Sentences with phrase «of weapon they wanted»

The guns are great Since we're in the 2050s, developers Sledgehammer Games were left to happily invent any type of weapon they wanted.

You choose your server, and if it's a team game you choose a team after you've entered the server and last you pick what kind of weapon you want to carry, you can only carry one but you can of course drop your existing weapon and pick up other weapons.

Not exact matches

The United States wants to dismantle older warheads so that it can substitute some of them with newer, more lethal weapons.

They are issued deadly weapons and asked to insert themselves into situations that the rest of us want desperately to avoid.

The first half of the film feels strangely off — it starts with a prologue set in the»80s that introduces Michael Douglass as Hank Pym, a scientist with a remarkable formula for shrinking matter who decides to hide it from the government agents that want it as a weapon (there are also quite a few Easter eggs for Marvel fans in those first few minutes).

Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California wants to ban assault weapons, instate a federal gun buy - back program for those who own them and criminally prosecute those who refuse to hand them over.

«I want to tell all those who have fueled the arms race over the last 15 years, sought to win unilateral advantages over Russia, introduced unlawful sanctions aimed to contain our country's development... you have failed to contain Russia,» Putin said, later adding that «any use of nuclear weapons against Russia or its allies... any kind of attack... will be regarded as a nuclear attack against Russia and in response we will take action instantaneously no matter what the consequences are.

The whole racism thing is just smoke and mirrors and not necessarily out of hand (I mean, if we're allowed to brandish anti-semitism as weapon, it's only fair), there might be a bit of racism, direct or indirect, but I think it's pretty ridiculous for this woman to want to be buried there in the first place.

You can not hold the position that we should keep the status quo of letting people sell whatever giant clips and assault weapons to whoever they want whenever they want can you?

As sociology came to mean a weapon of aggression for some, others, bent on the defensive, wanted a «religious,» «Christian,» or «Protestant» sociology.

I put Ron Paul to the side because, even if the Republicans do someday nominate a gold standard supporter who wants sharp defense cuts, but it won't be this year, won't be someone who thinks he wants to zero out nuclear weapons production, and military nuclear propulsion production, transportation, and testing, and it won't be a ex-publisher of racist newsletters who can't fully come clean.

There will always be people of ill intent who want to use words as weapons, but they must be allowed to exist so that resonable people can use words as weapons against true enemies of freedom.

That's why I wanted to try to emphasize in the post that our «weapons» are love, grace, mercy, forgiveness, generosity, service, kindness, and other «fruits of the Spirit.»

The assault weapon ban was SOOOO successful in stopping gun crimes the LAST time, liberals want to do it again... What is the definition of insanity?

A family opts to live on less money after the husband refuses to accept a job transfer that would have him designing weapons and the wife decides she wants to stay at home with their children; to act on these values, the family renovates an old house, relies on bicycles instead of a car, and grows some of its own food.

You're buying into the lie, because there are and have been people in power who want us to continue to decimate our economy and our nation, pouring all of our wealth into the hands of a few weapons manufacturers and oil corporations.

She thought that weapons inspections «had been tried and found wanting» «There's a lot of wishful thinking going on about the power and efficiency of the UN.

The religious do nt want their money going for contraception... but its perfectly ok that their money goes towards war, killing hundreds of thousands of people, making better weapons, and of course, the death penalty.

In the U.S., what I care about is when they want to crap all over different people in differing ways because they differ and don't agree with one another; and because this conflicted nature of the Christian belief system is thus often used as a weapon of bigotry.

Then I thought ok, so he wants to help the economy of a country that already takes billions from us and uses it to fund a weapons program and support their army.

Usually, I can tactfully avoid the requests / demands but occasionally (when they pull out the weapons of shame and guilt) I find myself wanting to pick up those «expectation» bars and begin building my own cage.

Contrary to popular belief, most Republicans want to make assault - style weapons illegal, while many Democrats are in favor of a 20 - week abortion ban.

Sometimes I think I'd rather believe in a God that doesn't «answer» prayers than a God that gives me what I want for me and mine and lets children be raped or forced into drug habits and used as weapons of war.

I can understand Wenger not wanting to lose the physicality, aerial prowess and link up play of the Frenchman but the pace and finishing of the Englishman are also big weapons for the Gunners.

I want them to take Lamar Jackson in the 3rd or forth round and use him as some type of change up weapon at the backup QB position.

Thompson wanted to keep one of the weapons, a.357 Magnum, for protection, but he agreed about getting rid of the second gun, an Uzi - type assault weapon.

Ok guys... In light of Jose's comments about breaking «Arsene Wengers face» if he ever saw him outside a football environment, I want to know who you thought would win a street fight with no weapons allowed?

We had a lot of cap room, it's not a particularly long contract, and we wanted to maximize our weapons for our young QB

Your child also runs the risk of having a friend who wants to show off the weapons that are in his house.

If you fall into the category of women who want to breastfeed in public but would rather not display your boobs for all to see, then a great nursing cover is your secret weapon.

For example, building a «backpack» nuclear weapon still requires an industrial infrastructure and leaves a logistics trail; plus anyone wanting to rely on such a device would probably want to test it and there are systems in place to identify the seismic signatures of nuclear detonations.

It also signifies a significant victory for the Foreign Office and Department of International Development, who have long wanted the weapons banned, while the Ministry of Defence have fought to retain them.

The whole notion of «do as I say or we will invade» is becoming more acceptable in the west and just adds to list of why they want these weapons.

Two Democratic state senators want a law that specifically outlaws the possession or sale of so - called «bump» stocks that can modify a weapon to have it imitate an automatic rife — the use of which are already banned in New York.

Essentially, India's polcies regarding no - first - use of the weapons, lack of apparent desire to create a large stockpile, and claims that they want to sign a stronger version of the NPT meant that other nations didn't see much need to sanction or otherwise punish India for their weapons program.

Mahmood Mandami writes, «will this mobilization of millions be subverted into yet another weapon in the hands of those who want to militarize the region further?

The questions is if Iran will want and decide in the future, after it is not being sanctioned by no one and the agreement is over, to follow a path to start using its nuclear program to create weapons of mass destruction.

A big part of the problem with chemical weapons is that nobody wants to admit that something relatively effective against a civilian target can be comparatively so very simple, these are generally terror weapons.

«We want to prevent mass shootings from happening and while this could have happened with other types of weapons, NeverAgain believes school safety should be priority right now, not just background checks,» said Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student Kali Clougherty, 18, referring to a campaign for gun control.

Korea likely sees us for the hypocrites we are, thus, doesn't want to be told by the only people in the history of the world to ever use nuclear weapons, what to do with theirs.

Opinion polls show that a significant majority of the public do not want to see Trident replaced, so cancelling plans for new nuclear weapons would be a vote - winner.

Gun owners who don't want to register their assault weapons with the state have until tomorrow to get rid of those guns and any previously legal large - capacity magazines or face misdemeanor charges under the Safe Act.

They also want to remain in the European Union and, in significant shift of policy, remain members of NATO, though they would try to expel UK nuclear weapons from Scotland.

We both strongly oppose the acquisition or testing of nuclear weapons by North Korea and we both want to see a resumption of the six party talks.

Ryan supports the Second Amendment, said a spokesman, «but he doesn't want the kind of assault weapons he used in combat in the hands of civilians.»

Americans want stronger background checks, a ban on bump stocks and assurances that military - style weapons will stop finding their way into the hands of terrorists, domestic abusers and the mentally ill.

«The Syrian situation poses two conflicting goals: to allow the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government to go unanswered would encourage the Assad regime, and other rogue governments, to use them again, but the last thing America needs or wants is a protracted conflict in the Middle East when our primary focus must be on jobs, the economy and the middle class.

They want proof of the use of chemical weapons and who by.

In fact, without nuclear weapons, I doubt anyone other than the rest of NATO as a bloc could seriously hope to prevent the US from doing what they wanted militarily.

But he added: «I don't think that anybody looking at the history of North Korea's plans to develop a nuclear weapon would want to be over-optimistic at this point.