And your misguided interpretation that it means he will absolutely not discuss WBA displays only your ignorance
of usage of words.
Theologians influenced by positivism, whose adherents saw reality as strictly that which can be experienced through the senses and knowledge as that which can be obtained through a narrow definition of the scientific method, and linguistic analysis, which purported that the only proper function of philosophy is the study
of the usage of words and sentences, also treated science and religion as separate realms, distinct «language games,» each with its own set of rules.
Let's take note
of the usage of the word» hope» by the Boss.
Not exact matches
Trendspottr, co-founder and chief executive Mark Zohar explains, scours social media such as Twitter and Facebook as well as subscribers» corporate proprietary data for specific
words, language
usage, velocity
of mentions and acceleration to predict trending topics — before they actually trend.
After about 7.5 hours
of usage, which included a mix
of word processing, web browsing, light gaming and photo editing, the notebook went into sleep mode with roughly 5 %
of juice left.
In other
words, certain areas
of your shoe, depending upon its intended
usage (ie.
(Another possible cognate is the South African
usage of the
word tronk, for «jail.»)
It's the «
word of God» when it's a section / version that they want to shove down your throat, but God help you (ironic
usage intended) if you point out the numerous sections condoning murder, slavery, torture, subjugation
of women, etc..
god (s): Hebrew
word # 430 «elohiym (el - o - heem»); plural
of OT: 433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article)
of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way
of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: [
usages of the
word in the] KJV — angels, exceeding, God (gods)- dess, - ly), (very) great, judges, mighty.
That is a misunderstanding that many people assign to atheism, but has never actually been a part
of the
words usage (even in ancient times, atheists were those without god, while other terms were used to refer to those that BELIEVED there was no gods).
You need to keep count
of my
words to tell me how you have found that a certain
usage of words is therefore relevant and then you show your true self «and not care».
Instead
of accommodating its
usage» and so its ideas and assumptions» a translation
of Holy Scripture should serve the end
of conversion by employing principles that recognize Christianity as its own culture with its own language and practices, raising readers up and rooting them in a rich tradition
of translation, transforming them through the creative rationality, beauty, goodness, and truth reflective
of the triune God who speaks his
Word.
In the 2006 journal article, I studied the New Testament
usage of the
word «gospel» and ended up concluding that
They distort
words from their [proper]
usages and have forgotten a portion
of that
of which they were reminded.
For example: «It is truth that today's manly - made churches are in actualities a mimmickery
of wanting to establish mankinds» on and upon earth Christendoms being their idolized and adorned perceptions and variations...» This is probably one
of the worst
word usage I've ever seen.
Let us never use the
word «homosexual» in reference to a person, for it is a term that has become an epithet in the
usage of those who are biased against persons
of homosexual orientation.
Luther practically invented the modern
usage of the
word «vocation.»
In any case, the
word's
usage is closely associated with the more urgent and powerful emotions
of men.
I would point out however... that it is you who is claiming an absolute definition for the
word so, perhaps while you wait for my «exegetical evidence», you might provide a little
of your own substantiating your
usage of the term?
11 Note also that, as in the
usage of later classical prophetism, the
Word here conveys the sense
of a formula, a known formula, the content, nature, and potency
of which are widely familiar now.
For example, The Wolf
of Wall Street set a new record for «F»
word usage, according to Slate — used 544 times!
There is however no sharp difference in the
usage of this
word for love
of the brother, as against the love spoken
of as agape.
As the
word «religion» has, in popular
usage, become associated with an outdated supernatural world, we need to return to the original meaning
of the
word if there is to be any profitable discussion about the religion
of the future.
Now this variety
of usage in the biblical talk
of God (and modern scholarship has shown that the biblical statements can not all be neatly fitted together into a systematic whole, in the way some earlier Christian thinkers assumed that to be possible) makes it clear that the Bible is not wedded to any particular form
of words concerning God.
They could point to differences in terminology and
word usage, «errors»
of the text which «pre date» or «post date» the author, and why certain elements
of his book show clear evidence
of redaction and editing.
observernow As to God tempting someone it is a matter
of word usage.
The new Oxford English Dictionary neatly avoids the quicksand by attributing the
word to the Austrian psychiatrist Alfred Adler, citing as the only definition Adler's technical and specialized
usage, and then quoting a whole series
of uses
of the
word that owe nothing whatsoever to Adler.
Nor will he provide any examples
of what he believes is evidence so that we might better understand what he means by his redefined
word usage, which might be called babbling.
Try not to over speculate the writers
word usage but rather the over all meaning
of what the writer intended and that is, «Don't be Self - righteous.»
Already in Greek antiquity the
word «witness» had moved beyond its technical courtroom
usage and had come to mean the proclamation and exchange
of views held with conviction.
An adequate formulation or expression
of this, free from objections, is fraught with immense difficulty because
of the inevitable ambiguity
of words, which is not easy to eradicate even in technical
usage.
We must research the Greek and Hebrew and even beyond to the Acadian era and see how
words have changed and the literary
usage of words not only in religious writings but in extra-biblical and literary and common writings that relate to the scripture that we are interpreting.
I am glad to have Sherburne clarify his
usage of the two terms, but I regard it as unfortunate that the English translation
of the Greek
word should be taken to have a different meaning.
Closely related to this etymologically and in philosophical
usage is the
word «efficacy,» which in its primary sense refers to the power
of acting
of the kind
of entity I am discussing, but which also is used derivatively
of other entities.
As one dares enlightenment
of another's wordage
usages, one becomes such
word's judge and jury and executioner.
(MT 174) The
words «mystical,» «mystic,» and «mysticism» have had such a very colorful and diverse history
of usage in both the East and the West that it is not an easy matter to determine...
Any other
usage, it is claimed, violates «the ethics
of words.
There are other
words and concepts which could replace it in certain areas
of its
usage, such as «vindication», «exaltation», «ascension», etc., but because the Easter message is essentially concerned with the death
of Jesus, we would be hard pressed to find another idiom which acknowledges the significance
of his death equally as well.
Moreover, the use
of the
word «absolute» is itself problematic because that
usage introduces the distinction between absolute and finite, a distinction with strong Hellenistic overtones.
However, modern
usage of the
word means the unfolding
of the Scripture message in terms
of the modern setting.
To reiterate what has been said before, the one reality and event expressed by each «
usage»
of the one Roman Rite is much more beautiful and profound than any
words can express.
Charles Peirce said this in his twenties with superb clarity, except that finitude is in this
usage an inadequate
word; we are but fragments
of the finite cosmos, which so far as we know is itself finite.
The contemporary NEED to be tolerant and not the traditional
usage of the
word (accepting that someone else's view be heard) we have a new definition which is framed as being only able to say that their claim is as valid as any other.
Look up the
usage of the
word theory in the scientific community.
In his economics, Kirk could be quite critical
of capitalism (which was, as he always pointed out in his characteristic solicitude for proper
usage, a Marxist
word) as a political ideology, and for libertarians he had no use at all.
David shares what's on his mind and instead
of giving him the benefit
of the doubt we hammer him about
word usage and phrasing.
The
word comes from the Greek adjective eschatos, meaning «last,» frequently used in the New Testament (as in II Timothy3: 1,»... in the last days there will come times
of stress,» but also in such familiar
usage as Matthew 19:30: «But many that are first will be last, and the last first»).
The Latin
word resurrectio appears to have been created for Christian use, and while the Greek equivalent anastasis is certainly pre-Christian, it does not seem to have been widely used until Christian times, some scholars thinking that, when Paul referred to it at Athens, his hearers mistook it for the name
of a goddess.26 The idea
of resurrection first came to expression in the form
of a narrative, and until the advent
of the above technical terms,
words of very general
usage, such as «raise», «wake up», «stand up», etc., served the purpose
of relating it.
============== Faith has essentially two accepted
usages in the English language; atheists In this case discard «A» over «B», then attack Christians in that context only, making a further critical and purposeful redefinition
of the
word «faith», claiming that proof obviates it.
I can not think
of another place in the Bible where we find this
usage of the
word «today.»