Sentences with phrase «of water vapour from»

There is also an increasing poleward transport of water vapour from lower latitudes.

The outflow of water vapour from moons and dwarf planets is similar to that we see from comets.

Not exact matches

For example, one emerging area of Westech's business, Integrated Solutions, pulls together custom engineering and design for a mix of everything from water recovery to gas emissions analysis, vapour pressure and anything else a client requires.

Combining observations from satellites and ground stations with climate models, they evaluated different factors that affect telescope vision, such as the amount of water vapour, wind speeds and atmospheric turbulence.

The separation into two chambers means there are two separate flue gas streams to deal with too: air with a reduced concentration of oxygen is discharged from one chamber, water vapour and CO2 from the other.

One intriguing possibility is that they were droplets of salty water that grew by absorbing water vapour from the atmosphere.

He says the clumps were probably patches of ice that formed and grew from water vapour freezing onto the leg.

So droplets of salty fluid on Mars would tend to absorb water vapour from the atmosphere, explaining why the clumps grew over time.

Their roots can penetrate deep underground to tap hidden water sources, and they produce much of the life - giving water vapour that emanates from forests.

Now images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope have revealed a large cloud of hydrogen and oxygen — most likely in the form of water vapour — extending from the moon's south pole.

Outflow of water vapour has been detected from the surface of the dwarf planet Ceres, which is in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

Elisabetta Pierazzo of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona, and colleagues used a global climate model to study how water vapour and sea salt thrown up from an impact will affect ozone levels for years after the event.

On a previous, much closer pass by Enceladus, Cassini detected that the south pole of Enceladus is spewing out a vast plume of water vapour that stretches hundreds of kilometres from the moon's surface and keeps Saturn's E-ring topped up — but it has now captured the first images of this activity.

The lack of water vapour in the atmosphere there allows terahertz radiation from space to reach the ground and be detected.

This process of smoothing the original water isotope variations from precipitation is dependent on the temperature, as the water molecules in vapour form are more mobile at warmer temperatures.

His results lend support to the theory that the oceans were formed by water vapour released from the hot interior of the young Earth.

The NASA / ESA Hubble Space Telescope has discovered water vapour erupting from the frigid surface of Jupiter's moon Europa, in one or more localised plumes near its south pole.

In addition, around the tropopause the air is close to saturation with water and a small increase of vapour from aircraft can create wide expanses of thin cirrus clouds that cause even stronger warming.

If it were possible to leave the clouds but remove all other water vapour from the atmosphere, only about 40 % less infrared of all frequencies would be absorbed.

Researchers have been fascinated with Enceladus since July 2005, when Cassini revealed plumes of ice particles and water vapour shooting out from the moon's south pole.

This is a function of the increase in fractionation as water vapour is continually removed from the air.

What is evident from the dust during the cool phase and lack of dust during the warm phase was that the water vapour content of the air suddenly changed.

Water undergoes a change of state from gas to liquid under these conditions, because cooler air can hold less water vapour than warmerWater undergoes a change of state from gas to liquid under these conditions, because cooler air can hold less water vapour than warmerwater vapour than warmer air.

Recent studies have shown a doubling of stratospheric water vapour, likely from increasing atmospheric heights due to global warming, overshooting thunderstorm tops from stronger tropical cyclones and mesoscale convective systems etc...

Initial data from the Cassini - Huygens spacecraft, which began exploring the Saturnian system in 2004, show that methane is indeed a minor atmospheric constituent but a very important one, possibly playing a role analogous to that of water vapour in Earth's troposphere.

The short - and long - wave absorptivities of the most important greenhouse gases water vapour, carbon dioxide, methane and ozone are derived from line - by - line calculations based on the HITRAN08 - databasis and are integrated in the model.

«Here we report the detection of water vapour around Ceres, with at least 1026 molecules being produced per second, [13 pounds / sec] originating from localized sources that seem to be linked to mid-latitude regions on the surface.»

There, plumes of ice and water vapour were discovered, jetting out from cracks in its surface.

V](Andrew Noren, 1987) Rak ti Khon Kaen (Cemetery of Splendour, Apichatpong Weerasethakul, 2015) + Vapour (2015) Passacaglia y Fuga (Jorge Honik, 1974) + La mirada errante (1969 - 1981) Circle (Jack Chambers, 1969) On Dangerous Ground (Nicholas Ray, 1951) Echoes of Silence (Peter Emmanuel Goldman, 1967) Lumière d'été (Jean Grémillon, 1943) + Remorques (1941, Gardiens de phare (1929), L'Amour d'une femme (1954), Le Ciel est à vous (1944), Le 6 juin à l'aube (1946) Corps à coeur (Paul Vecchiali, 1979) + Trous de mémoire (1985) Anna (Alberto Grifi & Massimo Sarchielli, 1975) An Affair to Remember (Leo McCarey, 1957) John From (João Nicolau, 2015) Suite California & Stops Passes Part 1: Tijuana to Hollywood Via Death Valley (1976) Part 2: San Francisco to Sierra Nevadas & Back Again (Robert Nelson, 1978) Plumb - line (Carolee Schneemann, 1968) No Home Movie (Chantal Akerman, 2015) Thorndon (Joanna Margaret Paul, 1975) + Napkins (1975), Aberhart's House (1976) Un enano en el jardín (Claudio Caldini, 1981), A través de las ruinas (1982), Ofrenda (1978), Aspiraciones (1976), Baltazar (1975) Rose (Siloh Cinquemani, 2013) + Narcissi (2013) Dripping Water (Michael Snow, 1969) + To Lavoisier, Who Died in the Reign of Terror (1991), Rameau's Nephew by Diderot (thanx to Dennis Young) by Wilma Schoen (1974) Heads and Tales (Francis Conrad, 1967) Reel 30b01 — Positano (Pierre Clémenti, 1969) La noche bengalí (Narcisa Hirsch & Werner Nekes, 1980) La nuit claire (Marcel Hanoun, 1979) Human Desire (Fritz Lang, 1954) Le jardin qui bascule (Guy Gilles, 1975) Bérénice (Éric Rohmer, 1954) + Les nuits de la pleine lune (Full Moon in Paris, 1984) Simone Barbès ou la vertu (Marie - Claude Treilhou, 1980) There's Always Tomorrow (Douglas Sirk, 1956) + Zu neuen Ufern (1937) Tender is the Night (Henry King, 1962) Loin de Manhattan (Jean - Claude Biette, 1982) Five Year Diary.

However, they can provide both positive and negative forcing» and Ray # 252 «we understand extremely well the way greenhouse gasses [sic] like CO2 warm the planet» So here we go — Assumptions from considerations of physics: Unless CO2 could enlist water vapour to amplify its forcing it would simply be an unremarkable trace gas in the atmosphere, but — CO2 + water (vapour) = + ve feedback implying warming CO2 + water (liquid) = - ve feedback implying cooling Facts: Clouds cover half the surface of the planet.

If the enhanced atmospheric warming from a CO2 - induced temperature rise of 1 oC results in enhanced water vapour that gives an additional warming of say x oC, the overall warming (doubled CO2 + water vapour feedback; leaving out other feedbacks for now) will be something like 1.1 * (1 + x + x2 + x3...) or 1.1 / (1 - x)-RSB-.

What I'm trying to get at is some simplistic estimate of the water vapour feedback that results from an enhanced CO2 - induced warming of say 1.1 oC from the CO2 RF of around 4 Wm - 2.

Assumptions from considerations of physics: Unless CO2 could enlist water vapour to amplify its forcing it would simply be an unremarkable trace gas in the atmosphere, but --

The short - and long - wave absorptivities of the most important greenhouse gases water vapour, carbon dioxide, methane and ozone are derived from line - by - line calculations based on the HITRAN08 - databasis and are integrated in the model.

(For instance, with a shortening of ~ 1,2 % of the ~ 9,5 days average «life time of water vapour» — or «temps de residence»... in french — that may be inferred from 20th century hydrographic data?)

The rise of CO2 from 270ppm to now over 400ppm, the extent of equatorial and sub tropical deforestation, the soot deposits on the polar ice caps, the increase in atmospheric water vapour due to a corresponding increase in ocean temps and changes in ocean currents, the extreme ice albedo currently happening in the arctic etc, etc are all conspiring in tandem to alter the climate as we know it.

Re # 36 Lawrence, your cousin is correct that the greenhouse effect of water vapour, and even more so clouds are much larger (x 2 — x 4) than that from CO2.

The conversion of a water molecule to a water vapour molecule involves a huge energy transfer from water to air so evaporation alone is a substantial factor.

The dry band at the northern edge of the NH Hadley zone results means nearly all water vapour from the tropics has been precipitated out.

Of that which travels north, much of it will be precipitated out, with some of that being replaced by newly evaporated water vapour from mid-latitude oceanOf that which travels north, much of it will be precipitated out, with some of that being replaced by newly evaporated water vapour from mid-latitude oceanof it will be precipitated out, with some of that being replaced by newly evaporated water vapour from mid-latitude oceanof that being replaced by newly evaporated water vapour from mid-latitude oceans.

All that said, we can draw the conclusion that the theoretical effects of CO2 do in fact exist, they have been measured over a 10 cm path length, and from this we can extrapolate that a still higher sensitivity would be arrived at once the entire atmospheric scale and the change in water vapour concentration from bottom to top of that scale is taken into account.

In the past no tipping point has ever been known to have occurred as a result of runaway warming from extra water vapour so how have we been persuaded to fear it so much?

These models suggest that if the net effect of ocean circulation, water vapour, cloud, and snow feedbacks were zero, the approximate temperature response to a doubling of carbon dioxide from pre-industrial levels would be a 1oC warming.

But the notion of «internal forcings» means that what we consider only as temperature feedbacks, as the clouds or the water vapour, might be differentiated from temperature and might depend from others parameters.

Based on evidence from Earth's history, we suggest here that the relevant form of climate sensitivity in the Anthropocene (e.g. from which to base future greenhouse gas (GHG) stabilization targets) is the Earth system sensitivity including fast feedbacks from changes in water vapour, natural aerosols, clouds and sea ice, slower surface albedo feedbacks from changes in continental ice sheets and vegetation, and climate — GHG feedbacks from changes in natural (land and ocean) carbon sinks.

Microwave radiometers are very sensitive gauges of energy transmitted from the Earth which scientists can use to judge the amount of water, ice or water vapour underneath the spacecraft's flight path.

Water vapour causes lower supported surface temperatures, as I have shown in a study of real world temperature records over 30 years from three continents.

On the earth the supply of water vapour is unlimited over the greater part of the surface, and the actual mean temperature results from a balance reached between the solar» constant» and the properties of water and air.

The most credible of the contrarians, Richard Lindzen, has relied primarily on arguments that the feedback from water vapour, which plays a central role in climate models, might actually be zero or even negative.

(A sidestep: The rise of the CO2 in atmosphere from 0.03 to 0.04 % does not have any meaning in this play where the water vapour is far the greatest player.