Not exact matches
One chance in 10 40,000, a possibility that even British
scientist Sir Fred Hoyle clearly recognized as impossible, with him once stating that this is «the same as the chance
of throwing an uninterrupted sequence
of 50,000 sixes with
unbiased dice!»
COMMUNICATION CHAOS Days
of conflicting reports and leaked documents have hit federal agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency hard, leaving
scientists worried about access to
unbiased scientific information.
... an
unbiased scientist shouldn't assume that dark matter isn't as interesting as ordinary matter and necessarily lacks a diversity
of matter similar to our own.»
Whitehead Institute
scientists performed an
unbiased screen in yeast cells that identifed dozens
of prion - like proteins.
After a decade
of frank internal discussions on global warming and conducting
unbiased studies on it, Exxon changed direction in 1989 and spent more than 20 years discrediting the research its own
scientists had once confirmed.
Do you want to believe their reports on the benefits
of eating animals or the
unbiased scientists?
I deny the use
of proxies that do not correlate with measured data I deny that all
scientist are
unbiased I deny that there is an explanation for how the first cell was formed.
It's impossible to construct an
unbiased sample
of «
scientists»?
By and large, this is how climate
scientists seem to have obtained their understanding
of the Hockey Stick debate — and here realclimate is hardly an
unbiased source.
This book will also appeal to
scientists who want a clear and
unbiased picture
of the global - warming problem and how it may progress in the future.
They should be staffed by
unbiased scientists or people
of knowledge.
Why on earth should one be sceptical
of unbiased, rigorous science when it's in the hands
of openly partisan
scientists?!!!
I was anticipating an informative
unbiased assessment
of Global Warming / Climate Change with new facts and involvement
of knowledgeable
scientists in the field.
I realise that there is no such thing as a Supreme Court
of Science, but you are in the academic world, and I would hope you would know some eminent,
unbiased,
scientists who would be prepared to «rule» on this issue.
Although
scientists are held up as models
of independent thinkers and
unbiased seekers
of truth, the reality is that they depend on funding even more than other professions, and will study what they are paid to study.
Climate gate has changed the debate from some independent
unbiased scientists giving us the straight goods, to a bunch
of political elites telling people how to live.
A singular lack
of reporting and enforcement has plagued the IWC from the start, and unfortunately,
scientists who most actively make recommendations concerning the stability
of whale stocks to the IWC are often far from
unbiased —
scientists often have political agendas, just like other people do.
«To make sure people form
unbiased perceptions
of what
scientists are discovering, it is necessary to use communication strategies that reduce the likelihood that citizens
of diverse values will find scientific findings threatening to their cultural commitments.»
How can that be considered compatible with the
unbiased role we expect
of scientists?
Ok, Let me see if I get this straight I'm supposed to consider your views completely
unbiased and
of equal merit to those
of scientists whose specialty is Climate Science and are currently engaged in research in this subject?