Press Release: 50th Anniversary
of the War on Poverty: Have we snatched defeat from the jaws of victory?
None of these initiatives will remind folks
of the War on Poverty or other grand federal gestures.
The Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) was created as a central part
of the War on Poverty.
On the 50th anniversary
of the War on Poverty, Cantor was among several high - profile lawmakers raising a GOP voice in the national discourse around poverty and policy.
Many of these policy advocates were veterans
of the War on Poverty and the civil rights movement.
A Lesson plan on the NYTimes Learning Network contrasts this speech with a news report
of the War on Poverty 50 years later.
Since its beginning in 1965 as a part
of the War on Poverty, Head Start «s goal has been to boost the school readiness of low - income children.
In the latest issue of the New York Review of Books, Christopher Jencks reviews Legacies
of the War on Poverty and explains why there is disagreement over the impact
of the War on Poverty (and also why it is so difficult to measure changes in the poverty rate over time).
The Problem of Head Start Nowhere is resistance to structured, curriculum - based, standards - and - assessment - driven early education clearer than in the big, iconic, federal early - childhood program known as Head Start, a legacy of Lyndon Johnson's mid-1960s declaration
of war on poverty.
Forgive an aging education - reformer's reminiscences, but LBJ's declaration
of war on poverty shaped the next 50 years of my life.
That was Lyndon B. Johnson's vision in devising the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as part
of the War on Poverty.
At the dawn
of the War on Poverty, it was necessary for Coleman and his colleagues to document and describe the racial gaps in achievement they were intending to address.
Those efforts trace back to President Johnson's 1964 declaration
of a War on Poverty, when he made the case that the country had to conquer hunger to help children make educational...
Cooke's committee, which met several times in January and February of 1965, had a free hand in designing Head Start, which became the best known and most popular
of the War on Poverty programs.
It is my understanding that affirmative action in higher education was an extension
of the War on Poverty, which was expected to provide students from low - income families with greater access to predominantly white colleges and universities.
The federal role in education has been a growth industry since at least the Johnson administration, when the Elementary and Secondary School Act (ESEA, now the Every Student Succeeds Act, ESSA) was passed as a part
of the War on Poverty, with a focus on closing the achievement gap and equalizing funding between the rich and the poor.
I spent two wonderful years as a public school math teacher and then unexpectedly got the job of a lifetime — working for the federal government as part
of the War on Poverty.
This series of articles in Education Week, to be gathered over 18 months, reflects on the anniversary
of the War on Poverty and its impact on the lives of children, especially those living in poverty.
This package of stories and multimedia reflects on the 50th anniversary
of the War on Poverty and its impact on the lives of children, especially those living in poverty.
The ambitious early - childhood program launched in 1965 as part
of the War on Poverty is going through dramatic — and sometimes painful — changes, while continuing to pursue its mission.
The lack of progress in building self - sufficiency since the beginning
of the War on Poverty 50 years ago is due in major part to the welfare system itself.
At the Library of Law and Liberty, Greg Weiner reconsiders Daniel Patrick Moynihan's criticisms
of the War on Poverty, and suggests conservatives who frequently cite his work on the subject miss Moynihan's broader point: It was not that too much money was being misspent on the poor, but rather that those resources which were directed at the poor were all too often funneled through the middle class professional classes:
The Community Action Program
of the War on Poverty with its slogan «maximum feasible participation of the poor» might at first sight appear inspired by Alinsky.
Not exact matches
It focuses
on helping victims
of war,
poverty, natural disasters, disease, and famine.
As a result, Mr. Xi embarked
on a massive anti-corruption campaign that the Chinese public has broadly applauded, just like they applaud the successes
of his massive
war on poverty and environmental degradation.
Her article goes a long way toward explaining the feminization
of poverty and the
war on children, phenomena that in my view could eventually destroy the social fabric
of our nation and undermine any hope
of a bright future for my two young sons.
LBJ's
War on Poverty sure got the man out
of his castle.
You are idiots for calling him
on the carpet, instead you should be getting the federal government out
of the
poverty fighting business, The
war on poverty is over 44 years old and for all intents and purposes all it did was create an out
of control bureaucracy that needs to be taken apart and labeled a bad idea for future generations.
In one
of his final speeches, King admonished: «If our nation can spend $ 35 billion dollars a year to fight an unjust, evil
war in Vietnam, and $ 20 billion dollars to put a man
on the moon, it can spend billions
of dollars to put God's children
on their own two feet right here...» MLK's talking points
of tapping into America's financial resources in order to help the
poverty - stricken across the land were directly at odds with the economic status quo, and that is part
of what got him killed.
Countless times in his career, Michael Harrington heard himself introduced as «the author
of The Other America, the book that sparked the
war on poverty.»
At a press conference
on Monday to present the report, Cardinal Louis Antonio Tagle
of the Philippines said Catholic clergy meeting here have largely focused
on the impact
of poverty,
war and immigration
on families.
In Pursuit:
Of Happiness and Good Governmentby charles murraysimon and schuster, 341 pages, $ 19.95 In January of 1964 President Lyndon Johnson's Council of Economic Advisers helped launch the War on Poverty by including in its annual report a chapter on «The Problem of Poverty in America.&raqu
Of Happiness and Good Governmentby charles murraysimon and schuster, 341 pages, $ 19.95 In January
of 1964 President Lyndon Johnson's Council of Economic Advisers helped launch the War on Poverty by including in its annual report a chapter on «The Problem of Poverty in America.&raqu
of 1964 President Lyndon Johnson's Council
of Economic Advisers helped launch the War on Poverty by including in its annual report a chapter on «The Problem of Poverty in America.&raqu
of Economic Advisers helped launch the
War on Poverty by including in its annual report a chapter
on «The Problem
of Poverty in America.&raqu
of Poverty in America.»
There Murray tried to demonstrate, with an imposing array
of technical information, that the
War on Poverty had eventually aggravated most
of the problems it set out to solve.
We are forced to conclude that a major reason that clergymen high
on doctrinalism are so unlikely to preach about the problems
of race,
war and
poverty is that they see such problems as mundane in contrast to the joys
of the world to come, and besides, they believe these social ills would take care
of themselves if enough men were brought to Christ.
On top
of that, the same right - wing cons who praise capitalism as the reason that millions
of people have, truthfully, found a way out
of poverty, support politicians who keep wages stagnated, attack the very CONCEPT
of a minimum wage despite the skyrocketing inflation and general cost
of living, and support one
war after another that makes a handful
of people VERY rich while millions suffer, and thousands
of troops come home with no legs (and thus, lose their jobs and often never recover).
The news media now bring the world
of violence,
poverty,
war, and moral debauchery to the mind
on wide screen, in color.
But goals are also needed defining the next step which needs to be taken in any given area
of human activity, whether it be in the local schools, in dealing with
poverty, in fighting pollution, in combating racial discrimination, in ending the
war in Vietnam, and so
on.
What troubles me most as I look back
on that period is our willingness then to do anything short
of war to destroy the Chinese revolution, even though the result would have been to throw China back into the massive
poverty, corruption and partial anarchy that preceded the revolution.
One alternative is that we should recognize that the entire kit and caboodle
of welfare policies and «
war on poverty» programs is misconceived.
But we all participate in ideologies that can be brought to bear
on the problems that plague our species — evils
of war,
poverty, racism, hatred, genocide, marginalization, consumerism, the systematic rape
of our planet to support extractive economies, etc..
Greg Weiner at the Library
of Law and Liberty blog writes today to remind us that The
War on Poverty Turns 50.
Those who seek a plan for reorganizing society
on Christian lines make a judgment
of society and a demand
on the world — the judgment that the world ought not to be as it is, and the demand that society so change that there will be no more
war, no more
poverty, no more exploitation
of man; so change that a Christian finds it satisfactory.
This is a good thing, but in the critique
of Ralph Winter that David Hesselgrave gave, he referred to Ralph Winter's reliance
on Gregory Boyd's view
of «microbial evil» and the necessity
of kingdom work overcoming the forces
of darkness as represented by disease and
poverty in
war.
On the other hand, the techniques
of postcivilization also offer us the possibility
of a society in which the major sources
of human misery have been eliminated, a society in which there will be no
war,
poverty, or disease, and in which a large majority
of human beings will be able to live out their lives in relative freedom from most
of the ills which now oppress a major part
of mankind.
The loyalties
of generations
of church - going Americans were called into question as the civil rights movement became an anti-
war movement and then a
war on poverty.
Since the initiation
of President Lyndon B Johnson's
War on Poverty in 1964, the federal government has spent $ 22 trillion dollars trying to lift low - income Americans out of p
Poverty in 1964, the federal government has spent $ 22 trillion dollars trying to lift low - income Americans out
of povertypoverty.
In the early days
of the federal
War on Poverty in the 1960s, researchers provided three - and four - year - olds from impoverished Ypsilanti, Michigan, with enriched preschooling, and then compared their life trajectories over several decades with those
of Ypsilanti peers who had not received any early childhood education.
If I'm wrong, RT's rolodex
of politicians, hacks and academics are welcome
on their next appearance to add that all these problems - inequality,
poverty, corruption, repression and
war - are much worse in Russia.
«Who here is the small «c» conservative saying to people «stay stuck in your sink estates» - have nothing better than what Labour gave you after the
war... that's the fact
of politics today - a party
on this side
of the house that wants to give people life chances and a Labour opposition that says «say stuck in
poverty».»
Most
of the 60's programs, like the
War on Poverty, had very mixed results, with result that such Progressives were in some ways overtaken by the «New Left».