Not exact matches
When scientists use climate models for attribution studies, they first run simulations with estimates
of only «natural» climate
influences over the past 100 years, such as changes in solar output and major
volcanic eruptions.
The site where Loki is heavily
influenced by
volcanic activity, but actually quite low in temperature,» says Steffen Jørgensen from the University
of Bergen in Norway, who was involved in taking the samples where Loki was found.
These results, which you can read all about in the journal Nature Geoscience, reveal the
influence of surface processes — largely controlled by climate — on
volcanic activity.
Although the rate
of subduction varies little along the entire arc, there are complex changes in the geologic processes along the subduction zone that dramatically
influence volcanic activity, crustal deformation, earthquake generation and occurrence all along the western edge
of South America.
The
volcanic activity may be
influenced by the gravitational pulls
of neighboring Ganymede and Europa.
In years
influenced by
volcanic eruptions, Nile flooding was generally diminished, leading to social stress that could trigger unrest and have other political and economic consequences,» says Joseph Manning, lead author on the paper and the William K. & Marilyn Milton Simpson Professor
of History and Classics at Yale.
Their findings: natural
influences such as changes in the amount
of sunlight or
volcanic eruptions did not explain the warming trends, but the results matched when increasing levels
of greenhouse gas emissions were added to the mix.
However, these studies failed to account for the comprehensive set
of geological variables that change over time,
influencing the
volcanic history.
Molten rock (or magma) has a strong
influence on our planet and its inhabitants, causing destructive
volcanic eruptions and generating some
of the giant mineral deposits.
But despite that steady climb, not every year is warmer than the one before it, thanks to the vagaries
of weather, the
influence of natural climate cycles, and the effects
of events like
volcanic eruptions.
A new study has found geochemical clues near the summit
of volcanic Mauna Kea that tell a story
of ancient glacier formation, the
influence of the most recent ice age, more frequent major storms in Hawaii, and the impact
of a distant climatic event that changed much
of the world.
2000, except that they used a large forcing for solar (10x) and
volcanic (5x) in separate runs to see if the relative
influence of both may need to be adjusted, as the Hadcm3 model possibly underestimates the — relative — weaker forcings.
For
volcanic, there may be some overestimating
of historical
influences, as the
influence of temperature and reduced solar input (less insolation) on tree rings is hardly to separate.
It is also well known that
volcanic activity has a cooling
influence, and as is well documented by the effects
of the 1991 Mount Pinatubo
volcanic eruption.
By comparing
volcanic activity to records
of social unrest, the researchers found a correlation between the two that was too closely matched to dismiss: «In years
influenced by
volcanic eruptions, Nile flooding was generally diminished, leading to social stress that could trigger unrest and have other political and economic consequences,» Manning said.
Over the last 30 years
of direct satellite observation
of the Earth's climate, many natural
influences including orbital variations, solar and
volcanic activity, and oceanic conditions like El Nino (ENSO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) have either had no effect or promoted cooling conditions.
Additional eruptions added from tree ring data reported in Table 2
of Briffa, KR, PD Jones, FH Schweingruber & TJ Osborn, 1998,
Influence of volcanic eruptions on Northern hemisphere summer temperature over the past 600 years: Nature 393, 450 - 455.
Volcanoes can — and do —
influence the global climate over time periods
of a few years but this is achieved through the injection
of sulfate aerosols into the high reaches
of the atmosphere during the very large
volcanic eruptions that occur sporadically each century.
The uncertainty in the overall amplitude
of the reconstruction
of volcanic forcing is also important for quantifying the
influence of volcanism on temperature reconstructions over longer periods, but is difficult to quantify and may be a substantial fraction
of the best estimate (e.g., Hegerl et al., 2006a).
This interactive engaging NGSS STEM unit covers NGSS Standards: 5 - ESS2 - 1 Develop a model that demonstrates how the environment, earthquakes,
volcanic action and glaciers
influenced the formation
of Yosemite Valley.
Additional eruptions added from tree ring data reported in Table 2
of Briffa, KR, PD Jones, FH Schweingruber & TJ Osborn, 1998,
Influence of volcanic eruptions on Northern hemisphere summer temperature over the past 600 years: Nature 393, 450 - 455.
And relative to 2008 - 18, the extra 0.1 ppm / yr in the previous decades would be more than cloaked by
volcanic influences of the 1980s & 90s.
But, as Todd in # 23 points out, 1984 could have been affected by the El Chichon eruption which means that the early part
of the 1984 - 2008 period was affected by 2
volcanic eruptions which must
influence the trend.
by removing the
influence of exogenous factors like el Nino,
volcanic eruptions, and solar variation (or at least, approximations
of their
influence) we can reduce the noise level in temperature time series (and reduce the level
of autocorrelation in the process).
The climate system evolves in time under the
influence of its own internal dynamics and because
of external forcings such as
volcanic eruptions, solar variations and human - induced forcings such as the changing composition
of the atmosphere and land - use change.»
Any change in the strength
of natural (
volcanic, solar)
influences based on historical variations will have an opposite effect on the
influence of greenhouse gases, and thus on man - made emissions.
For
volcanic, there may be some overestimating
of historical
influences, as the
influence of temperature and reduced solar input (less insolation) on tree rings is hardly to separate.
As the Shindell paper shows: the
influence of volcanic is within the modelled unforced variability, except for Europe, where it is outside, but with the wrong sign -LRB-!)
2000, except that they used a large forcing for solar (10x) and
volcanic (5x) in separate runs to see if the relative
influence of both may need to be adjusted, as the Hadcm3 model possibly underestimates the — relative — weaker forcings.
A fingerprinting study
of the ocean data, compared to GHG / aerosols, ice volumes, solar variance and
volcanic influences may give some more insight...
The decay times
of volcanic aerosols are approximately exponential, though there are seasonal and geographic
influences *; Observations vary from ~ 5 to 95 months for 1 / e; eruption durations vary from week to decades; the mean time between VEI 4 eruptions is 18 months.
In (b) the individual contributions
of these
influences are shown, namely ENSO (purple),
volcanic aerosols (blue), solar irradiance (green) and anthropogenic effects (red).
But while the graph was only for SST (sea surface temperature, something different
of SAT — surface air temperature, even at sea), the
influence of the solar cycle and
volcanic episodes (El Chicon and Pinatubo) is visible globally in the oceans until a depth
of 300 m in the Levitus data.
Re # 92:... reconstructions based only on tree rings may overestimate the
influence of volcanic eruptions, as not only the temperature is reduced, but there is also a change in direct and diffuse incoming sunlight...
-- But if the (negative)
influence of aerosols (and
volcanic) is overestimated, the modeled trend would be way too high.
Then you actually need to be able to say something about how climate change will
influence El Nino, and by studying the past relationship between El Nino and natural factors like
volcanic eruptions we could potentially better inform our understanding
of how the El Nino phenomenon will respond to climate change.
If one takes the MBH98 / 99 reconstruction as base, the variation in the pre-industrial period was ~ 0.2 K,
of which less than 0.1 K (in average) from
volcanic eruptions, the rest mostly from solar (I doubt that land use changes had much
influence on global temperatures).
If more recent proxies are used (Esper, Moberg, bore hole reconstructions), the
influence of volcanic in the total variability reduces to ~ 14 %, instead
of 50 %.
For the period 1950 to 2005, it is exceptionally unlikely that the combined natural RF (solar irradiance plus
volcanic aerosol) has had a warming
influence comparable to that
of the combined anthropogenic RF.
Bertrand was investigating the effect
of solar and
volcanic influence on climate and concluded «these are clearly not sufficient to explain the observed 20th century warming and more specifically the warming trend which started at the beginning
of the 1970s».
You picked a time period (1980 - 1987) where the beginning was
influenced by the
volcanic eruption
of El Chichon in 1981.
A paper published in Environmental Research Letters by Rahmstorf, Foster, and Cazenave (2012) applied the methodology
of Foster and Rahmstorf (2011), using the statistical technique
of multiple regression to filter out the
influences of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and solar and
volcanic activity from the global surface temperature data to evaluate the underlying long - term primarily human - caused trend.
The red line incorporates natural
influences like changes in solar output and
volcanic activity but virtually all
of the long - term warming is attributable to human - caused increases in greenhouse gasses.
One question (not the only one but the most obvious) that comes to my mind is the
influence of volcanic eruptions.
A true «prediction» can't be made because the result will depend on the future
volcanic eruptions and other
influences on albedo, but you can run the model for each
of a couple dozen stochastic processes for the future
volcanic activity.
[4] The ocean's
influence extends even to the composition
of volcanic rocks through seafloor metamorphism, as well as to that
of volcanic gases and magmas created at subduction zones.
There they reflect sunlight back into space, mimicking the
influence of large
volcanic eruptions that have temporarily cooled the planet in the past.
The literature since the AR4, and the availability
of more simulations
of the last millennium with more complete forcing, including solar,
volcanic and greenhouse gas
influences, and generally also land use change and orbital forcing) and more sophisticated models, to a much larger extent coupled climate or coupled earth system models, some
of them with interactive carbon cycle, strengthens these conclusions.
In the abstract you say that you can easily define certain effects (in the MWP period) such as GHG
influence, «the reconstructions
of solar,
volcanic and land use - related forcing are more uncertain».
Isolation
of ENSO, solar and
volcanic influences the better to reveal an underlying hypothesised anthropogenic trend is disallowed?