The defence
of volenti non fit injuria (voluntary assumption of risk) can preclude you from successfully suing the driver.
He said it was a clear case
of volenti non fit injuria (voluntary assumption of risk), and urged the court to make progress.
Not exact matches
However, in the context
of e-cigarettes, manufacturers who persist in their claims that their products are «harmless», in the absence
of proof, may well be forfeiting their rights to the
volenti trump card that has, in the past, served the tobacco industry so well.
I'm already trying to think
of ways to visually represent «
volenti non fit injuria» and «omnia praesumuntur contra spoliatorem»... but perhaps an easier place to start would be the equitable «clean hands» principle.