On Friday, the government won another court case, allowing it to bar the use
of voter information cards as a valid form of identification.
The Democrats and Republicans each wield increasingly complex software packed full
of voter information, opinions and support.
This constant flow
of voter information allowed the campaign to refine its outreach over time, helping it to use resources, particularly volunteer time, efficiently.
Winners will be determined not just by their financial war chest, but by the size
of their voter information database.
Not exact matches
Schwerin went on to say that adviser Minyon Moore had raised tough questions about the wisdom
of making the speech because it could «unintentionally end up elevating questions that aren't yet being widely asked and introduce new damaging
information, especially super predator, to a lot more
voters.»
In one case, ICE officers were said to be «following a lead» and that they «received
information» on the specific room number
of a suspect who hours earlier had shown the front - desk clerk a Mexican
voter ID card.
AggregateIQ is also under investigation by privacy commissioners in Ottawa, B.C. and the United Kingdom for its alleged role in the controversy that has engulfed Cambridge Analytica, which has been accused
of improperly using private Facebook
information from millions
of users to influence
voters and give the «Leave» side a win in the U.K.'s 2016 Brexit referendum.
Hence,
voters who value full disclosure would like to see not just his returns, but lots
of additional
information demonstrating that the two categories are kept scrupulously separate.
Deep Root emphasized in its statement that the data that was accessed «was, to the best
of our knowledge, proprietary
information as well as
voter data that is publicly available and readily provided by state government offices.»
The
information did not include highly sensitive
information like Social Security numbers, and much
of it was publicly available
voter - registration data provided by state government officials, a company spokesman told Business Insider on Tuesday.
Time reported on Thursday that the hackers successfully altered
voter information in at least one election database and stole thousands
of voter records containing private
information like Social Security numbers.
Trump's explanation
of where the jobs went was simple enough to resonate with even the most low -
information voters: They went to Mexico and China, shipped there by politicians who cut trade deals tailored to benefit multinational corporations, not American workers.
But the exposed database combined people's personal
information and political inclinations — including proprietary
information gathered via predictive modeling tools — to create a detailed profile
of nearly 200 million Americans that would be a «gold mine» for anyone looking to target and manipulate
voters, said Archie Agarwal, the founder
of the cybersecurity firm ThreatModeler.
It was Zuckerberg's job in the hearing to provide reassurance in the wake
of the news that political data firm Cambridge Analytica harvested
information from more than 87 million Facebook users to create
voter profiles that were used by Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
Cambridge Analytica is accused
of collecting the personal
information of 50 million users
of the Facebook social network without their consent and would have used it to develop software to predict and influence
voter voting during the campaign American election according to the New York Times and the Guardian.
Its report about Facebook covering the period from 2015 to 2017 — a time during which Cambridge Analytica may have tapped Facebook data to create «psychographic» profiles
of voters — found that Facebook's privacy controls «were operating with sufficient effectiveness,» according to copies
of its reviews obtained through open - records requests by the Electronic Privacy
Information Center, or EPIC, a watchdog group.
The personal
information of up to 87 million Facebook users ended up in the hands
of the
voter - profiling firm Cambridge Analytica, which worked with the Trump campaign in the 2016 presidential election.
We must take action in the face
of serious allegations that democracy is being manipulated through analysis
of the personal
information of voters.
Alexander Nix, the CEO
of the London - based
voter profiling company Cambridge Analytica — which harvested private
information from more than 50 million Facebook users without their permission to analyze their
voter behavior — has been suspended from his job.
A
voter - profiling company was able to harvest data
of 50 million Facebook profiles even though only about 270,000 users agreed to hand over their
information.
Which does rather underline CA's priorities in this project: Obtain, as fast as possible, lots
of personal data on US
voters, but don't worry much about keeping that personal
information safe.
«That is an explicit acknowledgment that this payment was about the election and was about hiding
information from
voters immediately before the presidential election,» said Paul S. Ryan, vice president
of policy and litigation at watchdog group Common Cause, which filed a legal claim over the payment.
Reacting to revelations that the political research and consulting firm Cambridge Analytica obtained Facebook user data for the purpose
of influencing
voters in multiple countries, the Internet Society called it «the natural outcome
of today's data driven economy that puts businesses and others first, not users» and called for «higher standards for transparency and ethics when it comes to the handling
of our
information.
That
information was then used by Cambridge Analytica to build psychological profiles
of voters in the United States and others.
When Obama preyed upon the emotions
of low
information voters, many on the right were critical not just
of Obama and his insubstantial campaigns, but
of the uninformed, ill - informed, and misinformed
voters who flocked to him in ignorance.
He adds that the theory that
voters were swayed by hoaxes assumes that Trump
voters were unsophisticated consumers
of information, which he doesn't buy.
Kogan's app also provided access to «more limited
information about friends who had their privacy settings set to allow it,» Grewal wrote — aka friends
of friends — which allowed Cambridge to build profiles for millions
of potential
voters.
Facebook proved to be an efficient backdoor for micro-targeting the minds
of millions
of voters, further isolating people in
information bubbles
of their own «truth.»
Dubbed Facebook's «collapse»
of public trust, the double revelation that Cambridge Analytica, ostensibly a
voter - profiling company, collected the data
of 50 million Facebook accounts without user permission, and that thousands
of third - party developers built apps on Facebook's platform to gather private
information has spurred international outrage.
That's the question many Americans are asking after revelations that a data - mining firm working for the Trump campaign improperly got its hands on the personal
information of tens
of millions
of Facebook users and created detailed profiles that were used to target unsuspecting
voters in the presidential election.
A personality research app he created gathered the personal
information on 270,000 Facebook users, as well as data on those users» friends, amplifying the reach to the tens
of millions when it passed that data to Cambridge for a
voter targeting scheme.
The issue
of independence comes down to the credibility
of Statistics Canada and the
information it provides to
voters and governments, Smith said.
India's
information technology minister last week warned against any abuse
of social media in elections, following reports that the analytics firm improperly accessed
information on millions
of Facebook users to target U.S.
voters.
This database contains each
voter's name, as well as basic personal
information (such as mailing address, sex, and date
of birth).
Facebook continues to reel from increased scrutiny and criticism in the wake
of allegations that it provided users» personal
information to data firm Cambridge Analytica, which was then used to influence
voters in the 2016 US presidential campaign.
In Edwards» case, his lawyers argued $ 1 million in secret payments to Edwards» pregnant mistress by Edwards» donors were aimed at shielding his wife, Elizabeth, who died
of cancer in 2010, not hiding the
information from
voters.
The Guardian reports the U.K.
Information Commissioner's Office is launching an investigation into the collection and use
of voters» personal data in political campaigns.
We must stay vigilant against the absolute * nutters * or * low
information voters * that are Fox News junkies
of our society.
Among
voters who attend services at least monthly, only 16 percent
of white evangelicals, 22 percent
of Catholics, and 5 percent
of white mainline Protestants said that their churches provided
information on voting, the election, or specific candidates this year.
Dahl then zeroed in on television coverage: «
Voters are asked to make judgments about the character
of the candidates — without real discussion, with advertising and sound bites that trivialize their differences and give limited and prejudicial
information.
Their group - created strategy included these actions: establishing cooperative links with other churches and groups committed to ecology; developing a Center
of Ecology
Information and a paperback book table at the church; devising methods to reach decision - makers in the community; exploring the development
of a coordinating council
of all ecology groups active in that community — Sierra Club, Friends
of the Earth, Zero Population Growth, League
of Conservation
Voters, Wilderness Society, National Wildlife Federation, National Audubon Society, World Population, GASP (Group Against Smog Pollution), Planned Parenthood, etc..
We're just proud as hell to be one
of the first to provide this
information in a way that actually allows the average
voter to sort
of «meet» their candidates and hear them give their take on actual questions about issues relevant to them — especially since these days, people get more and more
of their
information online.
The more candidates a
voter has to consider, the less likely a
voter is to make an informed decision about any
of those candidates and the harder it is for the media to communicate
information about the people who represent the
voter to the
voter so that the
voter may make referendum style decisions to vote out a bum who is underperforming or acting contrary to the
voter's wishes.
Also note that companies like Catalist and NGPVAN don't just sell the
voter file; they typically add additional data, for instance by cross-referencing
voter information with consumer databases to build up demographic profiles
of individual citizens.
Ergo, since
voters don't always know what's good for them, this gives rise to the category
of moral wrongdoing called populism, in which politicians give
voters what they want, rather than giving
voters what they would want if they were better informed and / or better at processing the relevant kind (s)
of information.
At a news conference on Wednesday, NDC's General Secretary, Johnson Asiedu Nketia, demanded the arrest
of Dr. Bawumia for allegedly falsifying
information to buttress a claim
of the NPP that there were about 76,000 Togolese in Ghana's
voters» register.
Another consideration: just about any campaign can also benefit from having a body
of clear, topical and targeted content on published on the web in a variety
of outlets, since
voters, bloggers and journalists alike will be turning to Google and other search engines for basic
information about races and candidates.
When Zephyr Teachout looked at the Republican candidates» sites from the point
of view
of an undecided
voter a few weeks ago, she pointed out how few made it easy to find basic
information about why someone SHOULD support the candidate.
At one
of this year's many data - focused Netroots Nation panels, former Obama data guru Ethan Roeder noted something about the effective use
of voter - targeting technologies: that's it's less about the data itself, and more about creating a culture
of letting the
information in...
It is right that Scottish
voters are given as much
information as possible about the likely outcome
of a «yes» vote.