Sentences with phrase «of view of faith»

Approached from the point of view of faith rather than of works, the question ceases to be «What constitutes a breach of divine law in the sexual realm?»

«Republicans and white evangelicals overwhelmingly back Romney irrespective of their views of his faith,» the report said, «and Democrats and seculars overwhelmingly oppose him regardless of their impression.»

Not exact matches

We are also pleased to see that the CSA, IIROC and MFDA may view refusals or low ball offers as an indication of problems with a registered firm's complaint handling practices including their obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with clients, act within the applicable standard of care, or have implemented and maintained effective complaint handling procedures.

Yet the markets have dismissed all these risks, in our view because of investor faith in central banks.

Directors may find that they face a tension between the desire to consider additional stakeholder interests beyond traditional shareholders as per B Corporation requirements and their legal duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of a «corporation» under both the Canada Business Corporations Act (the «CBCA») and Business Corporations Act (Ontario)(the «OBCA»).

What Ted has done is give a Taliban «ish scenario and attempted to portray any one that is of Faith as carrying such views.

Not among those who use «religious faith» as a political weapon and sanctimoniously refer to themselves as the moral ones and the rest of us who do not agree with their ignorant and distorted view of things as immoral.

That is one of my favorite words to use here because to so many Atheist, all of us who are of Faith, are «lockstep» in our views and beliefs.

You appear to not be a person of Faith and who knows you might be and just have a different view but Ted, every politician does this and Bachmann is no different.

The original credo of our nation set by our founding fathers of «E Pluribus unum» (from many, one — or from many walks of life, faith, world views, we unite as one nation) has turned into «One Nation Under [a Christian] God.»

I don't think the faith issue should absolutely dominate however, a complete holistic view of the candidate needs to be considered.

On the same point, I know many, many people of faith who do not «force» their views on others, yet instead use their faith as their guiding principle to share love, kindness, and goodness to others.

Their faith and view of how to apply that faith does.

Thanks to Harry Knox for sharing a view shared by many more Americans of faith than we know through the popular press, and thanks to CNN.com for hosting this forum and bringing more voices into the mix.

Sure, their motives were good, but if you yourself are a person of faith, would you want someone initiating you (posthumously, so clearly without your authorization) into a religion with views incompatible with your own?

But they try to make it look like it is about «belief» in the sense of faith (in a deity or non faith in a deity) and as often as not it is about political views (beliefs) and elections and politicians (and nothing to do with deity).

I am making the «belief in no god» a concept that a Atheist (not a Agnostic Atheist) would view as true but can not prove so their view would fall under the definition of faith.

I spend years in Apologetics and arrived at rational basis for my Christian faith, defend the faith against objections, and expose the perceived flaws of other world views.

Philippians 3:8,9 «More than that, I count all things to be loss in view of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them but rubbish so that I may gain Christ, and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith,»

Best of all, she suggests that people of faith do themselves and others a disservice when they use the bible selectively to bolster their arguments for specific political views and lifestyle prescriptions, using it «as a blunt weapon», as she puts it.

Dude, are you Tom Cruise, or do you just need to profess your view of someone you don't knows faith that's not your own?

Regardless of your views, I still have my personal faith, you may condemn me as simple minded or living in a fantasy world, but having witnessed first hand good triumphing over evil, I shall leave you to decide your own journey in life.

They should denigrate those of different views and faiths.

If this is the case, then, given what Warfield says about professionalization and faith healing, it seems he does think that it introduces a Catholic view of the priesthood into Protestantism.

- But the difference is, Science eventually comes to its senses in the face of TESTABLE EVIDENCE and changes it's views; the thought of changing away from religious dogma is abhorrant to almost all faiths, and change in practices often take much time.

Atheist reject the idea of a god and believe their view to be true or they would be agnostic unless they choose no stance at all of a god that of which would require unknowing of what the term «god» means so it would fall under a belief and since they can't prove that a god doesn't exist then by definition it requires faith for their view, meaning it would effect their view of the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe if a god was proven to be true.

Ford's novels often address the incidental attributes of English Catholicism, especially its connection with what Ker calls «feudal Toryism,» but the essential drama of faith remains out of view.

Belief in God would mean you (again, not you personally but in general) believe God has everything to do with the universe it can't be proven so requires faith but if God was proven to not exist it would effect your view of cause, nature, and purpose of the universe....

Your comment is interesting because in the midst of begging for respect for your own views and claiming to respect the views of atheists you imply without faith or the «spirit» they lack strength, will, a positive outlook, morality and a desire to do good.

In view of the number of specific prophetic events that were fortold and have come about exactly as fortold, your position requires more faith to believe it is a fairy tale than mine to believe that there is someone (God) who knows the future and told us the future.

As one believer explained, «To turn again to the cares, perplexities, and dangers of life, in full view of jeering and reviling unbelievers who scoffed as never before, was a terrible trial of faith and patience.

Secularization, the view that human beings are collections of atoms, sexual freedom, the scramble for wealth, careerism — these are facts that infiltrate everywhere, including our souls, making the beauty of an integrated life of faith elusive, difficult, and rare.

Also how does your view of faith relate to other people's faith?

As I imagine is similar in other faiths, it is hard for an active member of the LDS Church to publically maintain political views that fall more in line with the Democratic Party than the GOP.

I understand «Pascal's Wager» very well, but it is taken from a philosophical (man's earthly) point of view, mine is not... mine is taken from a point of faith.

No amount of evidence will convince religious people to change their views because they are based on faith not logic.

The bad part was the sense of shame some Christians made me feel about my emotional struggles, but as I discovered how God views healing, I realized it wasn't my faith that was flawed; it was their views toward mental health and faith.

They view the questions that rise in their minds as evidence of a lack of faith, which surely disqualifies them from being authentic believers.

4, Is it possible for a community to be composed of people of all kinds of levels of faith and even of no faith at all, or for those who hold a vastly differing views of scripture to keep fellowship?

it was made by those of the christain faith to fulfill their world view.

Its presence there, however mistakenly justified, serves as a continuing corrective particularly to ascetic Christian tendencies, and to an otherworldly view of Scripture and biblical faith in general.

Your open minded views (and lack of faith) allow evil forces to persuade you to accept what God has never intended to be acceptable.

millions of people have been put to death over opposing views of either Christianity, Islam or some other «faith».

There is widespread agreement with the view presented in the article on homosexuality in Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics (edited by Carl F. Henry [Baker Book House, 1973]-RRB-, which declares that «those who base their faith on the OT and NT documents can not doubt that their strong prohibitions of homosexual behavior make homosexuality a direct transgression of God's law.»

Apparent «miracles» are viewed as concrete examples of proof, which oddly enough contradicts a «perfect» faith.

@Delsin: I see your point of view, but until there is absolute solid proof that demons exist, putting your faith in exorcism to cure issues is unwise to say the least.

At Bryan College — a school named for a man who is best known for opposing evolution — some members of the faculty objected to a statement of faith that outlined a literal view of creation.

Jesus» original disciples likely never thought of him as anything more than a great rabbi, and some might have thought him a good rallying point for a revolt, they could have even whispered that he was anointed by God, but the idea of his being divine only seems to enter into the gospels around the time many Greek educated folks had converted, bringing their own views of what a «son of God» means into the faith.

Faith as addressing issues beyond the scope of rationality: In this view, faith is seen as covering issues that science and rationality are inherently incapable of addressing, but that are nevertheless entirely Faith as addressing issues beyond the scope of rationality: In this view, faith is seen as covering issues that science and rationality are inherently incapable of addressing, but that are nevertheless entirely faith is seen as covering issues that science and rationality are inherently incapable of addressing, but that are nevertheless entirely real.

I wish Bell luck, I hope he finds faith in humanity and in good deeds regardless of his view on God.