Sentences with phrase «of views on global warming»

When asked whether his relationship with Emanuel has changed because of their views on global warming, Lindzen said opaquely in an e-mail, «That is a complicated question.»

Having listened with great respect, but some puzzlement to Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT's cogent expression of his views on global warming, two public spirited and authentically skeptical graduates of that institution opted a few years ago to fund a Red Team exercise of their own.

Critics are already suggesting that Griffin was installed because of his views on global warming by the Bush administration.

So, I can't comment on the latest specifics of their views on global warming.

Not exact matches

Two years ago, Asness and an AQR colleague raised hackles with a research paper that argued that the global temperature trends over the last 125 years do not, on their own, support an alarmist view of global warming.

The entire enterprise is very American, calling to mind other «scientific» revolts against elitist views — on global warming, say, or the dangers of tobacco.

Opponents of taking action on global warming will point to former Massachusetts governor and 2012 candidate for President Mitt Romney's recent statement that he accepts the scientific view held by the bulk of the world's climate scientists that human activity is contributing to global warming.

Three years ago, for example, Texas revised its science teaching standards to require that students «analyse and evaluate different views on the existence of global warming».

Democrats tackle Willie Soon It was arguably to block climate change regulation that Congress invited Soon — and other scientists skeptical of the mainstream view on global warming — to testify.

«The listing not only raised public awareness that climate change is already driving vulnerable species like the polar bear toward extinction, but also forced the Bush administration to adopt the consensus view of the world's scientists on global warming.»

Launch of World Wide Views Global Citizen Consultation Results Report on Climate and Energy Strong Public Support for Political Leaders to Commit to Ambitious Climate Action Now The COP 21 Paris Agreement Needs to Open a Credible Path to Limit Global Warming to No More than 2 Degrees Celsius Citizens worldwide have given their leaders -LSB-...]

Gore's sobering view of global warming Former Vice President Al Gore's latest treatise on global warming, An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It , is a companion volume to the well - received documeglobal warming Former Vice President Al Gore's latest treatise on global warming, An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It , is a companion volume to the well - received documwarming Former Vice President Al Gore's latest treatise on global warming, An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It , is a companion volume to the well - received documeglobal warming, An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It , is a companion volume to the well - received documwarming, An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It , is a companion volume to the well - received documeGlobal Warming and What We Can Do About It , is a companion volume to the well - received documWarming and What We Can Do About It , is a companion volume to the well - received documentary.

(The Yale Project on Climate Change Communication has done a lot of work revealing how powerfully such cultural and ideological predispositions shape views of the phenomenon too loosely called «global warming.»)

The now conventional view on global warming, as stated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is that most of the warming recorded in the past 50 years has been caused by emissions of manmade greenhouse gases.

All I'm saying is that it's a reasonable way of looking at the facts, and trying too strenously to refute it is perhaps not the best way to convert reasonable newbies to the subject to consensus views on global warming.

Gary aggregated the scientific research, accompanied by his rich photographs, into one of the first photographic books on climate change, «Earth Under Fire: How Global Warming is Changing the World,» and launched a website, «World View of Global Warming.»

There is a gaping gap, in my view, between several things, perhaps best stated this way: If the large majority of scientists are correct on global warming, and if the Times genuinely means what it says in its occasional editorials on the subject, then the coverage of the issue in the news pages is clearly way below the task, and way off - mark.

And, I'd like to point out (once again) that months ago another Dot Earthling suggested that the Times should do a brief survey of all U.S. Congresspersons to determine their views on global warming and policy solutions.

Despite a long string of years in which Republican leaders and candidates bashed global warming science, the platform adopted on July 18 has no section characterizing — one way or the other — the party's view of risks from an unabated buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

They're implying that settling on a global warming policy (or the lack of it) is somehow special, somehow a matter of science and economics and politics that stands apart from one's world view or ethics or religious beliefs.

The New York Times Magazine is running a long profile of Freeman Dyson, the independent - minded physicist and polymath from Princeton, N.J., who has come into the public eye of late because of his anti-consensual views of global warming — which are also different from the views of many people in the variegated assemblage of climate skeptic / denier / realists (depending on who is describing them) fighting efforts to curb greenhouse gases.

Global warming from the ongoing buildup of human - generated greenhouse gases is almost certainly contributing to the ice retreats, a host of Arctic experts now agree, although they hold a range of views on how much of the recent big ice retreats is due to human activities.

I first dug in on behavioral and social science research related to global warming views and responses in 2006, and it quickly became clear that this was the scariest body of science of all — topping ice - sheet instability and even calling into question the utility of my profession.

Again, I'll update this post when Lewis offers an explanation of why his views on global warming research and risk have so starkly changed.

The highlighted points of emphasis in the report have been the dominant focus of research in the field of science communication and science studies for the past 15 years and the basis for recent innovative projects such as the World Wide Views on Global Warming initiative.

If Mann had wanted to point to an opposite end to the spectrum of ways in which scientists can contribute to public discourse on global warming science and risks, a better choice (in my view) would have been Susan Solomon's handling of the rollout of the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

In the talk, Victor, trained in political science, warns against focusing too much on trying to defeat those denying the widespread view that greenhouse - driven climate change is a clear and present danger, first explaining that there are many kind of people engaged at that end of the global warming debate — including camps he calls «shills» (the professional policy delayers), «skeptics» (think Freeman Dyson) and «hobbyists.»

But, as is so clear in considering the interface of science and society on a host of tough issues — from nanotechnology and synthetic biology to global warming — the views of the average person, let alone an elderly folkie, do matter.

Fresh analysis from a research group tracking voter views on global warming shows the country's range of attitudes sloshing more than surging.

«Why does the urban influence on our global analysis seem to be so small, in view of the large urban warming that we find at certain locations (section 5)?

· A majority of all registered voters (55 percent) say they will consider candidates» views on global warming when deciding how to vote.

a cadre of scientists who share the industry's views of climate science and to train them in public relations so they can help convince journalists, politicians and the public that the risk of global warming is too uncertain to justify controls on greenhouse gases, â??

I am shocked by the reality of where we are and what we are faced with: global warming, climate change, poverty... The articles show us different perspectives, even divergent views, which promote us to come up with our own ideas about the meaning and vision of sustainability... It's time for us to take responsibility on our shoulders... We can make a big difference together.»

But the newly obtained documents show that Dr. Carlin's highly skeptical views on global warming, which have been known for more than a decade within the small unit where he works, have been repeatedly challenged by scientists inside and outside the E.P.A.; that he holds a doctorate in economics, not in atmospheric science or climatology; that he has never been assigned to work on climate change; and that his comments on the endangerment finding were a product of rushed and at times shoddy scholarship, as he acknowledged Thursday in an interview.

One group had to defend Susan Solomon, the much lauded atmospheric scientist who, while a co-leader of the 2007 science assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, staunchly refused to provide her personal view of the implications of global warming research despite the prodding of reporters.

So, while most people receive their education on global warming and alternative energy through mainstream media, they are only learning one point of view (which leads to these so - called information cascades, which to me, is a $ 10 word for the fact that most people are misinformed of the whole picture).

Whatever your own personal views are about global warming, pro or con, or just sitting on the fence in the middle of the debate, you should know this: there is not much time left.

My point is this: In my view, the Times should find out, and convey to the public (in one place and in organized fashion), the views of each and every Congressperson, and person running for Congress, regarding a moratorium on coal - fired power plants (until their carbon dioxide emissions can be eliminated), a carbon «cap - and - auction» or «cap - and - trade» system, or carbon tax, and related matters having to do with global warming.

First: Months ago, as you know, a very creative and conscientious Dot Earthling (Anna Haynes) suggested in a Dot Earth post that The New York Times should do a survey / questionnaire of all members of Congress regarding their specific views on global warming and potential ways to address global warming.

It is my view that policy makers (at least the ones that matter) will actually understand the technical aspects of global warming, and if they don't, they will seek out someone on their staff to explain it to them.

As I've asserted many times, views on global warming seem like water sloshing in a shallow pan — a lot of movement, no depth (and thus no determination to act).

The Wall Street Journal has just published «Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate,» a rebuttal from a long list of climate researchers criticizing last week's much - discussed 16 - author op - ed article titled «No Need to Panic About Global Warming.»

:: Center for American Progress via:: CNet More on global warming effects Dangerous effects of global warming on Earth The Worst Effect of Global Warming So Far...:: The Center for American Progress» Top 100 Effects of Global Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat Yourglobal warming effects Dangerous effects of global warming on Earth The Worst Effect of Global Warming So Far...:: The Center for American Progress» Top 100 Effects of Global Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat Youwarming effects Dangerous effects of global warming on Earth The Worst Effect of Global Warming So Far...:: The Center for American Progress» Top 100 Effects of Global Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat Yourglobal warming on Earth The Worst Effect of Global Warming So Far...:: The Center for American Progress» Top 100 Effects of Global Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat Youwarming on Earth The Worst Effect of Global Warming So Far...:: The Center for American Progress» Top 100 Effects of Global Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat YourGlobal Warming So Far...:: The Center for American Progress» Top 100 Effects of Global Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat YouWarming So Far...:: The Center for American Progress» Top 100 Effects of Global Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat YourGlobal Warming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat YouWarming Two Views on the Effects of Global Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat YourGlobal Warming Global Warming Wants to Eat YouWarming Global Warming Wants to Eat YourGlobal Warming Wants to Eat YouWarming Wants to Eat Your Flesh

Here's an incomplete list of other interesting views on both the climate files and the coverage of them (or lack thereof) by the media, along with some stray tidbits, including a report on Copenhagen prostitutes fighting the city's efforts to clean up ahead of the talks and a classic case of potential scientific overreach in a story on how global warming may make sharks more aggressive:

David Appell has filed a thorough survey of research and scientists» views on recent temperature fluctuations and climate sensitivity at Yale Climate Media Forum — «W [h] ither Global Warming: Has it Slowed Down?»

The Times had a big opportunity to seek specific global warming - oriented views from all members of Congress, and to report on the matter to readers, and it hasn't happened.

Unsurprisingly, the survey confirmed climate change to be a largely politicized issue, viewed too often along party lines instead of according to factual analysis (and both parties are guilty of this, in different ways — there are plenty of liberals who proclaim their allegiance to the fight against global warming without a basic education on the issue).

Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political «cause» rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.

The vast majority of liberals and conservatives, despite being polarized on whether global warming is occurring, also have largely the same impression of what climate scientists» view of the risks that global warming poses.

Nearly a year after NASA climatologist James Hansen accused federal officials of censoring his views on global warming, scientific freedom is shaping up as a key issue for the next Congress, Environment & Energy Daily reported in its # 1 story... Continue reading →