what i get from this is that (and i may be incorrect) but i can rape, murder, lie, and commit adultery (and i choose these because these are
some of the types of sin i would call willful) and still have my free gift of salvation, meaning simply i will go to heaven.
Not exact matches
And, even more, this
type of explosive growth can cover up a variety
of sins, including a relatively high revenue churn rate (like the 3 % we saw in our study).
Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one
of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all
of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any
type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs
of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation
of the origin
of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your
sin and hatred
of the one true God.
I would actually label prostitution as a «
sin» in the
type of category that actually can ruin relationships — internally and externally.
God the Father turned His face away from His Son when He suffered on the cross (which was the worst
type of death, reserved for the worst sinners in those days), when Jesus carried the curse
of all
of mankinds
sins (past, present and future) and wrath
of God because
of those
sins.
If religion allows this
type of behavior and hides it how can this not be a «
sin».
The only big
sin here is organized religion
of any
type.
While some
of this is a result
of sin, much
of this chaos is because this is the
type of creation God made.
I think he had heard rumors that my
type of theology existed, but he had never met anyone who was so willing to give him a license to
sin as I had just done.
Adam is a «
type»
of Christ — but only in the sense that Adam was the one man through whom the curse
of sin came, and Christ is the one Man through whom the gift
of salvation came.
Does this mean that even the unpardonable
sin of denying the testimony
of the holy spirit is under Charizomai
type forgiveness?
We know enough about
sin to know that blacks will kill a white and white will kill a black, but there would be some
type of response that would be set up.
Older brother
types often condemn, judge, and act superior to younger brother
types, which reveals a sense
of pride, which is one
of the worst
types of sins, which means the older brothers are just as wayward as anyone else.
The point being that this
type of relationship between a man and man or woman and woman is forbidden by God and will be judged as
sin.
Emotional abuse --- religious concepts such as
sin, hell, cause feelings
of guilt, shame, fear, and other
types of emotional «baggage» which can scar the psyche for life.
Almost all Christians
of all
types believe that everybody
sins.
See it isn't about the
type of sin that «looses» salvation, or not doing works that make you good enough, or that you should constantly wonder if you are pleasing God enough, but that repentance is a part
of salvation.
It seems the most likely scenario is that he married his sister or less likely his niece.The reasoning is that Adam and Eve lived alot longer and continued to have sons and daughters GEN5: 4 aCTS 17:26 Paul tells us that the God who made the world hath made
of one blood all nations
of man to dwell on all the face
of the earth.Cain did nt marry to another tribe or nation as every man and women was a relative and
of the same bloodline
of Adam and Eve.The importance
of this is that
sin entered through one man Adam and is past through the bloodline so redemption is only possible through the same bloodline.So for the formula to work the human genome had to stay the same no other tribes or nations just the descendents
of Adam and Eve.It also solves another riddle in that satan at various times prior to the flood and after the flood tried to contaminate the bloodline by his angels having sexual relations with the women this created a
type of alien in essence and would have not been able to have been redeemed by the blood
of Jesus as it wasnt fully human.This is where the giants came from and why God wanted to destroy them as they had the potential to destroy the human race as they couldnt be redeemed by the blood
of Jesus.Interesting?
If you go through and read all the different sacrifices that are described in Leviticus and Deuteronomy for all the various
types of sin, you will see that God never provides a sacrifice for willful
sin.
Oh and getting to admit «
sin» is «wrong» is like me getting you to admit that burgundy is a
type of red.
If you are addicted to a certain
type or pattern
of sin in your life, God has 100 % forgiven you for this
sin.
He called upon the Church to «repent
of the
sins of existing society, cast off the spell
of lies protecting our social wrongs, have faith in a higher social order, and realize in ourselves a new
type of Christian manhood which seems to overcome the evil in the present world, not by withdrawing from the world, but by revolutionizing it.»
Do animals
of all
types have original
sin because the talking snake fvcked everything up for all the rest?
She also suggested that the transition from this life to the next may include some
type of «making up,» probably for her failures and
sins during life.
I think he is not necessarily bending but being honest that the christian community has a problem with those are gay and will attack that
sin but turn a blind eye to all
types of other
sins.
But as I have pointed out in my Gospel Dictionary course, in my book The Atonement
of God, and in numerous other places, there are two main
types of forgiveness
sin the Bible.
Yet both
sin and judgment are stark realities, and the most pervasive
type of sin lies in the complacency, lethargy, and moral dullness
of self - love at those points where both knowledge and freedom are available.
This
type of sin is the
sin of misusing the law.
The second general
type of sin named by Niebuhr was sensuality.
It is the
type of release or liberation we get when we gain freedom from the damaging and destructive power
of sin in our lives.
On that page, I explain that according to the book
of Hebrews, one reason Jesus came was to redeem
sin, and especially a certain kind
of sin, the parabainō
type of sin.
(In fact it's consistent with it, it would make sense for the God - man to encounter such
types of sin and then to be victorious over them, * unlike * us.)
The idea is that Jesus was tempted with all
types of human
sin, sexual, psychological, demonic, whatever, but that He triumphed over them.
Jesus grew, thirsted, hungered, was tired, was tempted by every
type of sin, was tortured, experienced every biological function
of the human body, and was killed.
Why is it that we can love and forgive some
types of sin, but not others?
«
sin» as an actual (Old Covenant - spirited -
type) LIST
of activities that are (basically) «against the law»...
We may rejoice that the pendulum is swinging back from the extremer forms
of liberalism to a
type which gives them a place, and that emphasis on the saving act
of God in Christ and forgiveness
of sin through the divine mercy is again theological doctrine in good standing.
«Matters
of the heart» are just as much willful
sin as any other
type of sin - and usually actions follow heart attitudes.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not
sinned in the likeness
of the offense
of Adam, who is a
type of Him who was to come.
The instruction in 1 John 1:9 to confess our
sins so that we might be forgiven is referring to a conditional
type of forgiveness which is not the same thing as God's free and unconditional forgiveness.
Human
sin is the reason for every war, murder, racism, hate, terrorism, rape and every
type of offense against another human being.
@Jaz - There is nothing wrong with a gay couple adopting a child, now if that gay couple was going to adopt a child and believed that all straight ppl were living a lifestyle that was considered evil and a
sin and were going to teach that
type of hatred to the child, then they should not be allowed to adopt, pretty simple logic that goes both ways.
Sure, we may gain «victory» over some
type of sin, but all we really end up doing is trading one
sin for another, and usually the other
sin is some sort
of religious self - righteousness, which is worse than the
sin we started with.
And the same should go for anyone who says they are saved if they are
sinning and letting everyone know it, which includes all sexual immorality, including having sex before a couple is married, drunkards, slanderers, gossips, thieves, swindlers, idolators, adulterers, and men who have sex with other men, etc... So ultimately, many Jesus followers accept certain
sin of all
types because they care more about what the world thinks, than what God thinks.
yes, the whole thing seems imbalanced toward pointing out one particular
type of behavior, ignoring and even overlooking many
of the
sins that Scripture talks about a lot.
It is a
type, a foreshadowing,
of the perfect sacrifice
of the Lamb
of God by which we are freed from
sin.
They wanted a fearless leader with a sword on a white stallion leading the charge (the
type of Messiah seen in Revelation), but clearly missed the point... His fight was to conquer
SIN, not specifically the Roman establishment.
Conflict can sometimes be creative, but hostility is a breeder
of many
types of sin.
Just as one should not love any
type of sin.