Sentences with phrase «of value of the importing»

Under NAFTA, 62.5 percent of the value of an imported vehicle must originate in Canada, Mexico or the United States for that vehicle to get duty - free access to the region.

Because of the rules of provision and demand, bringing in more than transporting will probably cause a loss of value of the importing country «s currency.

It collaborates with Care & Fair — an organization created with the goal of eradicating child labour in the carpet industry in countries like India, Pakistan and Nepal — to which it donates 1 % of the value of its imports from India.»

Not exact matches

Using these value - added data, Flatness and Rasmussen calculated that the U.S. share of automobile imports — in other words, the amount of American made parts in cars and trucks imported from Canada and Mexico — dropped to about 12 per cent in 2011 from about 19 per cent in 1995.

His researchers dug deeper and determined that China's share of value - added automotive imports from Canada and Mexico had also grown significantly.

China's share of value - added in U.S. automobile imports rose to 7.3 per cent in 2011 from almost nothing in 1995.

So if you were to impose a tariff on all good imported overseas to drive up the value of the dollar, it would be the Chinese that would end up paying the biggest portion of the bill building the wall between U.S. and Mexico, and not the Mexicans.

Nor is core as hot as it looks on paper, he said; the decline in the value of the dollar from a year ago is making imports more expensive.

The meeting was held before Trump instructed officials to consider tariffs on an additional $ 100 billion in Chinese imports, bringing the value of the nation's products set for higher duties to about $ 150 billion.

If you match these volumes up with a comparison of landed costs of similar crude import streams into the U.S. vs. the prices of Canadian crudes, you can get a sense for the foregone value.

It lost over 11 % of its trade - weighted value in the four months that followed, forcing up the price of imports.

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

The combination of 12 % import taxes and 17 % value - added taxes on foreign manufactures continue to frustrate exporters, so do your high - volume, low - tech production in China.

Business Insider recently looked at each state's biggest international trading partners as measured by value of goods exported and imported in 2016.

Beijing said last week it may target 128 U.S. products with an import value of $ 3 billion in response to the steel and aluminum import duty.

To help you keep them straight, we've graphed the relative value of every deal — whether it's in force, announced or in negotiation — along with each country's largest import from Canada and its largest export to us.

The export bounce is, at face value, a sign that China's modest economic revival is intact and suggestive of global demand being on the mend, but imports were surprisingly weak, falling 15.2 percent from a year earlier to 13 - month lows and highlighting vulnerability lurking in the domestic economy.

Finally, Brazil imposes a flat import tax of 60 percent on the cost of merchandise valued up to $ 3,000.

Depending on the item, the new tariff will be 5 or 6 per cent of an imported good's value, likely leading to an equivalent increase in the retail price for consumers.

That's far more than the $ 7 billion combined value of fresh fruit (excluding bananas) and vegetables imported annually from Mexico.

I've read somewhere that the nature of some of these trade imbalances is the way US companies account for these imports i.e. Apple iPhones are imported at the full RETAIL value as opposed to true manufacturing cost.

So they represent the quantity of beer exported, and quantity of pizza imported, not the values.

The terms of trade is influenced by the exchange rate because a rise in the value of a country's currency lowers the domestic prices for its imports but does not directly affect the commodities it produces (i.e. its exports).

These are stats that include the value of exports from a country, say Canada, that were first imported from another country, say China, before being re-exported to another, like the U.S..

In the last two years, for the first time, the value of U.S. energy exports to Mexico (mainly petroleum products) has been greater than the value of energy imports from Mexico (mostly crude oil).

That works out to 67 percent of the value of Canada's total merchandise trade surplus with the U.S. of about C$ 76 billion — and 41 percent of U.S. crude oil imports in 2016.

Last year alone, the value of U.S. energy exports to Mexico ($ 20 billion) was more than double the value of its energy imports from Mexico ($ 8.7 billion).

Gross domestic product (GDP): The total value of goods and services produced by the economy, the sum of aggregate consumption, investment, government purchases, and exports, less the value of imports.

Debt - financed tax cuts may well push up interest rates in the U.S., which attracts more foreign investment, which raises the value of the dollar, which makes exports less competitive and imports cheaper, which increases the trade deficit.

Of all the goods in this product group, the US imported (by value) from China.

While the average import price of an European - made handbag far exceeds that of a Chinese one — $ 289 for Italian, $ 358 for Spanish, $ 884 for French — other top US suppliers produce bags valued more similarly to China's ($ 43).

The strong increase in export receipts, however, has been matched by solid growth in the value of imports.

However, an increase in import values of around 3 1/2 per cent in the March quarter, despite another decline in prices, points to a further rapid expansion in import volumes.

The current account deficit widened to 6.2 per cent of GDP in the June quarter as export values fell more than imports (Graph 27).

In contrast to the strength in volumes, the value of total imports declined by around 5 per cent over the year to the December quarter, as the currency appreciation has lowered Australian dollar import prices.

The value of imports of goods and services rose again in the June quarter, to be around 20 per cent higher than a year earlier.

The study, based on Trade in Value Added data recently released by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, shows that between 1995, the year after NAFTA went into effect, and 2011, U.S. content of manufactured goods imported from Canada dropped significantly — from 21 percent to 15 percent.

But even though Trump attaches meaning to irrelevant metrics like bilateral trade deficits in a global economy, where two - thirds of trade flows are intermediate goods and only 3.6 % of the value of an Apple iPhone is Chinese (yet the entire $ 179 cost is chalked up as an import from China, exacerbating the bilateral deficit), the fact is that frictions in the relationship have been increasing since well before this president assumed office.

When the dollar declines relative to the value of foreign currencies, the prices of imports rise.

Eighty per cent of Canadian exports to these countries are raw or semi-processed goods (e.g. beef, coal, lumber) while 80 % of imports are high value - added goods (e.g. autos, machinery, computer and electrical components).

Among other things, the U.S. would import higher inflation, interest rates would rise, and the value of U.S. assets held by foreigners would shrink.

In the May 23 piece, Pearson argues, «The real cost of import restrictions is the harm they do to manufacturers of value - added products that use steel as an input.»

However, given the sharp declines in import prices, the value of imports has fallen over 2003 as a whole.

In the March quarter, the value of imports appears likely to have risen by around 2 1/2 per cent, with strong growth in import volumes and lower prices owing to a further appreciation of the Australian dollar.

Both exports and imports picked up strongly in value terms in the first two months of 1997 before falling substantially in March (Graph 15).

Values of imports and exports soared, rising by around 50 per cent over the year to December as firms rushed to fill export orders ahead of the cut in export rebates on 1 January 2004 (Graph 9).

In value terms, though, imports have fallen by around 5 3/4 per cent since the end of 2002, reflecting a substantial fall in import prices due to the Australian dollar's appreciation.

The total value of U.S. trade with China was $ 599 billion in 2015, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, of which $ 116 billion was exports to China from U.S. producers, while U.S. companies imported $ 483 billion in goods from China.

Shares of Boeing, the largest U.S. exporter by value, have dropped more than 8 percent since their high on February 27, following announced U.S. tariffs on imported steel and aluminum and China's plan to levy as much as 25 % on American - made aircraft.

And we still think that the consumer is looking for national brands, in a lot of cases, but also great value in our private brand offerings, which really goes toward that import piece.