Anniversary coverage was much more likely to bring up policy problems connected to the systemic causes of human vulnerability to wildfire hazards — development in the wildland - urban interface, legacies
of wildfire suppression and climate change, to name a few examples.
After a century
of wildfire suppression across the American West, many forests have grown unnaturally dense.
Not exact matches
About 2 percent
of all fires consume more than 90 percent
of the overall
wildfire suppression budget.
«I don't think anybody doubts that the cost
of fighting fires has gone up,» said Debbie Miley, executive director
of the National
Wildfire Suppression Association (NWSA), a trade group for private wildfire f
Wildfire Suppression Association (NWSA), a trade group for private
wildfire f
wildfire fighters.
But wildland fires are increasingly destructive and costly in terms
of lives and property, requiring substantial investments in
wildfire suppression.
Meanwhile, Los Angeles County will have two Bombardier CL - 415 Superscooper fire - fighting aircraft on loan from the government
of Quebec starting in the fall for
wildfire suppression, as well as the county's own fleet
of helicopters.
The U.S. Forest Service announced yesterday that it has contracted for seven new «next generation» air tankers for
wildfire suppression, part
of the service's ongoing efforts to replace its current, aging fleet.
«Over the past few decades,
wildfire suppression costs have increased as fire seasons have grown longer and the frequency, size, and severity
of wildfires has increased,» Jones said.
The NIFC calculates that nearly 39,000 homes — more than 3,000 per year — were lost to
wildfires from 2000 - 2012 and that federal, state and local agencies spent an average
of $ 4.7 billion annually during that period on WUI fire
suppression.
Meanwhile, funding for the Office
of Natural Resources Revenue will be sustained, the budget notes, and
wildfire suppression costs, estimated based on a «10 - year rolling average,» will be met in full.
Western
Wildfires — The increasingly destructive and widespread fire seasons
of recent years are likely to continue due to a combination
of increased drought and land development encroaching on naturally burning landscapes, along with a climate change — induced fuel boom (enhanced plant growth and a shift to more woody species) exacerbated by fire -
suppression efforts leading to more abundant plant matter to fuel violent blazes, according to ecologist Dominique Bachelet
of Oregon State University in Corvallis and The Nature Conservancy.
Here are some hypotheses or guesses: increased public recognition
of the danger
of wildfires, increased
suppression, or another possibility is that as more people are fragmenting the landscape, you have a decrease in the overall size
of fire events.
Stand condition is particularly important on state and federal forests where a policy
of fire
suppression for the last 100 yr has increased tree density and the risk
of mortality from defoliating and boring insects, and from
wildfire.
There are other factors that are favoring more and bigger
wildfires, such as the decades
of active fire
suppression that have created dense forests with ample fuel, making fires more difficult to control.
Dramatic images
of out -
of - control
wildfires in western North American forests have appeared on our television and computer screens with increasing regularity in recent decades, while costs
of fire
suppression have soared.
August 28, 2015 • The agency says it's now spending record amounts on fire
suppression, and these bills are coming at the expense
of its other programs — many
of which would help prevent future
wildfires.
None
of the funding proposals currently on the table would alter the incentive structure that public agencies face when it comes to
wildfire suppression.
The optimal level
of fire
suppression happens when an additional dollar
of spending on
suppression avoids at least a dollar
of wildfire damages.
Public agencies, therefore, are well positioned to realize economies
of scale and specialize when it comes to
wildfire prevention and
suppression.
Similarly, firefighters do not directly bear
suppression costs, so public
wildfire agencies have weaker incentives to be discerning about the efficient allocation
of resources than would a private landowner.
The 2015 drought conditions and lack
of snowpack led to a historically severe
wildfire season with more than 1.6 million acres burned across Oregon and Washington, resulting in more than $ 560 million in fire
suppression costs.
Ignoring a well - documented history
of natural climate change, ignoring the ill - advised 20th century policy
of fire
suppression, and ignoring the increased percentage (~ 80 to 90 %)
of fires ignited by humans, Climate Central tried to persuade the public that California fires, (as well as all recent fires) are «part
of a dire global warming - fueled trend toward larger, more frequent and intense
wildfires.»
-- The second, being the observed change
of some trees» CO2 - enhanced growth storing more carbon in their standing wood, is
of very limited potential and is not rising at anywhere near the rate
of the countervailing increase since 1980
of the impacts on forests
of droughts, heat waves and surface ozone concentrations in terms
of growth -
suppression and
of pests, ailments, dieback and rising frequency, duration and intensity
of wildfires.
«
Wildfire occurrence statewide could increase several folds by the end
of the century, increasing fire
suppression and emergency response costs and damage to property.»
Wildfire could increase on landscapes where a century
of fire
suppression has caused an unnatural buildup
of fuels, such as in North and South America, Europe, southern Africa, and Australia, causing a pulse
of carbon emissions.
But there's also the minor matter
of people building homes in
wildfire - susceptible forests, overgrown with vegetation due to decades
of fire
suppression.
In a statement, Jennifer Jones, a spokesperson for the Forest Service said fire
suppression has become more difficult due to a number
of factors including the need to protect the increasing number
of homes in
wildfire areas, hazardous fuel buildups, drought and longer fire seasons.
More than 80
wildfires burning across almost 1.5 million acres in nine western U.S. states; this year, the U.S. Forest Service has already spent about $ 1.75 billion on fire
suppression and the Department
of Interior has spent an additional $ 400 million.
«Climate change is causing fire seasons to start earlier and finish later, with an associated trend towards more extreme
wildfire events in terms
of their geographic extent and duration, intensity, severity, associated
suppression costs, and loss
of life and property,» the scientists write.
This lack
of evidence that Firewise reduces
wildfire suppression costs suggests that policy makers attempting to address future costs are better served focusing on other solutions such as limiting future development in high risk areas.
Our research finds no evidence
of a relationship between
wildfire suppression costs and Firewise participation.
State - specific research on the impact
of new homes and temperature change on
wildfire suppression costs.
Dramatic images
of out -
of - control
wildfires in western North American forests have appeared on our television and computer screens with increasing regularity in recent decades, while costs
of fire
suppression have soared.
may not be flown or otherwise removed from the United States unless dispatched by the National Interagency Fire Center in support
of an international agreement to assist in
wildfire suppression efforts or for other purposes approved by the Secretary
of Agriculture in writing in advance.