Sentences with phrase «of universe»

For the next 1,300 years, covering roughly the medieval age, the view of those pagan philosophers became the standard for the Roman church's explanation of the universe.

We do not know how the laws of the universe came to be, but I asure you that you do not explain anything at all by saying that a god wrote them.

Need I remind you that the expansion of the universe was only confirmed via Hobble telescope in the early 1990's?!

religion: 1: a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe 2: a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects 3: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith

Science writers Carl Sagan and Fritjof Capra have pointed out similarities between the latest scientific understanding of the age of the universe, and the Hindu concept of a «day and night of Brahma», which is much closer to the current known age of the universe than other creation myths.

Questions about the cause or nature of the universe then become entirely different subjects like philosophy and science.

Dark energy is energy that we can not see, it is intangible, yet it comprises of 75 % of the universe.

After all, you joined up with this whole Kingdom of God thing because of this relationship you could have with the life - giving Creator of the universe.

the nineteenth - century English philosopher Herbert Spencer has a chapter on «Ultimate Religious Ideas» in which he writes that, as regards the origin of the universe, three hypotheses are possible:

Atheist reject the idea of a god and believe their view to be true or they would be agnostic unless they choose no stance at all of a god that of which would require unknowing of what the term «god» means so it would fall under a belief and since they can't prove that a god doesn't exist then by definition it requires faith for their view, meaning it would effect their view of the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe if a god was proven to be true.

There is no creator of the universe and no god could have made this, nothing is that powerful, if so, strike me down now!!

Right, I mean, it isn't like we already have a bunch of other evidence indicating that carbon based life might somehow be specially relevant to the structure mechanism of the universe... * eyeroll *

If something has fine - tuned the parameters, that could indicate the existence of an intelligent fine - tuner — but this is pretty much guesswork: it could as easily be that the parameters vary slightly over very large distances, in which case life would be expected to turn up in those regions of the universe that are suited for life.

That means the actual origin of the universe is a big question - mark.

It took God more days to create earth than the rest of the universe.

Teilhard, of course, was suspected by some of deviating from Christian orthodoxy, and his notion of the «hominization» of the universe has been interpreted» unfairly, I think» as a truly relentless form of anthroprocentrism.

The beetle never can be intended here, as that insect never was eaten by man, perhaps, in any country of the universe.

We have no idea what is outside the boundary of our universe and probably never will.

Therefor we know for certain that the physical laws of our universe didn't exist, because our universe itself didn't.

Well, chaddy boy, if you can show me in the bible (the only source you have that tells you about god) where is says that god exists outside of time and space, that god runs the universe which is why the laws of the universe exists, and many other questions, I'll be more inclined to listen...

Also please list your sources for the statement «The fine - tunine of the universe for life has been clearly proven».

We all know the ruler of the universe is a man who lives alone (except for his cat which he names «The Lord») in a shack.

Probability, no matter how small, can be discounted when speaking in terms of billions of years, and an area the size of the universe.

In refusing to make an idol of humanity, some species of environmental thought make an idol of the universe itself.

I do not need a complete knowledge of the universe to prove to you that cubic spheres do not exist.

At one point Gravitational theory was bedrock, then low and behold after enough review and a more complete understanding of the universe, it is now theorized that what we see as gravity is simply the interaction of mass, space and time.

They'd see a picture of the universe as it could be.

This is not a violation of the second law because the entropy of the universe increases over all.

god: attributed with control of the universe and everything in it, but not so good with money.

There is only one God, the creator of the universe and mankind.

In fact... I would be greatly disturbed by the idea of the creator of the universe making sexual desire and attraction such a core part of our being, and then not being subject to those feelings Himself.

Centuries passed before Nicolaus Copernicus in the 1500s calculated that the earth was not the center of the universe.

He is the master of the universe and will judge every soul on the final day.

Taken as a whole they've made a very compelling argument that the explanations of the universe provided by both science and religion are incomplete and always evolving, and that one perspective is no more or less valid than another.

At no point did I condemn you for your view (unlike I received from some) only labeled it as a world view that in no way effects the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

That energy would then be free to interact with the rest of the universe as it did before being tied to one life form.

= > Now at least you're starting to acknowledge that the odds of the universe «just happening» are as remote as 100 monkeys banging out War and Peace.

Atheism says absolutely NOTHING about the cause, nature and purpose of universe, mankind or purposeness.

Furthermore, ecclesiastical leaders adopted the earth - centered view of the universe held by Ptolemy, an Egyptian - born astronomer of the second century.

Damocles «So this supposed deity can create all of the universe with a mere wave of its hand, yet seems to have a difficult time getting the idea cross that slavery is wrong?

The Bible and the universe Thus it was not the biblical perspective but the Greek view of the cosmos — in which everything revolved around a stationary earth — that was to guide man's concept of the universe for many centuries.

Theism IS a religion and the reason it affects the cause, nature and purpose of the universe is because all those things are contained in your Bible.

Maybe the truth is that the most efficient thing we can do would be to avail ourselves of the precious privilege of gaining wisdom and direction from the Creator of the universe.

first, i do agree that the creation of the universe from matter is completely explainable by science.

The basic materials of the universe simply popped into existence.

This is due to the fact that we understand the universe to be an unavoidable natural phenomena because the total energy of the universe is ZERO and this causes quantum particles to be active in a COMPLETELY EMPTY space.

How do you determine if thoughts and impressions are simply thoughts and impressions within your brain or are inserted by the creator of the universe?

With the esteemed position that the earth was at the center of the universe proven false, the church lost both prestige and credibility to emerging science.

So the rest of the universe is just sitting there for no other purpose than our ooh's and ahh's.

Past the electroweak epoch, coming up on the release of the CMB after nucleogenesis, physics describes the evolution of the universe remarkably well.